TSTP Solution File: SWB001+3 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWB001+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:37:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 136.43s 300.12s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 9 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment,conjecture,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.C9q9yhWEKe/E---3.1_9596.p',testcase_conclusion_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_r)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_owl_someValuesFrom,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_d) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.C9q9yhWEKe/E---3.1_9596.p',testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWB001+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.16/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:27:31 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.51 Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.C9q9yhWEKe/E---3.1_9596.p
% 136.43/300.12 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 136.43/300.12 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 136.43/300.12 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # sh5l with pid 9676 completed with status 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Result found by sh5l
% 136.43/300.12 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 136.43/300.12 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 136.43/300.12 # Search class: FGHNF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 136.43/300.12 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S with 163s (1) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S with pid 9679 completed with status 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Result found by G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S
% 136.43/300.12 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 136.43/300.12 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 136.43/300.12 # Search class: FGHNF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 136.43/300.12 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 136.43/300.12 # Starting G-E--_207_C41_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S4S with 163s (1) cores
% 136.43/300.12 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 136.43/300.12
% 136.43/300.12 # Proof found!
% 136.43/300.12 # SZS status Theorem
% 136.43/300.12 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 136.43/300.12 # Parsed axioms : 140
% 136.43/300.12 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 29
% 136.43/300.12 # Initial clauses : 212
% 136.43/300.12 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Initial clauses in saturation : 212
% 136.43/300.12 # Processed clauses : 4
% 136.43/300.12 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # ...subsumed : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 136.43/300.12 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Generated clauses : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Paramodulations : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Factorizations : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # NegExts : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 136.43/300.12 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Propositional check models : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 136.43/300.12 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 136.43/300.12 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 136.43/300.12 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 136.43/300.12 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 136.43/300.12 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 136.43/300.12 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 136.43/300.12 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 136.43/300.12 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 208
% 136.43/300.12 # ...number of literals in the above : 763
% 136.43/300.12 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Condensation successes : 0
% 136.43/300.12 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12050
% 136.43/300.12
% 136.43/300.12 # -------------------------------------------------
% 136.43/300.12 # User time : 0.012 s
% 136.43/300.12 # System time : 0.006 s
% 136.43/300.12 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 136.43/300.12 # Maximum resident set size: 2496 pages
% 136.43/300.12
% 136.43/300.12 # -------------------------------------------------
% 136.43/300.12 # User time : 0.015 s
% 136.43/300.12 # System time : 0.009 s
% 136.43/300.12 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 136.43/300.12 # Maximum resident set size: 1816 pages
% 136.43/300.12 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------