TSTP Solution File: SWB011+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SWB011+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nKT2sLHiDv true
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:15:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 8.91s 1.94s
% Output : Refutation 8.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 7 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 26 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 80 ( 9 ~; 5 |; 5 &; 59 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 6 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 ^; 13 !; 0 ?; 13 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(uri_owl_disjointWith_type,type,
uri_owl_disjointWith: $i ).
thf(uri_ex_x_type,type,
uri_ex_x: $i ).
thf(iext_type,type,
iext: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(ic_type,type,
ic: $i > $o ).
thf(uri_owl_Class_type,type,
uri_owl_Class: $i ).
thf(icext_type,type,
icext: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(uri_rdf_type_type,type,
uri_rdf_type: $i ).
thf(uri_owl_ObjectProperty_type,type,
uri_owl_ObjectProperty: $i ).
thf(testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes,axiom,
( ( iext @ uri_rdf_type @ uri_ex_x @ uri_owl_ObjectProperty )
& ( iext @ uri_rdf_type @ uri_ex_x @ uri_owl_Class )
& ( iext @ uri_owl_disjointWith @ uri_owl_Class @ uri_owl_ObjectProperty ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1218,plain,
iext @ uri_rdf_type @ uri_ex_x @ uri_owl_Class,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
thf(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X: $i,C: $i] :
( ( iext @ uri_rdf_type @ X @ C )
<=> ( icext @ C @ X ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl25,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( icext @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( iext @ uri_rdf_type @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[rdfs_cext_def]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1504,plain,
icext @ uri_owl_Class @ uri_ex_x,
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1218,zip_derived_cl25]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1219,plain,
iext @ uri_owl_disjointWith @ uri_owl_Class @ uri_owl_ObjectProperty,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
thf(owl_eqdis_disjointwith,axiom,
! [C1: $i,C2: $i] :
( ( iext @ uri_owl_disjointWith @ C1 @ C2 )
<=> ( ( ic @ C1 )
& ( ic @ C2 )
& ! [X: $i] :
~ ( ( icext @ C1 @ X )
& ( icext @ C2 @ X ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl852,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( icext @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( icext @ X2 @ X1 )
| ~ ( iext @ uri_owl_disjointWith @ X2 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[owl_eqdis_disjointwith]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2305,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( icext @ uri_owl_Class @ X0 )
| ~ ( icext @ uri_owl_ObjectProperty @ X0 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1219,zip_derived_cl852]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6716,plain,
~ ( icext @ uri_owl_ObjectProperty @ uri_ex_x ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1504,zip_derived_cl2305]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1217,plain,
iext @ uri_rdf_type @ uri_ex_x @ uri_owl_ObjectProperty,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl25_001,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( icext @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( iext @ uri_rdf_type @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[rdfs_cext_def]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1502,plain,
icext @ uri_owl_ObjectProperty @ uri_ex_x,
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1217,zip_derived_cl25]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6720,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl6716,zip_derived_cl1502]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SWB011+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nKT2sLHiDv true
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 07:36:17 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.30 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.30 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.30 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.30 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.10/0.31 % Running in FO mode
% 0.16/0.56 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.16/0.56 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.16/0.56 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.16/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.16/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.16/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.16/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.16/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.16/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.16/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.16/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.16/0.85 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo17_bce.sh running for 50s
% 0.16/0.86 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo8.sh running for 50s
% 8.91/1.94 % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 8.91/1.94 % done 1672 iterations in 1.196s
% 8.91/1.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 8.91/1.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 8.91/1.94
% 8.91/1.94
% 8.91/1.94 % Terminating...
% 9.59/2.13 % Runner terminated.
% 9.59/2.15 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------