TSTP Solution File: SEV290^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEV290^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:12:40 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 4 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 13 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 48 ( 7 ~; 0 |; 4 &; 32 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 66 ( 66 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 2 ^ 8 !; 6 ?; 17 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
c0: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
cSUCC: ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
c_less__eq_: ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_16,type,
sK0: ( ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_18,type,
sK2: ( ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o ) > ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_19,type,
ph3:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(f35,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f34]) ).
thf(f34,plain,
$false = $true,
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f32]) ).
thf(f32,plain,
( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: ( $i > $o ) > $o] : $false
@ ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: ( $i > $o ) > $o] : $false ) ) ),
inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f16]) ).
thf(f16,plain,
! [X0: ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
thf(f14,plain,
! [X0: ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
= $true )
& ( $true
!= ( c_less__eq_ @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ c0 ) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f12,f13]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
! [X0: ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o] :
( ? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( $true
= ( X0 @ X1 ) )
& ( $true
!= ( c_less__eq_ @ X1 @ c0 ) ) )
=> ( ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
= $true )
& ( $true
!= ( c_less__eq_ @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ c0 ) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
! [X0: ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o] :
? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( $true
= ( X0 @ X1 ) )
& ( $true
!= ( c_less__eq_ @ X1 @ c0 ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
~ ? [X0: ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o] :
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( $true
= ( X0 @ X1 ) )
=> ( $true
= ( c_less__eq_ @ X1 @ c0 ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
~ ? [X0: ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o] :
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X0 @ X1 )
=> ( c_less__eq_ @ X1 @ c0 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X6: ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o] :
! [X2: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X6 @ X2 )
=> ( c_less__eq_ @ X2 @ c0 ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3]) ).
thf(f3,conjecture,
? [X6: ( ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $o] :
! [X2: ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X6 @ X2 )
=> ( c_less__eq_ @ X2 @ c0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBLEDSOE1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SEV290^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 18:22:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.39 % (6205)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6205)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.39 % (6205)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6205)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6205)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.39 % (6205)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (6205)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.22/0.39 % (6205)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (6206)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6205)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6205)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6205)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6206)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.39 % (6206)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6206)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6206)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.39 % (6206)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (6206)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.22/0.39 % (6206)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (6206)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6206)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6206)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6204)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6202)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6203)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6208)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6207)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6204)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.39 % (6204)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6204)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6204)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (6202)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (6204)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.39 % (6204)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (6204)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6204)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6204)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6209)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6207)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.39 % (6203)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.39 % (6203)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6203)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6203)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.39 % (6203)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (6203)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.39 % (6203)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (6203)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6202)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.39 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.39 % (6202)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6202)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6202)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (6202)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.39 % (6202)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (6202)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (6202)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6202)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (6199)Success in time 0.021 s
% 0.22/0.39 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------