TSTP Solution File: SEV081^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEV081^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:11:55 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 2 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 122 ( 43 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 8 avg)
% Number of connectives : 205 ( 29 ~; 14 |; 24 &; 132 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 134 ( 134 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 78 ( 14 ^ 35 !; 28 ?; 78 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_3,type,
sK0: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
sK1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
sK2: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
sK3: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_9,type,
ph5:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(f26,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f25]) ).
thf(f25,plain,
$true != $true,
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f24]) ).
thf(f24,plain,
( ( $true != $true )
| ( $true != $true )
| ( $true != $true ) ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f18]) ).
thf(f18,plain,
! [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
( ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : $true
@ ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : $true )
@ ( sK1
@ ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : $true ) )
!= $true )
| ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : $true
@ ( sK3
@ ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : $true )
@ ( sK3
@ ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : $true ) )
!= $true )
| ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : $true
@ X1
@ X2 )
!= $true ) ),
inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
! [X2: $i > $o,X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o,X1: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ ( sK3 @ X0 ) @ ( sK3 @ X0 ) )
!= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
!= $true ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ( ( ( X0 @ ( sK2 @ X0 ) @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
= $true )
& ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( sK2 @ X0 ) )
= $true )
& ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
!= $true ) )
| ( ( X0 @ ( sK3 @ X0 ) @ ( sK3 @ X0 ) )
!= $true ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f8,f10,f9]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ? [X3: $i > $o,X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ X5 @ X4 )
= $true )
& ( ( X0 @ X3 @ X5 )
= $true )
& ( ( X0 @ X3 @ X4 )
!= $true ) )
=> ( ( ( X0 @ ( sK2 @ X0 ) @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
= $true )
& ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( sK2 @ X0 ) )
= $true )
& ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) )
!= $true ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f10,plain,
! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ? [X6: $i > $o] :
( $true
!= ( X0 @ X6 @ X6 ) )
=> ( ( X0 @ ( sK3 @ X0 ) @ ( sK3 @ X0 ) )
!= $true ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ? [X3: $i > $o,X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ X5 @ X4 )
= $true )
& ( ( X0 @ X3 @ X5 )
= $true )
& ( ( X0 @ X3 @ X4 )
!= $true ) )
| ? [X6: $i > $o] :
( $true
!= ( X0 @ X6 @ X6 ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ? [X6: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o,X4: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ X4 @ X5 )
= $true )
& ( $true
= ( X0 @ X6 @ X4 ) )
& ( ( X0 @ X6 @ X5 )
!= $true ) )
| ? [X3: $i > $o] :
( ( X0 @ X3 @ X3 )
!= $true ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ? [X3: $i > $o] :
( ( X0 @ X3 @ X3 )
!= $true )
| ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ? [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ X6 @ X5 )
!= $true )
& ( $true
= ( X0 @ X6 @ X4 ) )
& ( ( X0 @ X4 @ X5 )
= $true ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
thf(f5,plain,
~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ! [X3: $i > $o] :
( ( X0 @ X3 @ X3 )
= $true )
& ? [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
= $true )
& ! [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] :
( ( ( $true
= ( X0 @ X6 @ X4 ) )
& ( ( X0 @ X4 @ X5 )
= $true ) )
=> ( ( X0 @ X6 @ X5 )
= $true ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,plain,
~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ? [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
& ! [X3: $i > $o] : ( X0 @ X3 @ X3 )
& ! [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ X4 @ X5 )
& ( X0 @ X6 @ X4 ) )
=> ( X0 @ X6 @ X5 ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ? [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
& ! [X3: $i > $o] : ( X0 @ X3 @ X3 )
& ! [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ X4 @ X5 )
& ( X0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
=> ( X0 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,conjecture,
? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ? [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
& ! [X3: $i > $o] : ( X0 @ X3 @ X3 )
& ! [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X0 @ X4 @ X5 )
& ( X0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
=> ( X0 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM120_1_pme) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.13 % Problem : SEV081^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 18:38:07 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.37 % (8842)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8838)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8836)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8839)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8837)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8841)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8840)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8835)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8838)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.37 % (8838)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (8838)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8838)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.37 % (8838)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.37 % (8839)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.37 % (8839)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (8839)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 % (8838)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37 % (8838)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.37 % (8838)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8838)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (8838)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (8839)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.37 % (8839)Termination phase: Preprocessing 3
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 % (8839)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.14/0.37 % (8839)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.37 % (8839)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8839)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (8839)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (8842)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.37 % (8842)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (8842)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8842)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.37 % (8842)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 % (8842)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37 % (8842)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.37 % (8842)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.37 % (8842)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (8842)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (8837)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38 % (8837)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (8837)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (8837)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (8837)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (8837)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (8837)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (8836)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.38 % (8837)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (8837)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (8841)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.38 % (8840)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.38 % (8836)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.38 % (8836)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (8836)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (8836)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (8836)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (8836)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (8836)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (8836)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (8836)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (8834)Success in time 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------