TSTP Solution File: SWB014+2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWB014+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:01:13 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWB014+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 07:35:28 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 % File : SWB014+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.19/0.63 % Domain : Semantic Web
% 0.19/0.63 % Problem : Harry belongs to some Species
% 0.19/0.63 % Version : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.19/0.63 % English :
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 % Refs : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.63 % Source : [Sch11]
% 0.19/0.63 % Names : 014_Harry_belongs_to_some_Species [Sch11]
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 % Status : Theorem
% 0.19/0.63 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0
% 0.19/0.63 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 4 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of atoms : 23 ( 0 equ)
% 0.19/0.63 % Maximal formula atoms : 11 ( 5 avg)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of connectives : 19 ( 0 ~; 1 |; 14 &)
% 0.19/0.63 % ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.63 % Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 8 avg)
% 0.19/0.63 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 9 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of variables : 12 ( 8 !; 4 ?)
% 0.19/0.63 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 % Comments :
% 0.19/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
% 0.19/0.63 ! [X,C] :
% 0.19/0.63 ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X,C)
% 0.19/0.63 <=> icext(C,X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 fof(owl_bool_unionof_class_002,axiom,
% 0.19/0.63 ! [Z,S1,C1,S2,C2] :
% 0.19/0.63 ( ( iext(uri_rdf_first,S1,C1)
% 0.19/0.63 & iext(uri_rdf_rest,S1,S2)
% 0.19/0.63 & iext(uri_rdf_first,S2,C2)
% 0.19/0.63 & iext(uri_rdf_rest,S2,uri_rdf_nil) )
% 0.19/0.63 => ( iext(uri_owl_unionOf,Z,S1)
% 0.19/0.63 <=> ( ic(Z)
% 0.19/0.63 & ic(C1)
% 0.19/0.63 & ic(C2)
% 0.19/0.63 & ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.63 ( icext(Z,X)
% 0.19/0.63 <=> ( icext(C1,X)
% 0.19/0.63 | icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_014_Harry_belongs_to_some_Species,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 ? [BNODE_x] :
% 0.19/0.63 ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_harry,BNODE_x)
% 0.19/0.63 & iext(uri_rdf_type,BNODE_x,uri_ex_Species) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 fof(testcase_premise_fullish_014_Harry_belongs_to_some_Species,axiom,
% 0.19/0.63 ? [BNODE_u,BNODE_l1,BNODE_l2] :
% 0.19/0.63 ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_Eagle,uri_ex_Species)
% 0.19/0.63 & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_Falcon,uri_ex_Species)
% 0.19/0.63 & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_harry,BNODE_u)
% 0.19/0.63 & iext(uri_owl_unionOf,BNODE_u,BNODE_l1)
% 0.19/0.63 & iext(uri_rdf_first,BNODE_l1,uri_ex_Eagle)
% 0.19/0.63 & iext(uri_rdf_rest,BNODE_l1,BNODE_l2)
% 0.19/0.63 & iext(uri_rdf_first,BNODE_l2,uri_ex_Falcon)
% 0.19/0.63 & iext(uri_rdf_rest,BNODE_l2,uri_rdf_nil) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.63 %ClaNum:20(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.63 %VarNum:159(SingletonVarNum:53)
% 0.19/0.63 %MaxLitNum:11
% 0.19/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.19/0.63 %SharedTerms:20
% 0.19/0.63 %goalClause: 11
% 0.19/0.63 [1]P1(a1,a2,a3)
% 0.19/0.63 [2]P1(a1,a5,a8)
% 0.19/0.63 [3]P1(a1,a9,a8)
% 0.19/0.63 [4]P1(a10,a6,a5)
% 0.19/0.63 [5]P1(a10,a7,a9)
% 0.19/0.63 [6]P1(a12,a6,a7)
% 0.19/0.63 [7]P1(a12,a7,a13)
% 0.19/0.63 [8]P1(a11,a3,a6)
% 0.19/0.63 [11]~P1(a1,a2,x111)+~P1(a1,x111,a8)
% 0.19/0.63 [9]~P2(x92,x91)+P1(a1,x91,x92)
% 0.19/0.63 [10]P2(x101,x102)+~P1(a1,x102,x101)
% 0.19/0.63 [12]P3(x121)+~P1(a12,x123,x122)+~P1(a10,x122,x121)+~P1(a10,x123,x124)+~P1(a11,x125,x123)+~P1(a12,x122,a13)
% 0.19/0.63 [13]P3(x131)+~P1(a12,x134,x132)+~P1(a10,x132,x133)+~P1(a10,x134,x131)+~P1(a11,x135,x134)+~P1(a12,x132,a13)
% 0.19/0.63 [14]P3(x141)+~P1(a12,x144,x142)+~P1(a11,x141,x144)+~P1(a10,x142,x143)+~P1(a10,x144,x145)+~P1(a12,x142,a13)
% 0.19/0.63 [15]P2(x151,x152)+~P2(x153,x152)+~P1(a12,x155,x154)+~P1(a11,x151,x155)+~P1(a10,x154,x153)+~P1(a10,x155,x156)+~P1(a12,x154,a13)
% 0.19/0.63 [16]P2(x161,x162)+~P2(x163,x162)+~P1(a12,x166,x164)+~P1(a11,x161,x166)+~P1(a10,x164,x165)+~P1(a10,x166,x163)+~P1(a12,x164,a13)
% 0.19/0.63 [17]P2(x171,x172)+P2(x173,x172)+~P2(x174,x172)+~P1(a12,x176,x175)+~P1(a11,x174,x176)+~P1(a10,x175,x171)+~P1(a10,x176,x173)+~P1(a12,x175,a13)
% 0.19/0.63 [19]~P3(x191)+~P3(x193)+~P3(x194)+~P1(a10,x192,x194)+~P1(a12,x192,x195)+P1(a11,x191,x192)+~P1(a10,x195,x193)+~P2(x191,f4(x191,x192,x194,x195,x193))+~P2(x194,f4(x191,x192,x194,x195,x193))+~P1(a12,x195,a13)
% 0.19/0.63 [20]~P3(x201)+~P3(x203)+~P3(x204)+~P1(a10,x202,x203)+~P1(a12,x202,x205)+P1(a11,x201,x202)+~P1(a10,x205,x204)+~P2(x201,f4(x201,x202,x203,x205,x204))+~P2(x204,f4(x201,x202,x203,x205,x204))+~P1(a12,x205,a13)
% 0.19/0.63 [18]~P3(x183)+~P3(x184)+~P3(x181)+~P1(a10,x185,x183)+~P1(a10,x182,x184)+~P1(a12,x182,x185)+P1(a11,x181,x182)+P2(x183,f4(x181,x182,x184,x185,x183))+P2(x184,f4(x181,x182,x184,x185,x183))+P2(x181,f4(x181,x182,x184,x185,x183))+~P1(a12,x185,a13)
% 0.19/0.63 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(26,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P3(a5)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,5,6,7,8,11,10,9,14,13])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(27,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P3(a9)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,5,6,7,8,11,10,9,14,13,12])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(29,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P2(a9,a2)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,5,6,7,8,11,10,9,14,13,12,17])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(32,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P1(a11,a5,a6)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,5,6,7,8,11,10,9,14,13,12,17,16,15])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(37,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P2(a9,f4(a5,a6,a5,a7,a9))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,6,7,4,32,26,27,19,18])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(42,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P1(a1,a2,a9)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,6,7,4,32,26,27,29,19,18,11,10,9])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(54,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 ($false),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,8,6,5,7,4,37,42,15,11]),
% 0.19/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------