TSTP Solution File: SWB003+3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWB003+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:37:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    7 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   1 sgn;   1   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals,conjecture,
    ? [X21] : iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X21),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YKkThQyxbN/E---3.1_31269.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals) ).

fof(testcase_premise_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals,axiom,
    iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YKkThQyxbN/E---3.1_31269.p',testcase_premise_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X21] : iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X21),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X22] : ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X22),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,literal_plain(dat_str_foo)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_003_Blank_Nodes_for_Literals]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : SWB003+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 20:22:43 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YKkThQyxbN/E---3.1_31269.p
% 0.20/0.49  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # sh5l with pid 31350 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FGHNF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S with pid 31361 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FGHNF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 140
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 41
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 194
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 194
% 0.20/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 13
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 10
% 0.20/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.20/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 181
% 0.20/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 726
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 11655
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 2464 pages
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
% 0.20/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------