TSTP Solution File: SWB011+2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWB011+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:01:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWB011+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 06:57:53 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.61 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.64 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.53/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.64 % Transform :cnf
% 0.53/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.53/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.53/0.64
% 0.53/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.53/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.53/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.64 % File : SWB011+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.53/0.64 % Domain : Semantic Web
% 0.53/0.64 % Problem : Entity Types as Classes
% 0.53/0.64 % Version : [Sch11] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% 0.53/0.64 % English :
% 0.53/0.64
% 0.53/0.64 % Refs : [Sch11] Schneider, M. (2011), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.53/0.64 % Source : [Sch11]
% 0.53/0.64 % Names : 011_Entity_Types_as_Classes [Sch11]
% 0.53/0.64
% 0.53/0.64 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.53/0.64 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.25 v6.1.0, 0.00 v5.2.0
% 0.53/0.64 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.53/0.64 % Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% 0.53/0.64 % Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 3 avg)
% 0.53/0.64 % Number of connectives : 8 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 5 &)
% 0.53/0.64 % ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.53/0.64 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% 0.53/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.53/0.64 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.53/0.64 % Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.53/0.64 % Number of variables : 5 ( 5 !; 0 ?)
% 0.53/0.64 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ
% 0.53/0.64
% 0.53/0.64 % Comments :
% 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.64 fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
% 0.53/0.64 ! [X,C] :
% 0.53/0.64 ( iext(uri_rdf_type,X,C)
% 0.53/0.64 <=> icext(C,X) ) ).
% 0.53/0.64
% 0.53/0.64 fof(owl_eqdis_disjointwith,axiom,
% 0.53/0.64 ! [C1,C2] :
% 0.53/0.64 ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,C1,C2)
% 0.53/0.64 <=> ( ic(C1)
% 0.53/0.64 & ic(C2)
% 0.53/0.64 & ! [X] :
% 0.53/0.64 ~ ( icext(C1,X)
% 0.53/0.64 & icext(C2,X) ) ) ) ).
% 0.53/0.64
% 0.53/0.64 fof(testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes,axiom,
% 0.53/0.64 ( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_owl_Class,uri_owl_ObjectProperty)
% 0.53/0.64 & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Class)
% 0.53/0.64 & iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_ObjectProperty) ) ).
% 0.53/0.64
% 0.53/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.64 % Proof found
% 0.53/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.64 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.53/0.64 %ClaNum:10(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.53/0.64 %VarNum:34(SingletonVarNum:15)
% 0.53/0.65 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.53/0.65 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.53/0.65 %SharedTerms:8
% 0.53/0.65 [1]P1(a1,a2,a4)
% 0.53/0.65 [2]P1(a1,a2,a5)
% 0.53/0.65 [3]P1(a6,a4,a5)
% 0.53/0.65 [4]~P2(x42,x41)+P1(a1,x41,x42)
% 0.53/0.65 [5]P3(x51)+~P1(a6,x52,x51)
% 0.53/0.65 [6]P3(x61)+~P1(a6,x61,x62)
% 0.53/0.65 [7]P2(x71,x72)+~P1(a1,x72,x71)
% 0.53/0.65 [10]~P2(x101,x102)+~P2(x103,x102)+~P1(a6,x103,x101)
% 0.53/0.65 [8]~P3(x81)+~P3(x82)+P1(a6,x81,x82)+P2(x82,f3(x81,x82))
% 0.53/0.65 [9]~P3(x92)+~P3(x91)+P1(a6,x91,x92)+P2(x91,f3(x91,x92))
% 0.53/0.65 %EqnAxiom
% 0.53/0.65
% 0.53/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65 cnf(15,plain,
% 0.53/0.65 (~P2(a5,a2)),
% 0.53/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,7,6,5,10])).
% 0.53/0.65 cnf(21,plain,
% 0.53/0.65 ($false),
% 0.53/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,15,7]),
% 0.53/0.65 ['proof']).
% 0.53/0.65 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.53/0.65 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------