TSTP Solution File: SWB015+2 by PyRes---1.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.3
% Problem  : SWB015+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:19:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SWB015+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 00:30:40 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.51  # Version:  1.3
% 0.17/0.51  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.17/0.51  fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_015_Reflective_Tautologies_I,conjecture,iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs),input).
% 0.17/0.51  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs)),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[testcase_conclusion_fullish_015_Reflective_Tautologies_I])).
% 0.17/0.51  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[c1])).
% 0.17/0.51  cnf(c3,negated_conjecture,~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs,uri_owl_sameAs),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c2])).
% 0.17/0.51  cnf(reflexivity,axiom,X6=X6,eq_axiom).
% 0.17/0.51  fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X,Y)<=>X=Y))),input).
% 0.17/0.51  fof(c4,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:((~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X,Y)|X=Y)&(X!=Y|iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X,Y))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[owl_eqdis_sameas])).
% 0.17/0.51  fof(c5,axiom,((![X]:(![Y]:(~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X,Y)|X=Y)))&(![X]:(![Y]:(X!=Y|iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X,Y))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c4])).
% 0.17/0.51  fof(c7,axiom,(![X2]:(![X3]:(![X4]:(![X5]:((~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X2,X3)|X2=X3)&(X4!=X5|iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X5))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c6,axiom,((![X2]:(![X3]:(~iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X2,X3)|X2=X3)))&(![X4]:(![X5]:(X4!=X5|iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X5))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c5])).])).
% 0.17/0.51  cnf(c9,axiom,X18!=X17|iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X18,X17),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c7])).
% 0.17/0.51  cnf(c12,plain,iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X19,X19),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c9, reflexivity])).
% 0.17/0.51  cnf(c13,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c12, c3])).
% 0.17/0.51  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.17/0.51  
% 0.17/0.51  # Initial clauses    : 7
% 0.17/0.51  # Processed clauses  : 7
% 0.17/0.51  # Factors computed   : 0
% 0.17/0.51  # Resolvents computed: 5
% 0.17/0.51  # Tautologies deleted: 1
% 0.17/0.51  # Forward subsumed   : 1
% 0.17/0.51  # Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.17/0.51  # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.17/0.51  # User time          : 0.157 s
% 0.17/0.51  # System time        : 0.017 s
% 0.17/0.51  # Total time         : 0.174 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------