TSTP Solution File: SWB007+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB007+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:01:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.29s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 10 ~; 7 |; 8 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 9 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_007_Equal_Classes,conjecture,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_conclusion_fullish_007_Equal_Classes) ).
fof(owl_eqdis_sameas,axiom,
! [X4,X7] :
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X4,X7)
<=> X4 = X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax',owl_eqdis_sameas) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes,axiom,
( iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c1)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c1)
& iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2)
& iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_007_Equal_Classes]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X8,X9,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9)
| X8 = X9 )
& ( X8 != X9
| iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X8,X9) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_eqdis_sameas])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ iext(uri_owl_sameAs,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_owl_sameAs,uri_ex_c1,uri_ex_c2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c2)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
uri_ex_c2 = uri_ex_c1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_w,uri_ex_c1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_range,uri_ex_p,uri_ex_c1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_c1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_007_Equal_Classes]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_9]),c_0_11]),c_0_9]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWB007+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 14:25:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.29/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.29/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.29/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 0.29/1.45
% 0.29/1.45 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.29/1.45 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.29/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.29/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 521
% 0.29/1.45 # Initial clauses : 61
% 0.29/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.29/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 49
% 0.29/1.45 # Processed clauses : 438
% 0.29/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 22
% 0.29/1.45 # ...subsumed : 189
% 0.29/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 227
% 0.29/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Generated clauses : 632
% 0.29/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 389
% 0.29/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 48
% 0.29/1.45 # Paramodulations : 632
% 0.29/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 227
% 0.29/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 48
% 0.29/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 179
% 0.29/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.29/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.29/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16663
% 0.29/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5826
% 0.29/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 237
% 0.29/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 68
% 0.29/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.29/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18643
% 0.29/1.45
% 0.29/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/1.45 # User time : 0.061 s
% 0.29/1.45 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.29/1.45 # Total time : 0.063 s
% 0.29/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 4524 pages
% 0.29/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.29/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.090 s
% 0.29/1.45
% 0.29/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.29/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.29/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.29/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 0.29/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 0.29/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 0.29/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.29/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.29/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.29/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.29/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.29/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.29/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 0.29/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.29/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.29/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Initial clauses : 1271
% 0.29/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 0.29/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1160
% 0.29/1.45 # Processed clauses : 1161
% 0.29/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.29/1.45 # ...subsumed : 56
% 0.29/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 1102
% 0.29/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 0.29/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 0.29/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.29/1.45 # Generated clauses : 36971
% 0.29/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 36806
% 0.29/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 88
% 0.29/1.45 # Paramodulations : 36943
% 0.29/1.45 # Factorizations : 12
% 0.29/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 16
% 0.29/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 1078
% 0.29/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 205
% 0.29/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.29/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 870
% 0.29/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 36701
% 0.29/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 297450
% 0.29/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.29/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 515288
% 0.29/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24906
% 0.29/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 150
% 0.29/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1032
% 0.29/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 23
% 0.29/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.29/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.29/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 824753
% 0.29/1.45
% 0.29/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/1.45 # User time : 0.682 s
% 0.29/1.45 # System time : 0.034 s
% 0.29/1.45 # Total time : 0.716 s
% 0.29/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 47488 pages
% 0.29/23.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.29/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.29/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.29/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.29/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.29/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.29/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.29/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.29/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.29/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.29/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.29/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------