TSTP Solution File: SEV188^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEV188^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:12:18 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SEV188^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 18:29:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.35  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36  % (15955)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (15955)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37  % (15952)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (15948)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (15950)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (15951)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (15948)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37  % (15955)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  tff(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 0.14/0.37  tff(type_def_6, type, b: $tType).
% 0.14/0.37  tff(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 0.14/0.37  tff(func_def_1, type, b: $tType).
% 0.14/0.37  fof(f7,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    $false),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.14/0.37  fof(f6,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    $false),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(true_and_false_elimination,[],[f5])).
% 0.14/0.37  fof(f5,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ~! [X0 : sTfun(sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o)),$o)] : (! [X1 : sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o))] : ((vAPP(sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o)),$o,X0,X1) = $true) => $true) => $true)),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.14/0.37  fof(f4,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ~! [X0 : sTfun(sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o)),$o)] : (! [X1 : sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o))] : (vAPP(sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o)),$o,X0,X1) => $true) => $true)),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.14/0.37  fof(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37    ~! [X0 : sTfun(sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o)),$o)] : (! [X1 : sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o))] : (vAPP(sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o)),$o,X0,X1) => $true) => $true)),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.14/0.37  fof(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37    ! [X0 : sTfun(sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o)),$o)] : (! [X1 : sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o))] : (vAPP(sTfun(a,sTfun(b,$o)),$o,X0,X1) => $true) => $true)),
% 0.14/0.37    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cCS2_ALL_THM_pme)).
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  % (15955)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (15955)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (15955)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (15955)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.14/0.37  % (15955)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (15955)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (15955)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (15955)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (15947)Success in time 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.37  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------