TSTP Solution File: SEV014^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEV014^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:11:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 4 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 128 ( 54 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 9 avg)
% Number of connectives : 241 ( 31 ~; 18 |; 30 &; 148 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 14 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 20 ( 20 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 80 ( 0 ^ 69 !; 10 ?; 80 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
vEPSILON:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
sK0: a > a > $o ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
sK1: a ).
thf(f17,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f16]) ).
thf(f16,plain,
$true != $true,
inference(superposition,[],[f14,f13]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
! [X4: a] :
( ( sK0 @ X4 @ X4 )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
( ! [X1: a,X2: a] :
( ( ( sK0 @ X1 @ X2 )
= $true )
| ( ( sK0 @ X2 @ X1 )
!= $true ) )
& ( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ sK1 )
!= $true )
& ! [X4: a] :
( ( sK0 @ X4 @ X4 )
= $true )
& ! [X5: a,X6: a,X7: a] :
( ( ( sK0 @ X5 @ X6 )
= $true )
| ( $true
!= ( sK0 @ X7 @ X6 ) )
| ( $true
!= ( sK0 @ X5 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f8,f10,f9]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
( ? [X0: a > a > $o] :
( ! [X1: a,X2: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 )
!= $true ) )
& ? [X3: a] :
( $true
!= ( X0 @ X3 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X4: a] :
( $true
= ( X0 @ X4 @ X4 ) )
& ! [X5: a,X6: a,X7: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X5 @ X6 )
= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ X7 @ X6 )
!= $true )
| ( $true
!= ( X0 @ X5 @ X7 ) ) ) )
=> ( ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
( ( ( sK0 @ X1 @ X2 )
= $true )
| ( ( sK0 @ X2 @ X1 )
!= $true ) )
& ? [X3: a] :
( ( sK0 @ X3 @ X3 )
!= $true )
& ! [X4: a] :
( ( sK0 @ X4 @ X4 )
= $true )
& ! [X7: a,X6: a,X5: a] :
( ( ( sK0 @ X5 @ X6 )
= $true )
| ( $true
!= ( sK0 @ X7 @ X6 ) )
| ( $true
!= ( sK0 @ X5 @ X7 ) ) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f10,plain,
( ? [X3: a] :
( ( sK0 @ X3 @ X3 )
!= $true )
=> ( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ sK1 )
!= $true ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
? [X0: a > a > $o] :
( ! [X1: a,X2: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 )
!= $true ) )
& ? [X3: a] :
( $true
!= ( X0 @ X3 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X4: a] :
( $true
= ( X0 @ X4 @ X4 ) )
& ! [X5: a,X6: a,X7: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X5 @ X6 )
= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ X7 @ X6 )
!= $true )
| ( $true
!= ( X0 @ X5 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
? [X0: a > a > $o] :
( ! [X6: a,X5: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X6 @ X5 )
= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ X5 @ X6 )
!= $true ) )
& ? [X7: a] :
( ( X0 @ X7 @ X7 )
!= $true )
& ! [X4: a] :
( $true
= ( X0 @ X4 @ X4 ) )
& ! [X1: a,X3: a,X2: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 )
= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
!= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
!= $true ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
? [X0: a > a > $o] :
( ? [X7: a] :
( ( X0 @ X7 @ X7 )
!= $true )
& ! [X6: a,X5: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X6 @ X5 )
= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ X5 @ X6 )
!= $true ) )
& ! [X3: a,X2: a,X1: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 )
= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
!= $true )
| ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
!= $true ) )
& ! [X4: a] :
( $true
= ( X0 @ X4 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
thf(f5,plain,
~ ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X6: a,X5: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X5 @ X6 )
= $true )
=> ( ( X0 @ X6 @ X5 )
= $true ) )
& ! [X3: a,X2: a,X1: a] :
( ( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
= $true )
& ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
= $true ) )
=> ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 )
= $true ) )
& ! [X4: a] :
( $true
= ( X0 @ X4 @ X4 ) ) )
=> ! [X7: a] :
( ( X0 @ X7 @ X7 )
= $true ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,plain,
~ ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
& ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 ) )
=> ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X4: a] : ( X0 @ X4 @ X4 )
& ! [X5: a,X6: a] :
( ( X0 @ X5 @ X6 )
=> ( X0 @ X6 @ X5 ) ) )
=> ! [X7: a] : ( X0 @ X7 @ X7 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
& ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 ) )
=> ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X1: a] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X1 )
& ! [X1: a,X2: a] :
( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
=> ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) ) )
=> ! [X1: a] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X1 ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,conjecture,
! [X0: a > a > $o] :
( ( ! [X1: a,X2: a,X3: a] :
( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
& ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 ) )
=> ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X1: a] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X1 )
& ! [X1: a,X2: a] :
( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
=> ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) ) )
=> ! [X1: a] : ( X0 @ X1 @ X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM513_pme) ).
thf(f14,plain,
( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ sK1 )
!= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SEV014^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.15/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 19:18:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.38 % (28642)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (28643)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (28644)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (28647)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (28646)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (28648)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (28649)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (28645)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (28645)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.38 % (28645)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (28645)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.38 % (28645)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.38 % (28645)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.38 % (28646)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.38 % (28646)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (28646)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (28645)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.22/0.38 % (28645)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (28645)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (28645)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (28645)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (28644)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.38 % (28646)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.38 % (28646)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (28646)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.38 % (28646)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (28646)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (28646)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (28646)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (28648)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.39 % (28644)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.39 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.39 % (28644)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (28644)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39 % (28644)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (28644)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.39 % (28644)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (28644)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (28644)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (28644)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (28641)Success in time 0.017 s
% 0.22/0.39 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------