TSTP Solution File: SEV229^5 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SEV229^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:08:02 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   6 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  110 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   44 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  260 (  57   ~;  67   |;  15   &; 114   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   2   ^  16   !;   0   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_22,type,
    cE: a > $o ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    cD: a > $o ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    epred1_0: a > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    esk1_0: a ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    esk2_0: a ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    esk3_0: a ).

thf(cX5209_pme,conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X1: a > $o] :
        ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( X1 @ X2 )
         => ( ( cD @ X2 )
            & ( cE @ X2 ) ) ) )
    = ( ^ [X3: a > $o] :
          ( ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X3 @ X4 )
             => ( cD @ X4 ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X3 @ X4 )
             => ( cE @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cX5209_pme) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X5: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( X5 @ X2 )
           => ( ( cD @ X2 )
              & ( cE @ X2 ) ) )
      <=> ( ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X5 @ X4 )
             => ( cD @ X4 ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( X5 @ X4 )
             => ( cE @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cX5209_pme])])]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X10: a,X11: a,X12: a] :
      ( ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( cE @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ~ ( cD @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( cE @ esk3_0 )
        | ~ ( cD @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ~ ( cD @ esk1_0 )
        | ~ ( cE @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( cE @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ~ ( cD @ esk1_0 )
        | ~ ( cE @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ~ ( cD @ esk2_0 )
        | ~ ( cD @ esk1_0 )
        | ~ ( cE @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( cE @ esk3_0 )
        | ~ ( cD @ esk2_0 )
        | ~ ( cD @ esk1_0 )
        | ~ ( cE @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X11 )
        | ( cD @ X11 )
        | ( cD @ X10 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X10 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X12 )
        | ( cE @ X12 )
        | ( cD @ X10 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X10 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X11 )
        | ( cD @ X11 )
        | ( cE @ X10 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X10 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X12 )
        | ( cE @ X12 )
        | ( cE @ X10 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X10 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( cD @ X2 )
      | ( cD @ X4 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( cE @ X2 )
      | ( cE @ X4 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( cE @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( cD @ esk2_0 )
    | ~ ( cD @ esk1_0 )
    | ~ ( cE @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: a] :
      ( ( cD @ X2 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(condense,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ~ ( cE @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( cD @ esk1_0 )
    | ~ ( cE @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ~ ( cE @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: a] :
      ( ( cE @ X2 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(condense,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( cE @ esk1_0 )
    | ~ ( cE @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( cD @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ~ ( cE @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( cD @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( cE @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_6]),c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ~ ( cD @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( cE @ esk3_0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_6]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( cD @ esk2_0 )
    | ~ ( cD @ esk1_0 )
    | ~ ( cE @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ~ ( cD @ esk1_0 )
    | ~ ( cE @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_6]),c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( cE @ esk1_0 )
    | ~ ( cD @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_6]),c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0 @ esk1_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( cE @ esk1_0 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_6]),c_0_22])]),c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_9]),c_0_22])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SEV229^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 19:01:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting post_as_ho2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_13 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # new_ho_13 with pid 27641 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by new_ho_13
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting post_as_ho2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_13 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # new_ho_10 with pid 27644 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting post_as_ho2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_13 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 0.20/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 32
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 30
% 0.20/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 12
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 15
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.20/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 7
% 0.20/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 14
% 0.20/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of those cached                   : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.20/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 24
% 0.20/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21
% 0.20/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.20/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 18
% 0.20/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.20/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 32
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1101
% 0.20/0.49  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 245
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.20/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------