TSTP Solution File: SEV229^5 by Leo-III---1.7.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.12
% Problem  : SEV229^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:10:11 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 6.77s 2.34s
% Output   : Refutation 6.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   64 (   6 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  271 (  50 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  507 ( 114   ~; 135   |;  14   &; 223   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  21  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (  11   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   8   ^  36   !;   0   ?;  44   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(cE_type,type,
    cE: a > $o ).

thf(cD_type,type,
    cD: a > $o ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: a > $o ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: a ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: a ).

thf(sk4_type,type,
    sk4: a ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [A: a > $o] :
        ! [B: a] :
          ( ( A @ B )
         => ( ( cD @ B )
            & ( cE @ B ) ) ) )
    = ( ^ [A: a > $o] :
          ( ! [B: a] :
              ( ( A @ B )
             => ( cD @ B ) )
          & ! [B: a] :
              ( ( A @ B )
             => ( cE @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cX5209_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [A: a > $o] :
        ! [B: a] :
          ( ( A @ B )
         => ( ( cD @ B )
            & ( cE @ B ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: a > $o] :
          ( ! [B: a] :
              ( ( A @ B )
             => ( cD @ B ) )
          & ! [B: a] :
              ( ( A @ B )
             => ( cE @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: a > $o] :
        ! [B: a] :
          ( ( A @ B )
         => ( ( cD @ B )
            & ( cE @ B ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: a > $o] :
          ( ! [B: a] :
              ( ( A @ B )
             => ( cD @ B ) )
          & ! [B: a] :
              ( ( A @ B )
             => ( cE @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: a > $o] :
        ! [B: a] :
          ( ( A @ B )
         => ( ( cD @ B )
            & ( cE @ B ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: a > $o] :
          ( ! [B: a] :
              ( ( A @ B )
             => ( cD @ B ) )
          & ! [B: a] :
              ( ( A @ B )
             => ( cE @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( ! [A: a] :
          ( ( sk1 @ A )
         => ( ( cD @ A )
            & ( cE @ A ) ) ) )
   != ( ! [A: a] :
          ( ( sk1 @ A )
         => ( cD @ A ) )
      & ! [A: a] :
          ( ( sk1 @ A )
         => ( cE @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ~ ! [A: a] :
          ( ( sk1 @ A )
         => ( ( cD @ A )
            & ( cE @ A ) ) )
    | ~ ( ! [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
           => ( cD @ A ) )
        & ! [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
           => ( cE @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ! [A: a] :
        ( ( sk1 @ A )
       => ( ( cD @ A )
          & ( cE @ A ) ) )
    | ( ! [A: a] :
          ( ( sk1 @ A )
         => ( cD @ A ) )
      & ! [A: a] :
          ( ( sk1 @ A )
         => ( cE @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ B )
      | ( cD @ B )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( cE @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[7]) ).

thf(101,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ( cD @ B )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( cE @ A )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
       != ( sk1 @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[15,18]) ).

thf(102,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ( cD @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( cE @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[101:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( sk4 ))]]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ~ ( cD @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ~ ( cD @ sk3 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ( ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 )
    | ( ( cD @ sk3 )
     != ( cD @ sk2 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ( ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 )
    | ( sk3 != sk2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk3 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( sk4 != sk3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( sk4 != sk3 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk2 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( sk4 != sk3 )
    | ( sk3 != sk2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[37]) ).

thf(254,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ( cD @ sk4 )
      | ( cE @ A )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[15,102]) ).

thf(255,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( cD @ sk4 )
    | ( cE @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[254:[bind(A,$thf( sk4 ))]]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6]) ).

thf(62,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk3 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ~ ( cD @ sk3 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk2 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( sk4 != sk2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( sk4 != sk2 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk2 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( sk4 != sk2 )
    | ( sk3 != sk2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[40]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ B )
      | ( cD @ B )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( cD @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[7]) ).

thf(387,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ B )
      | ( cD @ B )
      | ( cD @ A )
      | ( ( sk1 @ A )
       != ( sk1 @ B ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(388,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( cD @ A )
      | ( cD @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[387:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(390,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( cD @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[388]) ).

thf(416,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( sk4 != sk3 )
      | ( sk3 != sk2 )
      | ( cD @ A )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[39,390]) ).

thf(417,plain,
    ( ( sk4 != sk3 )
    | ( sk3 != sk2 )
    | ( cD @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[416:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk2 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ( sk3 != sk2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( sk4 != sk3 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[37]) ).

thf(406,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ( cD @ A )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[10,390]) ).

thf(407,plain,
    ( ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( cD @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[406:[bind(A,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( sk4 != sk2 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[40]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(64,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 )
    | ( sk4 != sk3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ~ ( cD @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6]) ).

thf(465,plain,
    ( ( sk4 != sk3 )
    | ( sk3 != sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 )
    | ( ( cD @ sk2 )
     != ( cD @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[417,27]) ).

thf(466,plain,
    ( ( sk4 != sk3 )
    | ( sk3 != sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[465:[]]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ( ~ ( cD @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk2 ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk3 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ( ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk2 )
    | ( ( cD @ sk3 )
     != ( cD @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cE @ sk4 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ~ ( cD @ sk3 )
    | ( sk4 != sk2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
     != ( sk1 @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(414,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ~ ( cD @ sk3 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
      | ( cD @ A )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[12,390]) ).

thf(415,plain,
    ( ~ ( cD @ sk3 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk2 )
    | ( cD @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[414:[bind(A,$thf( sk4 ))]]) ).

thf(626,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[5,10,14,102,9,27,39,255,63,31,11,8,15,42,417,24,38,407,33,13,41,32,64,12,466,3,35,26,390,23,36,30,4,415]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09  % Problem  : SEV229^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.11  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.11/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % DateTime : Sun May 19 19:01:08 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.69/0.75  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.00/0.86  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (108ms). 
% 1.00/0.87  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.38/1.09  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.38/1.09  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.38/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.48/1.15  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.53/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.53/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.53/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.53/1.18  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 6.77/2.33  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 6.77/2.33  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 6.77/2.33  % Time passed: 1912ms (effective reasoning time: 1458ms)
% 6.77/2.33  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 6.77/2.34  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 6.77/2.34  % No. of inferences in proof: 57
% 6.77/2.34  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1912 ms resp. 1458 ms w/o parsing
% 6.81/2.38  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.81/2.38  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------