TSTP Solution File: SEV081^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SEV081^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:07:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 1 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 89 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 8 &; 60 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 9 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 56 ( 56 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 ^ 14 !; 6 ?; 20 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
epred1_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_23,type,
epred2_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
epred3_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
epred4_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(cTHM120_1_pme,conjecture,
? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ? [X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] : ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
& ! [X4: $i > $o] : ( X1 @ X4 @ X4 )
& ! [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X4 @ X5 )
& ( X1 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X1 @ X4 @ X6 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM120_1_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ? [X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] : ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
& ! [X4: $i > $o] : ( X1 @ X4 @ X4 )
& ! [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X4 @ X5 )
& ( X1 @ X5 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X1 @ X4 @ X6 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120_1_pme]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X14: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o,X15: $i > $o,X16: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X14 @ ( epred2_1 @ X14 ) @ ( epred3_1 @ X14 ) )
| ~ ( X14 @ X15 @ X16 )
| ~ ( X14 @ ( epred1_1 @ X14 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X14 ) ) )
& ( ( X14 @ ( epred3_1 @ X14 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X14 ) )
| ~ ( X14 @ X15 @ X16 )
| ~ ( X14 @ ( epred1_1 @ X14 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X14 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( X14 @ ( epred2_1 @ X14 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X14 ) )
| ~ ( X14 @ X15 @ X16 )
| ~ ( X14 @ ( epred1_1 @ X14 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o,X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ~ ( X1 @ ( epred2_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred4_1 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SEV081^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 18:37:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # full_lambda_6 with pid 12338 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by full_lambda_6
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: HHHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # new_ho_10 with pid 12344 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: HHHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 369
% 0.20/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 127
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1816 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------