TSTP Solution File: SWB002+4 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWB002+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:37:27 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 408.26s 300.20s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn; 2 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes,conjecture,
? [X11,X12] :
( iext(uri_ex_p,X11,X12)
& iext(uri_ex_q,X12,X11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qoPDeTyHsu/E---3.1_11650.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes,axiom,
? [X13] :
( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,X13)
& iext(uri_ex_q,X13,uri_ex_s) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qoPDeTyHsu/E---3.1_11650.p',testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X11,X12] :
( iext(uri_ex_p,X11,X12)
& iext(uri_ex_q,X12,X11) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X14,X15] :
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X14,X15)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_q,X15,X14) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,esk1_0)
& iext(uri_ex_q,esk1_0,uri_ex_s) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_002_Existential_Blank_Nodes])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_ex_p,X1,X2)
| ~ iext(uri_ex_q,X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_ex_q,esk1_0,uri_ex_s),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
iext(uri_ex_p,uri_ex_s,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWB002+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:23:25 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qoPDeTyHsu/E---3.1_11650.p
% 408.26/300.20 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 408.26/300.20 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 408.26/300.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # sh5l with pid 11731 completed with status 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Result found by sh5l
% 408.26/300.20 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 408.26/300.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 408.26/300.20 # Search class: FHHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 408.26/300.20 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 11734 completed with status 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 408.26/300.20 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 408.26/300.20 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 408.26/300.20 # Search class: FHHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 408.26/300.20 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 408.26/300.20 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 408.26/300.20 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 408.26/300.20 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 408.26/300.20
% 408.26/300.20 # Proof found!
% 408.26/300.20 # SZS status Theorem
% 408.26/300.20 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 408.26/300.20 # Parsed axioms : 82
% 408.26/300.20 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23
% 408.26/300.20 # Initial clauses : 69
% 408.26/300.20 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Initial clauses in saturation : 69
% 408.26/300.20 # Processed clauses : 79
% 408.26/300.20 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 408.26/300.20 # ...subsumed : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # ...remaining for further processing : 76
% 408.26/300.20 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Generated clauses : 3
% 408.26/300.20 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Paramodulations : 3
% 408.26/300.20 # Factorizations : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # NegExts : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 408.26/300.20 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Propositional check models : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 408.26/300.20 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 408.26/300.20 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 408.26/300.20 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 408.26/300.20 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 408.26/300.20 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 408.26/300.20 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 408.26/300.20 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 408.26/300.20 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 408.26/300.20 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 56
% 408.26/300.20 # ...number of literals in the above : 82
% 408.26/300.20 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Current number of archived clauses : 66
% 408.26/300.20 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 74
% 408.26/300.20 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69
% 408.26/300.20 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 408.26/300.20 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 408.26/300.20 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Condensation successes : 0
% 408.26/300.20 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2631
% 408.26/300.20
% 408.26/300.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.26/300.20 # User time : 0.006 s
% 408.26/300.20 # System time : 0.002 s
% 408.26/300.20 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 408.26/300.20 # Maximum resident set size: 1912 pages
% 408.26/300.20
% 408.26/300.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 408.26/300.20 # User time : 0.009 s
% 408.26/300.20 # System time : 0.003 s
% 408.26/300.20 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 408.26/300.20 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 408.26/300.20 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------