TSTP Solution File: SEV397^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEV397^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:13:39 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.32s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   3 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  359 ( 109 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   28 (  14 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  297 (  51   ~;  67   |;  40   &; 130   @)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   5   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0   ^   4   !;   4   ?;   9   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cZ: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    cY: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    cX: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK0: a ).

thf(f58,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f42,f53,f54,f56]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f24,f44,f35]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> ( $true
      = ( cX @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( spl1_3
  <=> ( $true
      = ( cY @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_3])]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cX @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cY @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cY @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cX @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cX @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cY @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( $true
           != ( cY @ sK0 ) )
          | ( $true
           != ( cX @ sK0 ) ) )
        & ( $true
         != ( cZ @ sK0 ) ) )
      | ( ( $true
         != ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
        & ( $true
         != ( cX @ sK0 ) ) )
      | ( ( $true
         != ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
        & ( $true
         != ( cY @ sK0 ) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( $true
          = ( cY @ sK0 ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( cX @ sK0 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
      | ( ( ( $true
            = ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
          | ( $true
            = ( cX @ sK0 ) ) )
        & ( ( $true
            = ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
          | ( $true
            = ( cY @ sK0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f8,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( ( ( ( cY @ X0 )
               != $true )
              | ( ( cX @ X0 )
               != $true ) )
            & ( ( cZ @ X0 )
             != $true ) )
          | ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( cX @ X0 )
             != $true ) )
          | ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
             != $true )
            & ( ( cY @ X0 )
             != $true ) ) )
        & ( ( ( ( cY @ X0 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( cX @ X0 )
              = $true ) )
          | ( ( cZ @ X0 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
                = $true )
              | ( ( cX @ X0 )
                = $true ) )
            & ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
                = $true )
              | ( ( cY @ X0 )
                = $true ) ) ) ) )
   => ( ( ( ( ( $true
             != ( cY @ sK0 ) )
            | ( $true
             != ( cX @ sK0 ) ) )
          & ( $true
           != ( cZ @ sK0 ) ) )
        | ( ( $true
           != ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
          & ( $true
           != ( cX @ sK0 ) ) )
        | ( ( $true
           != ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
          & ( $true
           != ( cY @ sK0 ) ) ) )
      & ( ( ( $true
            = ( cY @ sK0 ) )
          & ( $true
            = ( cX @ sK0 ) ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
        | ( ( ( $true
              = ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
            | ( $true
              = ( cX @ sK0 ) ) )
          & ( ( $true
              = ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
            | ( $true
              = ( cY @ sK0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a] :
      ( ( ( ( ( ( cY @ X0 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( cX @ X0 )
             != $true ) )
          & ( ( cZ @ X0 )
           != $true ) )
        | ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( cX @ X0 )
           != $true ) )
        | ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( cY @ X0 )
           != $true ) ) )
      & ( ( ( ( cY @ X0 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( cX @ X0 )
            = $true ) )
        | ( ( cZ @ X0 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( cX @ X0 )
              = $true ) )
          & ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( cY @ X0 )
              = $true ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a] :
      ( ( ( ( ( ( cY @ X0 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( cX @ X0 )
             != $true ) )
          & ( ( cZ @ X0 )
           != $true ) )
        | ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( cX @ X0 )
           != $true ) )
        | ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
           != $true )
          & ( ( cY @ X0 )
           != $true ) ) )
      & ( ( ( ( cY @ X0 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( cX @ X0 )
            = $true ) )
        | ( ( cZ @ X0 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( cX @ X0 )
              = $true ) )
          & ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( cY @ X0 )
              = $true ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a] :
      ( ( ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( cX @ X0 )
            = $true ) )
        & ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( cY @ X0 )
            = $true ) ) )
    <~> ( ( ( ( cY @ X0 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( cX @ X0 )
            = $true ) )
        | ( ( cZ @ X0 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( cX @ X0 )
              = $true ) )
          & ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( cY @ X0 )
              = $true ) ) )
      <=> ( ( ( ( cY @ X0 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( cX @ X0 )
              = $true ) )
          | ( ( cZ @ X0 )
            = $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
          | ( ( cX @ X0 )
            & ( cY @ X0 ) ) )
      <=> ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
            | ( cX @ X0 ) )
          & ( ( cZ @ X0 )
            | ( cY @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a] :
        ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
          | ( ( cX @ X0 )
            & ( cY @ X0 ) ) )
      <=> ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
            | ( cX @ X0 ) )
          & ( ( cZ @ X0 )
            | ( cY @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a] :
      ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
        | ( ( cX @ X0 )
          & ( cY @ X0 ) ) )
    <=> ( ( ( cZ @ X0 )
          | ( cX @ X0 ) )
        & ( ( cZ @ X0 )
          | ( cY @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM59_pme) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ~ spl1_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f26,f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> ( $true
      = ( cZ @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( cZ @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( cZ @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( spl1_3
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f27,f39,f44]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cY @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cZ @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cY @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cY @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f33,f39,f35]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cX @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cZ @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cX @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cZ @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cX @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( cZ @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : SEV397^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.10  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 18:38:37 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.10/0.30  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.10/0.30  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.32  % (2552)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2553)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2551)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2555)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2556)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2557)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2554)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2558)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2554)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.32  % (2554)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2554)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2554)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.32  % (2554)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.32  
% 0.15/0.32  % (2555)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.32  % (2555)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2555)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2555)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.32  % (2555)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.32  
% 0.15/0.32  % (2555)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.32  % (2555)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.32  % (2555)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2555)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2555)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2554)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.32  % (2554)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.32  % (2554)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2553)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.32  % (2554)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2554)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2556)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.32  % (2558)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.32  % (2558)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2558)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2558)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.32  % (2558)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.32  
% 0.15/0.32  % (2558)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.32  % (2558)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.32  % (2558)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2558)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2558)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2551)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.32  % (2553)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.32  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.32  % (2553)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2553)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2553)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.32  
% 0.15/0.32  % (2553)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.32  % (2553)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.32  % (2553)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.32  % (2553)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2553)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.32  % (2550)Success in time 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.32  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------