TSTP Solution File: SEV365^5 by Refute---2015
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Refute---2015
% Problem : SEV365^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : isabelle tptp_refute %d %s
% Computer : n134.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Apr 14 04:28:38 EDT 2016
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 8.09s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEV365^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_refute %d %s
% 0.02/0.23 % Computer : n134.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB
% 0.02/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23 % DateTime : Fri Apr 8 11:31:35 CDT 2016
% 0.02/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 6.28/5.86 > val it = (): unit
% 6.47/6.05 Trying to find a model that refutes: bnd_cGVB_HOMOM bnd_h bnd_s1 bnd_f1 bnd_s2 bnd_f2 =
% 6.47/6.05 (((bnd_cGVB_CLOSED bnd_s1 bnd_f1 & bnd_cGVB_CLOSED bnd_s2 bnd_f2) &
% 6.47/6.05 bnd_cGVB_MAPS bnd_h bnd_s1 bnd_s2) &
% 6.47/6.05 (ALL Xx Xy.
% 6.47/6.05 bnd_cGVB_IN Xx bnd_s1 & bnd_cGVB_IN Xy bnd_s1 -->
% 6.47/6.05 bnd_cGVB_APPLY bnd_h (bnd_cGVB_APP2 bnd_f1 Xx Xy) =
% 6.47/6.05 bnd_cGVB_APP2 bnd_f2 (bnd_cGVB_APPLY bnd_h Xx)
% 6.47/6.05 (bnd_cGVB_APPLY bnd_h Xy)))
% 6.68/6.23 Unfolded term: bnd_cGVB_HOMOM bnd_h bnd_s1 bnd_f1 bnd_s2 bnd_f2 =
% 6.68/6.23 (((bnd_cGVB_CLOSED bnd_s1 bnd_f1 & bnd_cGVB_CLOSED bnd_s2 bnd_f2) &
% 6.68/6.23 bnd_cGVB_MAPS bnd_h bnd_s1 bnd_s2) &
% 6.68/6.23 (ALL Xx Xy.
% 6.68/6.23 bnd_cGVB_IN Xx bnd_s1 & bnd_cGVB_IN Xy bnd_s1 -->
% 6.68/6.23 bnd_cGVB_APPLY bnd_h (bnd_cGVB_APP2 bnd_f1 Xx Xy) =
% 6.68/6.23 bnd_cGVB_APP2 bnd_f2 (bnd_cGVB_APPLY bnd_h Xx)
% 6.68/6.23 (bnd_cGVB_APPLY bnd_h Xy)))
% 6.68/6.23 Adding axioms...
% 6.68/6.24 Typedef.type_definition_def
% 7.48/7.02 ...done.
% 7.48/7.02 Ground types: ?'b, TPTP_Interpret.ind
% 7.48/7.02 Translating term (sizes: 1, 1) ...
% 7.98/7.58 Invoking SAT solver...
% 8.09/7.61 Model found:
% 8.09/7.61 Size of types: ?'b: 1, TPTP_Interpret.ind: 1
% 8.09/7.61 bnd_cGVB_APP2: {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0,
% 8.09/7.61 {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0,
% 8.09/7.61 {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0, ??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0)})})}
% 8.09/7.61 bnd_cGVB_APPLY: {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0,
% 8.09/7.61 {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0, ??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0)})}
% 8.09/7.61 bnd_cGVB_IN: {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0, {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0, False)})}
% 8.09/7.61 bnd_cGVB_MAPS: {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0,
% 8.09/7.61 {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0, {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0, True)})})}
% 8.09/7.61 bnd_cGVB_CLOSED: {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0, {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0, True)})}
% 8.09/7.61 bnd_f2: ??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0
% 8.09/7.61 bnd_s2: ??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0
% 8.09/7.61 bnd_f1: ??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0
% 8.09/7.61 bnd_s1: ??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0
% 8.09/7.61 bnd_h: ??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0
% 8.09/7.61 bnd_cGVB_HOMOM: {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0,
% 8.09/7.61 {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0,
% 8.09/7.61 {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0,
% 8.09/7.61 {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0, {(??.TPTP_Interpret.ind0, False)})})})})}
% 8.09/7.61
% 8.09/7.61 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------