TSTP Solution File: SWB008+2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWB008+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:37:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 62 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 65 ( 25 ~; 25 |; 11 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 8 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn; 17 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(owl_char_inversefunctional,axiom,
! [X4] :
( icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X4)
<=> ( ip(X4)
& ! [X5,X6,X3] :
( ( iext(X4,X5,X3)
& iext(X4,X6,X3) )
=> X5 = X6 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LTNUUkgxwj/E---3.1_4468.p',owl_char_inversefunctional) ).
fof(rdfs_cext_def,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)
<=> icext(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LTNUUkgxwj/E---3.1_4468.p',rdfs_cext_def) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)
& iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz))
& iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LTNUUkgxwj/E---3.1_4468.p',testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X1,X3] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X3)
<=> X1 = X3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LTNUUkgxwj/E---3.1_4468.p',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties,conjecture,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LTNUUkgxwj/E---3.1_4468.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X11,X12,X13,X14,X15] :
( ( ip(X11)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X11) )
& ( ~ iext(X11,X12,X14)
| ~ iext(X11,X13,X14)
| X12 = X13
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X11) )
& ( iext(X15,esk1_1(X15),esk3_1(X15))
| ~ ip(X15)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X15) )
& ( iext(X15,esk2_1(X15),esk3_1(X15))
| ~ ip(X15)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X15) )
& ( esk1_1(X15) != esk2_1(X15)
| ~ ip(X15)
| icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X15) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_char_inversefunctional])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X7,X8)
| icext(X8,X7) )
& ( ~ icext(X8,X7)
| iext(uri_rdf_type,X7,X8) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( X2 = X4
| ~ iext(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ icext(uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( icext(X2,X1)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,X3,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty)
| ~ iext(X3,X2,X4)
| ~ iext(X3,X1,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_owl_InverseFunctionalProperty),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X2,X3)
| ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_robert,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X9,X10] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X9,X10)
| X9 = X10 )
& ( X9 != X10
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X9,X10) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X1 = uri_ex_robert
| ~ iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,X1,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
iext(uri_foaf_mbox_sha1sum,uri_ex_bob,literal_plain(dat_str_xyz)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_008_Inverse_Functional_Data_Properties]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_bob,uri_ex_robert),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
uri_ex_robert = uri_ex_bob,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWB008+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:15:34 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LTNUUkgxwj/E---3.1_4468.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 4545 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 4552 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 14
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 22
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 22
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 16
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 15
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 10
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 851
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------