TSTP Solution File: SWB003+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWB003+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:58:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.96s 2.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_91,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ba4eu2u/input.p',i_0_91) ).
cnf(i_0_90,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ba4eu2u/input.p',i_0_90) ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
i_0_91 ).
cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X1),
i_0_90 ).
cnf(c_0_96,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_95]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWB003+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 08:42:35 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.96/2.48 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 7.96/2.48 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.96/2.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 7.96/2.48
% 7.96/2.48 # Proof found!
% 7.96/2.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.96/2.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.96/2.48 # Proof object total steps : 5
% 7.96/2.48 # Proof object clause steps : 3
% 7.96/2.48 # Proof object formula steps : 2
% 7.96/2.48 # Proof object conjectures : 2
% 7.96/2.48 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 7.96/2.48 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 7.96/2.48 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 7.96/2.48 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 7.96/2.48 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 7.96/2.48 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.96/2.48 # Parsed axioms : 88
% 7.96/2.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Initial clauses : 88
% 7.96/2.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 88
% 7.96/2.48 # Processed clauses : 13
% 7.96/2.48 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 7.96/2.48 # ...subsumed : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 7.96/2.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Generated clauses : 4
% 7.96/2.48 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 3
% 7.96/2.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Paramodulations : 4
% 7.96/2.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 7.96/2.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 7.96/2.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 7.96/2.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 7.96/2.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 78
% 7.96/2.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 101
% 7.96/2.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.96/2.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1057
% 7.96/2.48
% 7.96/2.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.96/2.48 # User time : 0.010 s
% 7.96/2.48 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.96/2.48 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 7.96/2.48 # ...preprocessing : 0.013 s
% 7.96/2.48 # ...main loop : 0.000 s
% 7.96/2.48 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.96/2.48
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------