TSTP Solution File: SEV049^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SEV049^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:07:28 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 1 unt; 3 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 62 ( 10 ~; 4 |; 6 &; 40 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 40 ( 40 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 12 ^ 8 !; 2 ?; 22 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
epred1_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_23,type,
epred2_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_24,type,
epred3_1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(cTHM120A_pme,conjecture,
? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ~ ( X1
@ ^ [X2: $i] : $true
@ ^ [X2: $i] : ~ $true )
& ! [X3: $i > $o,X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
& ( X1 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
=> ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM120A_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ~ ( X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : $true
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true )
& ! [X3: $i > $o,X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
& ( X1 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
=> ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120A_pme])]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X10: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( ( X10 @ ( epred1_1 @ X10 ) @ ( epred2_1 @ X10 ) )
| ( X10
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : $true
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true ) )
& ( ( X10 @ ( epred2_1 @ X10 ) @ ( epred3_1 @ X10 ) )
| ( X10
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : $true
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true ) )
& ( ~ ( X10 @ ( epred1_1 @ X10 ) @ ( epred3_1 @ X10 ) )
| ( X10
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : $true
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
( ( X1 @ ( epred1_1 @ X1 ) @ ( epred2_1 @ X1 ) )
| ( X1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : $true
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ~ $true ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : SEV049^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 18:28:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 19726 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by ehoh_best8_lambda
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 163s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # ehoh_best6_lambda with pid 19729 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by ehoh_best6_lambda
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 163s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.22/0.52 # Processed clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.22/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 4
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 321
% 0.22/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 93
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.22/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------