TSTP Solution File: SWB012+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWB012+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:20:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 3.67s 3.91s
% Output : Refutation 3.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWB012+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 05:28:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.82/1.00 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.82/1.00 The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.82/1.00 Wed Jun 1 05:28:29 2022
% 0.82/1.00 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 19706.
% 0.82/1.00
% 0.82/1.00 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.82/1.00 set(auto).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.82/1.00 clear(print_given).
% 0.82/1.00
% 0.82/1.00 formula_list(usable).
% 0.82/1.00
% 0.82/1.00 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=15.
% 0.82/1.00
% 0.82/1.00 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.82/1.00 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.82/1.00 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.82/1.00
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.82/1.00 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.82/1.00
% 0.82/1.00 ------------> process usable:
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_complementOf,A,B)|ic(A).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_owl_complementOf,A,B)|ic(B).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 97 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdf_type,A,uri_rdf_Property)|ip(A).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,A,uri_rdf_Property)| -ip(A).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 120 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_domain,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,C).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 125 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_range,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,D).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 128 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)|ic(A).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 129 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)|ic(B).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,A,B)| -icext(A,C)|icext(B,C).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 133 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)|ip(A).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 134 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)|ip(B).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 135 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|iext(B,C,D).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 103 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -lv(A)|ir(A).
% 0.82/1.00 110 back subsumes 25.
% 0.82/1.00 110 back subsumes 16.
% 0.82/1.00 110 back subsumes 10.
% 0.82/1.00 110 back subsumes 5.
% 0.82/1.00 116 back subsumes 55.
% 0.82/1.00 116 back subsumes 46.
% 0.82/1.00 116 back subsumes 40.
% 0.82/1.00 116 back subsumes 37.
% 0.82/1.00 174 back subsumes 171.
% 0.82/1.00 204 back subsumes 194.
% 0.82/1.00 212 back subsumes 205.
% 0.82/1.00 212 back subsumes 195.
% 0.82/1.00 231 back subsumes 228.
% 0.82/1.00 259 back subsumes 249.
% 0.82/1.00 267 back subsumes 260.
% 0.82/1.00 267 back subsumes 250.
% 0.82/1.00 324 back subsumes 301.
% 0.82/1.00 332 back subsumes 312.
% 0.82/1.00 339 back subsumes 295.
% 0.82/1.00 427 back subsumes 404.
% 0.82/1.00 435 back subsumes 415.
% 0.82/1.00 442 back subsumes 398.
% 0.82/1.00 476 back subsumes 462.
% 0.82/1.00 480 back subsumes 467.
% 0.82/1.00 485 back subsumes 456.
% 0.82/1.00 562 back subsumes 548.
% 0.82/1.00 566 back subsumes 553.
% 0.82/1.00 571 back subsumes 542.
% 0.82/1.00
% 0.82/1.00 ------------> process sos:
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 607 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_rdf_type,uri_rdf_Property).
% 0.82/1.00 Following clause subsumed by 645 during input processing: 0 [] {-} iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_rdf_predicate,uri_rdfs_Resource).
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 590.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 154.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 109.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 103.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 100.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 99.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 95.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 94.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 93.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 83.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 79.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 78.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 71.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 70.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 68.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 8.
% 0.82/1.00 657 back subsumes 6.
% 0.82/1.00
% 0.82/1.00 ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.35/3.53
% 3.35/3.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.35/3.53
% 3.35/3.53
% 3.35/3.53 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 3.35/3.53
% 3.35/3.53
% 3.35/3.53
% 3.35/3.53 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 3.35/3.53
% 3.35/3.53 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 3.35/3.53 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 3.35/3.53 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 3.35/3.53 number of clauses in intial UL: 543
% 3.35/3.53 number of clauses initially in problem: 625
% 3.35/3.53 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 86
% 3.35/3.53 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 71
% 3.35/3.53 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 3.35/3.53 absolute distinct symbol count: 87
% 3.35/3.53 distinct predicate count: 11
% 3.35/3.53 distinct function count: 18
% 3.35/3.53 distinct constant count: 58
% 3.35/3.53
% 3.35/3.53 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 3.35/3.53
% 3.35/3.53
% 3.35/3.53
% 3.35/3.53 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 -------- PROOF --------
% 3.67/3.91 % SZS status Theorem
% 3.67/3.91 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 3.52 sec ----> 5171 [hyper,5068,162,3947] {-} $F.
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 5.
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.67/3.91 % SZS status Theorem
% 3.67/3.91 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 30 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdf_first,A,B)| -iext(uri_rdf_rest,A,C)| -iext(uri_rdf_first,C,D)| -iext(uri_rdf_rest,C,E)| -iext(uri_rdf_first,E,F)| -iext(uri_rdf_rest,E,uri_rdf_nil)| -iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,G,A)| -icext(G,H)|icext(D,H).
% 3.67/3.91 31 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdf_first,A,B)| -iext(uri_rdf_rest,A,C)| -iext(uri_rdf_first,C,D)| -iext(uri_rdf_rest,C,E)| -iext(uri_rdf_first,E,F)| -iext(uri_rdf_rest,E,uri_rdf_nil)| -iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,G,A)| -icext(G,H)|icext(F,H).
% 3.67/3.91 120 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdfs_domain,A,B)| -iext(A,C,D)|icext(B,C).
% 3.67/3.91 141 [] {+} -iext(uri_owl_hasValue,A,B)| -iext(uri_owl_onProperty,A,C)| -icext(A,D)|iext(C,D,B).
% 3.67/3.91 146 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdf_type,A,B)|icext(B,A).
% 3.67/3.91 147 [] {+} iext(uri_rdf_type,A,B)| -icext(B,A).
% 3.67/3.91 162 [] {+} -iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_name,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty)| -iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_alice,uri_foaf_Person).
% 3.67/3.91 659 [] {-} iext(uri_owl_intersectionOf,uri_ex_PersonAttribute,$c5).
% 3.67/3.91 660 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_first,$c5,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty).
% 3.67/3.91 661 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_rest,$c5,$c4).
% 3.67/3.91 662 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_first,$c4,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty).
% 3.67/3.91 663 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_rest,$c4,$c3).
% 3.67/3.91 664 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_first,$c3,$c2).
% 3.67/3.91 665 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_rest,$c3,uri_rdf_nil).
% 3.67/3.91 667 [] {-} iext(uri_owl_onProperty,$c2,uri_rdfs_domain).
% 3.67/3.91 668 [] {-} iext(uri_owl_hasValue,$c2,uri_foaf_Person).
% 3.67/3.91 669 [] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_name,uri_ex_PersonAttribute).
% 3.67/3.91 670 [] {-} iext(uri_ex_name,uri_ex_alice,literal_plain(dat_str_alice)).
% 3.67/3.91 3941 [hyper,669,146] {-} icext(uri_ex_PersonAttribute,uri_ex_name).
% 3.67/3.91 3942 [hyper,3941,31,660,661,662,663,664,665,659] {-} icext($c2,uri_ex_name).
% 3.67/3.91 3943 [hyper,3941,30,660,661,662,663,664,665,659] {-} icext(uri_owl_FunctionalProperty,uri_ex_name).
% 3.67/3.91 3946 [hyper,3942,141,668,667] {-} iext(uri_rdfs_domain,uri_ex_name,uri_foaf_Person).
% 3.67/3.91 3947 [hyper,3943,147] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_name,uri_owl_FunctionalProperty).
% 3.67/3.91 4963 [hyper,3946,120,670] {-} icext(uri_foaf_Person,uri_ex_alice).
% 3.67/3.91 5068 [hyper,4963,147] {-} iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_alice,uri_foaf_Person).
% 3.67/3.91 5171 [hyper,5068,162,3947] {-} $F.
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.67/3.91 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 ============ end of search ============
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.67/3.91
% 3.67/3.91 Process 19706 finished Wed Jun 1 05:28:32 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------