TSTP Solution File: SWB011+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWB011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:58:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.80s 2.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 46 ( 18 ~; 16 |; 10 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_eqdis_disjointwith,axiom,
! [X13,X15] :
( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X13,X15)
<=> ( ic(X13)
& ic(X15)
& ! [X4] :
~ ( icext(X13,X4)
& icext(X15,X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_disjointwith) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X4,X5)
<=> icext(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_owl_Class,uri_owl_ObjectProperty)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Class)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_ObjectProperty) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X808,X809,X810,X811,X812] :
( ( ic(X808)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X808,X809) )
& ( ic(X809)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X808,X809) )
& ( ~ icext(X808,X810)
| ~ icext(X809,X810)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X808,X809) )
& ( icext(X811,esk115_2(X811,X812))
| ~ ic(X811)
| ~ ic(X812)
| iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X811,X812) )
& ( icext(X812,esk115_2(X811,X812))
| ~ ic(X811)
| ~ ic(X812)
| iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X811,X812) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_disjointwith])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X48,X49] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49)
| icext(X49,X48) )
& ( ~ icext(X49,X48)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X48,X49) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ icext(X1,X2)
| ~ icext(X3,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_owl_disjointWith,uri_owl_Class,uri_owl_ObjectProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_ObjectProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_x,uri_owl_Class),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_011_Entity_Types_as_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ icext(uri_owl_ObjectProperty,X1)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_Class,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
icext(uri_owl_ObjectProperty,uri_ex_x),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
icext(uri_owl_Class,uri_ex_x),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.08 % Problem : SWB011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.02/0.08 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.27 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.27 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.27 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.27 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 13:31:46 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.35 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.11/0.36 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.36 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.11/0.36 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.11/0.36 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 3.35/1.40 [LightGBM] [Fatal] Data file /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ug2_8_hc/test couldn't be read
% 3.35/1.41 [9932] Failed to execute script predict4sine1
% 3.35/1.41 Traceback (most recent call last):
% 3.35/1.41 File "predict4sine1.py", line 24, in <module>
% 3.35/1.41 File "site-packages/lightgbm/basic.py", line 1037, in construct
% 3.35/1.41 File "site-packages/lightgbm/basic.py", line 833, in _lazy_init
% 3.35/1.41 File "site-packages/lightgbm/basic.py", line 47, in _safe_call
% 3.35/1.41 lightgbm.basic.LightGBMError: Data file /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ug2_8_hc/test couldn't be read
% 4.80/2.10 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 4.80/2.10 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.80/2.10 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.80/2.10 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 4.80/2.10 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 4.80/2.10 #
% 4.80/2.10 # Preprocessing time : 0.055 s
% 4.80/2.10 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.80/2.10
% 4.80/2.10 # Proof found!
% 4.80/2.10 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.80/2.10 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.80/2.11 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.80/2.11
% 4.80/2.11 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.80/2.11 # User time : 0.228 s
% 4.80/2.11 # System time : 0.011 s
% 4.80/2.11 # Total time : 0.239 s
% 4.80/2.11 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.80/2.11
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------