TSTP Solution File: SWB001+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWB001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 19:01:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 6 ~; 2 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 9 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(testcase_conclusion_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment,conjecture,
( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_conclusion_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) ).
fof(testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment,axiom,
( iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_ex_c,uri_ex_r)
& iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p)
& iext(uri_owl_someValuesFrom,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_d) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
& iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[testcase_conclusion_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction)
| ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p)
| ~ iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_r,uri_owl_Restriction),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[testcase_premise_fullish_001_Subgraph_Entailment]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ iext(uri_owl_onProperty,uri_ex_r,uri_ex_p),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWB001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 13:42:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.27/1.45 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 517
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 62
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 50
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 369
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 21
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 128
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 220
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 537
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 319
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 24
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 537
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 220
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 57
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 163
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6020
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2035
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 152
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 12
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 16492
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.049 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.052 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 4504 pages
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.091 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 560
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 1271
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 111
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1160
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 12
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1148
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 5182
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 82659
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.081 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.092 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 6836 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------