TSTP Solution File: SEV233^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEV233^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:12:28 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.34s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SEV233^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Sun May 19 19:51:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.32 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.12/0.32 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.34 % (3588)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3591)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3593)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3594)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3590)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3591)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.18/0.34 % (3591)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3591)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3591)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.18/0.34 % (3591)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.18/0.34
% 0.18/0.34 % (3591)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.18/0.34 % (3591)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.34 % (3591)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3591)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3591)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3594)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.18/0.34 % (3594)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3594)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3590)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.18/0.34 % (3590)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3590)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3590)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.18/0.34 % (3590)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.18/0.34
% 0.18/0.34 % (3590)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.18/0.34 % (3590)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.34 % (3590)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3590)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3590)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3594)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.18/0.34 % (3594)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.18/0.34
% 0.18/0.34 % (3594)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.18/0.34 % (3594)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.34 % (3594)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3594)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3594)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3593)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.34 % (3589)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3588)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.18/0.34 % (3593)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.34 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.34 thf(func_def_0, type, cE: $i > $o).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(func_def_1, type, cD: $i > $o).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(func_def_5, type, sK0: $i > $o).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f50,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 $false),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f26,f31,f36,f37,f43,f49])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f49,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 spl3_1 | ~spl3_3),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f48])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f48,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 $false | (spl3_1 | ~spl3_3)),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f46,f21])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f21,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true != (cE @ sK1)) | spl3_1),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f19])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f19,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 spl3_1 <=> ($true = (cE @ sK1))),
% 0.18/0.34 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f46,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true = (cE @ sK1)) | ~spl3_3),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f45])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f45,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true != $true) | ($true = (cE @ sK1)) | ~spl3_3),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(superposition,[],[f12,f30])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f30,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true = (sK0 @ sK1)) | ~spl3_3),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f28])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f28,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 spl3_3 <=> ($true = (sK0 @ sK1))),
% 0.18/0.34 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ( ! [X3 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X3) != $true) | ($true = (cE @ X3))) )),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ((($true = (sK0 @ sK1)) & ($true != (cE @ sK1))) | (($true = (sK0 @ sK2)) & ($true != (cD @ sK2)))) & ! [X3] : ((($true = (cD @ X3)) & ($true = (cE @ X3))) | ((sK0 @ X3) != $true))),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f10,f9,f8])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ? [X0 : $i > $o] : ((? [X1] : (((X0 @ X1) = $true) & ((cE @ X1) != $true)) | ? [X2] : (($true = (X0 @ X2)) & ($true != (cD @ X2)))) & ! [X3] : ((($true = (cD @ X3)) & ($true = (cE @ X3))) | ((X0 @ X3) != $true))) => ((? [X1] : (($true = (sK0 @ X1)) & ((cE @ X1) != $true)) | ? [X2] : (($true = (sK0 @ X2)) & ($true != (cD @ X2)))) & ! [X3] : ((($true = (cD @ X3)) & ($true = (cE @ X3))) | ((sK0 @ X3) != $true)))),
% 0.18/0.34 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ? [X1] : (($true = (sK0 @ X1)) & ((cE @ X1) != $true)) => (($true = (sK0 @ sK1)) & ($true != (cE @ sK1)))),
% 0.18/0.34 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ? [X2] : (($true = (sK0 @ X2)) & ($true != (cD @ X2))) => (($true = (sK0 @ sK2)) & ($true != (cD @ sK2)))),
% 0.18/0.34 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ? [X0 : $i > $o] : ((? [X1] : (((X0 @ X1) = $true) & ((cE @ X1) != $true)) | ? [X2] : (($true = (X0 @ X2)) & ($true != (cD @ X2)))) & ! [X3] : ((($true = (cD @ X3)) & ($true = (cE @ X3))) | ((X0 @ X3) != $true)))),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(rectify,[],[f6])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ? [X0 : $i > $o] : ((? [X2] : (($true = (X0 @ X2)) & ($true != (cE @ X2))) | ? [X3] : (((X0 @ X3) = $true) & ($true != (cD @ X3)))) & ! [X1] : ((((cD @ X1) = $true) & ((cE @ X1) = $true)) | ((X0 @ X1) != $true)))),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : (((X0 @ X1) = $true) => (((cD @ X1) = $true) & ((cE @ X1) = $true))) => (! [X2] : (($true = (X0 @ X2)) => ($true = (cE @ X2))) & ! [X3] : (((X0 @ X3) = $true) => ($true = (cD @ X3)))))),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) => ((cE @ X1) & (cD @ X1))) => (! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) => (cE @ X2)) & ! [X3] : ((X0 @ X3) => (cD @ X3))))),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.18/0.34 ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) => ((cE @ X1) & (cD @ X1))) => (! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) => (cE @ X1)) & ! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) => (cD @ X1))))),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.18/0.34 ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) => ((cE @ X1) & (cD @ X1))) => (! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) => (cE @ X1)) & ! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) => (cD @ X1))))),
% 0.18/0.34 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM46_pme)).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f43,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ~spl3_2 | spl3_4),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f42])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f42,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 $false | (~spl3_2 | spl3_4)),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f41,f35])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f35,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true != (cD @ sK2)) | spl3_4),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f33])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f33,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 spl3_4 <=> ($true = (cD @ sK2))),
% 0.18/0.34 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_4])])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f41,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true = (cD @ sK2)) | ~spl3_2),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f40])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f40,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true = (cD @ sK2)) | ($true != $true) | ~spl3_2),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(superposition,[],[f13,f25])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f25,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true = (sK0 @ sK2)) | ~spl3_2),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f23])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f23,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 spl3_2 <=> ($true = (sK0 @ sK2))),
% 0.18/0.34 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ( ! [X3 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X3) != $true) | ($true = (cD @ X3))) )),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f37,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ~spl3_4 | ~spl3_1),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f14,f19,f33])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true != (cE @ sK1)) | ($true != (cD @ sK2))),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f36,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ~spl3_4 | spl3_3),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f16,f28,f33])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true != (cD @ sK2)) | ($true = (sK0 @ sK1))),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f31,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 spl3_3 | spl3_2),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f17,f23,f28])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true = (sK0 @ sK1)) | ($true = (sK0 @ sK2))),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f26,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ~spl3_1 | spl3_2),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f15,f23,f19])).
% 0.18/0.34 thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.18/0.34 ($true != (cE @ sK1)) | ($true = (sK0 @ sK2))),
% 0.18/0.34 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.18/0.34 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.34 % (3593)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3593)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3593)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.34
% 0.18/0.34 % (3593)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.18/0.34 % (3593)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.34 % (3593)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.18/0.34 % (3593)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3593)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.34 % (3586)Success in time 0.014 s
% 0.18/0.34 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------