TSTP Solution File: SWB011+2 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWB011+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:20:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.44s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 8 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_owl_Class,uri_owl_ObjectProperty),
file('SWB011+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Class),
file('SWB011+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_ObjectProperty),
file('SWB011+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(6,axiom,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,u,v)
| icext(v,u) ),
file('SWB011+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
( ~ icext(u,v)
| ~ icext(w,v)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,w,u) ),
file('SWB011+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(15,plain,
icext(uri_owl_ObjectProperty,uri_ex_x),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,6]),
[iquote('0:Res:3.0,6.0')] ).
cnf(16,plain,
icext(uri_owl_Class,uri_ex_x),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,6]),
[iquote('0:Res:2.0,6.0')] ).
cnf(18,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_owl_ObjectProperty,u)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_Class,u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,8]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,8.2')] ).
cnf(19,plain,
~ icext(uri_owl_ObjectProperty,uri_ex_x),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[16,18]),
[iquote('0:Res:16.0,18.1')] ).
cnf(20,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[19,15]),
[iquote('0:MRR:19.0,15.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWB011+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 07:56:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.44 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS derived 7 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 16 clauses.
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS allocated 97700 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS spent 0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 10 :
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.44 Formulae used in the proof : testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes rdfs_cext_def owl_eqdis_disjointwith
% 0.18/0.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------