TSTP Solution File: SEV212^5 by Leo-III---1.7.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.12
% Problem  : SEV212^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:10:09 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 5.92s 3.26s
% Output   : Refutation 6.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   1 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   82 (  75 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   28 (  20 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  353 (   5   ~;  18   |;  78   &; 219   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  33  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   31 (  23 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   32 (  32   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   2 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  132 (   0   ^  78   !;  54   ?; 132   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(iS_type,type,
    iS: $tType ).

thf(cP_type,type,
    cP: iS > iS > iS ).

thf(c0_type,type,
    c0: iS ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A: iS,B: iS] :
          ( ( cP @ A @ B )
         != c0 )
      & ! [A: iS,B: iS,C: iS,D: iS] :
          ( ( ( cP @ A @ C )
            = ( cP @ B @ D ) )
         => ( ( A = B )
            & ( C = D ) ) )
      & ! [A: iS > $o] :
          ( ( ( A @ c0 )
            & ! [B: iS,C: iS] :
                ( ( ( A @ B )
                  & ( A @ C ) )
               => ( A @ ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) )
         => ! [B: iS] : ( A @ B ) ) )
   => ! [A: iS,B: iS,C: iS,D: iS] :
        ( ( ! [E: iS > iS > iS > $o] :
              ( ( $true
                & ! [F: iS,G: iS,H: iS] :
                    ( ( ( ( F = c0 )
                        & ( G = H ) )
                      | ( ( G = c0 )
                        & ( F = H ) )
                      | ? [I: iS,J: iS,K: iS,L: iS,M: iS,N: iS] :
                          ( ( F
                            = ( cP @ I @ J ) )
                          & ( G
                            = ( cP @ K @ L ) )
                          & ( H
                            = ( cP @ M @ N ) )
                          & ( E @ I @ K @ M )
                          & ( E @ J @ L @ N ) ) )
                   => ( E @ F @ G @ H ) ) )
             => ( E @ A @ B @ B ) )
          & ! [E: iS > iS > iS > $o] :
              ( ( $true
                & ! [F: iS,G: iS,H: iS] :
                    ( ( ( ( F = c0 )
                        & ( G = H ) )
                      | ( ( G = c0 )
                        & ( F = H ) )
                      | ? [I: iS,J: iS,K: iS,L: iS,M: iS,N: iS] :
                          ( ( F
                            = ( cP @ I @ J ) )
                          & ( G
                            = ( cP @ K @ L ) )
                          & ( H
                            = ( cP @ M @ N ) )
                          & ( E @ I @ K @ M )
                          & ( E @ J @ L @ N ) ) )
                   => ( E @ F @ G @ H ) ) )
             => ( E @ C @ D @ D ) ) )
       => ! [E: iS > iS > iS > $o] :
            ( ( $true
              & ! [F: iS,G: iS,H: iS] :
                  ( ( ( ( F = c0 )
                      & ( G = H ) )
                    | ( ( G = c0 )
                      & ( F = H ) )
                    | ? [I: iS,J: iS,K: iS,L: iS,M: iS,N: iS] :
                        ( ( F
                          = ( cP @ I @ J ) )
                        & ( G
                          = ( cP @ K @ L ) )
                        & ( H
                          = ( cP @ M @ N ) )
                        & ( E @ I @ K @ M )
                        & ( E @ J @ L @ N ) ) )
                 => ( E @ F @ G @ H ) ) )
           => ( E @ ( cP @ A @ C ) @ ( cP @ B @ D ) @ ( cP @ B @ D ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cS_LEM2_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: iS,B: iS] :
            ( ( cP @ A @ B )
           != c0 )
        & ! [A: iS,B: iS,C: iS,D: iS] :
            ( ( ( cP @ A @ C )
              = ( cP @ B @ D ) )
           => ( ( A = B )
              & ( C = D ) ) )
        & ! [A: iS > $o] :
            ( ( ( A @ c0 )
              & ! [B: iS,C: iS] :
                  ( ( ( A @ B )
                    & ( A @ C ) )
                 => ( A @ ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) )
           => ! [B: iS] : ( A @ B ) ) )
     => ! [A: iS,B: iS,C: iS,D: iS] :
          ( ( ! [E: iS > iS > iS > $o] :
                ( ( $true
                  & ! [F: iS,G: iS,H: iS] :
                      ( ( ( ( F = c0 )
                          & ( G = H ) )
                        | ( ( G = c0 )
                          & ( F = H ) )
                        | ? [I: iS,J: iS,K: iS,L: iS,M: iS,N: iS] :
                            ( ( F
                              = ( cP @ I @ J ) )
                            & ( G
                              = ( cP @ K @ L ) )
                            & ( H
                              = ( cP @ M @ N ) )
                            & ( E @ I @ K @ M )
                            & ( E @ J @ L @ N ) ) )
                     => ( E @ F @ G @ H ) ) )
               => ( E @ A @ B @ B ) )
            & ! [E: iS > iS > iS > $o] :
                ( ( $true
                  & ! [F: iS,G: iS,H: iS] :
                      ( ( ( ( F = c0 )
                          & ( G = H ) )
                        | ( ( G = c0 )
                          & ( F = H ) )
                        | ? [I: iS,J: iS,K: iS,L: iS,M: iS,N: iS] :
                            ( ( F
                              = ( cP @ I @ J ) )
                            & ( G
                              = ( cP @ K @ L ) )
                            & ( H
                              = ( cP @ M @ N ) )
                            & ( E @ I @ K @ M )
                            & ( E @ J @ L @ N ) ) )
                     => ( E @ F @ G @ H ) ) )
               => ( E @ C @ D @ D ) ) )
         => ! [E: iS > iS > iS > $o] :
              ( ( $true
                & ! [F: iS,G: iS,H: iS] :
                    ( ( ( ( F = c0 )
                        & ( G = H ) )
                      | ( ( G = c0 )
                        & ( F = H ) )
                      | ? [I: iS,J: iS,K: iS,L: iS,M: iS,N: iS] :
                          ( ( F
                            = ( cP @ I @ J ) )
                          & ( G
                            = ( cP @ K @ L ) )
                          & ( H
                            = ( cP @ M @ N ) )
                          & ( E @ I @ K @ M )
                          & ( E @ J @ L @ N ) ) )
                   => ( E @ F @ G @ H ) ) )
             => ( E @ ( cP @ A @ C ) @ ( cP @ B @ D ) @ ( cP @ B @ D ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: iS,B: iS] :
            ( ( cP @ A @ B )
           != c0 )
        & ! [A: iS,B: iS,C: iS,D: iS] :
            ( ( ( cP @ A @ C )
              = ( cP @ B @ D ) )
           => ( ( A = B )
              & ( C = D ) ) )
        & ! [A: iS > $o] :
            ( ( ( A @ c0 )
              & ! [B: iS,C: iS] :
                  ( ( ( A @ B )
                    & ( A @ C ) )
                 => ( A @ ( cP @ B @ C ) ) ) )
           => ! [B: iS] : ( A @ B ) ) )
     => ! [A: iS,B: iS,C: iS,D: iS] :
          ( ( ! [E: iS > iS > iS > $o] :
                ( ! [F: iS,G: iS,H: iS] :
                    ( ( ( ( F = c0 )
                        & ( G = H ) )
                      | ( ( G = c0 )
                        & ( F = H ) )
                      | ? [I: iS,J: iS,K: iS,L: iS,M: iS,N: iS] :
                          ( ( F
                            = ( cP @ I @ J ) )
                          & ( G
                            = ( cP @ K @ L ) )
                          & ( H
                            = ( cP @ M @ N ) )
                          & ( E @ I @ K @ M )
                          & ( E @ J @ L @ N ) ) )
                   => ( E @ F @ G @ H ) )
               => ( E @ A @ B @ B ) )
            & ! [E: iS > iS > iS > $o] :
                ( ! [F: iS,G: iS,H: iS] :
                    ( ( ( ( F = c0 )
                        & ( G = H ) )
                      | ( ( G = c0 )
                        & ( F = H ) )
                      | ? [I: iS,J: iS,K: iS,L: iS,M: iS,N: iS] :
                          ( ( F
                            = ( cP @ I @ J ) )
                          & ( G
                            = ( cP @ K @ L ) )
                          & ( H
                            = ( cP @ M @ N ) )
                          & ( E @ I @ K @ M )
                          & ( E @ J @ L @ N ) ) )
                   => ( E @ F @ G @ H ) )
               => ( E @ C @ D @ D ) ) )
         => ! [E: iS > iS > iS > $o] :
              ( ! [F: iS,G: iS,H: iS] :
                  ( ( ( ( F = c0 )
                      & ( G = H ) )
                    | ( ( G = c0 )
                      & ( F = H ) )
                    | ? [I: iS,J: iS,K: iS,L: iS,M: iS,N: iS] :
                        ( ( F
                          = ( cP @ I @ J ) )
                        & ( G
                          = ( cP @ K @ L ) )
                        & ( H
                          = ( cP @ M @ N ) )
                        & ( E @ I @ K @ M )
                        & ( E @ J @ L @ N ) ) )
                 => ( E @ F @ G @ H ) )
             => ( E @ ( cP @ A @ C ) @ ( cP @ B @ D ) @ ( cP @ B @ D ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(100,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cvc4,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEV212^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Sun May 19 18:40:54 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.16/1.15  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.65/1.36  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (200ms). 
% 1.65/1.37  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.44/1.82  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.48/1.82  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 2.48/1.83  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.91/1.99  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.91/2.06  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.91/2.06  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.91/2.07  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.11/2.08  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.92/3.25  % External prover 'cvc4' found a proof!
% 5.92/3.26  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.92/3.26  % Time passed: 2713ms (effective reasoning time: 1879ms)
% 5.92/3.26  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.92/3.26  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 5.92/3.26  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 5.92/3.26  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2713 ms resp. 1879 ms w/o parsing
% 6.09/3.31  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.09/3.31  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------