TSTP Solution File: SEV000^5 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SEV000^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:07:11 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.42s 0.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (  32 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   82 (  81 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  592 (  13   ~;  11   |;  24   &; 538   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   35 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  146 (   0   ^ 146   !;   0   ?; 146   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_22,type,
    esk1_0: a > a > a ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    esk2_0: a > a > a ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    esk3_0: a ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    esk4_0: a ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    esk5_0: a ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    esk6_0: a ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    esk7_0: a ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    esk8_0: a ).

thf(cMODULAR_EQUIV_THM_pme,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a > a > a,X2: a > a > a] :
      ( ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X3 )
            = X3 )
        & ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X3 )
            = X3 )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
            = ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X1 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
            ( ( X2 @ ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
            = ( X2 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
            = ( X1 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
            = ( X2 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
            = X4 )
        & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
            ( ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
            = X4 ) )
     => ( ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 )
              = X5 )
           => ( ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
              = ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 ) ) )
      <=> ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) )
            = ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cMODULAR_EQUIV_THM_pme) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > a > a,X2: a > a > a] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X3 )
              = X3 )
          & ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X3 )
              = X3 )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
              = ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X1 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
              = ( X2 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 )
              = ( X1 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
              = ( X2 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ ( X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
              = X4 )
          & ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
              ( ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
              = X4 ) )
       => ( ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 )
                = X5 )
             => ( ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
                = ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 ) ) )
        <=> ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X4 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) )
              = ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cMODULAR_EQUIV_THM_pme]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X32: a,X33: a,X34: a,X35: a,X36: a,X37: a,X38: a,X39: a,X40: a,X41: a,X42: a,X43: a,X44: a,X45: a,X46: a,X47: a,X54: a,X55: a,X56: a,X57: a,X58: a,X59: a] :
      ( ( ( esk1_0 @ X32 @ X32 )
        = X32 )
      & ( ( esk2_0 @ X33 @ X33 )
        = X33 )
      & ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X34 @ X35 ) @ X36 )
        = ( esk1_0 @ X34 @ ( esk1_0 @ X35 @ X36 ) ) )
      & ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X37 @ X38 ) @ X39 )
        = ( esk2_0 @ X37 @ ( esk2_0 @ X38 @ X39 ) ) )
      & ( ( esk1_0 @ X40 @ X41 )
        = ( esk1_0 @ X41 @ X40 ) )
      & ( ( esk2_0 @ X42 @ X43 )
        = ( esk2_0 @ X43 @ X42 ) )
      & ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X44 @ X45 ) @ X45 )
        = X45 )
      & ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X46 @ X47 ) @ X47 )
        = X47 )
      & ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0 )
          = esk5_0 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk7_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) ) )
         != ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) ) ) )
      & ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
         != ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) @ esk5_0 ) )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk7_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) ) )
         != ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) ) ) )
      & ( ( ( esk1_0 @ X54 @ X56 )
         != X56 )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X54 @ ( esk2_0 @ X55 @ X56 ) )
          = ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X54 @ X55 ) @ X56 ) )
        | ( ( esk1_0 @ X57 @ ( esk2_0 @ X58 @ ( esk1_0 @ X57 @ X59 ) ) )
          = ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X57 @ X58 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ X57 @ X59 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
      = ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X3 )
      = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
      = X4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
      = ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X4 )
      = X4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X8: a,X10: a,X9: a,X5: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ X4 ) )
        = ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5 ) @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X8 @ ( esk2_0 @ X9 @ ( esk1_0 @ X8 @ X10 ) ) )
        = ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X8 @ X9 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ X8 @ X10 ) ) )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 )
       != X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      = ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
      = X3 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) )
      = X3 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0 )
      = esk5_0 )
    | ( ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk7_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) ) )
     != ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a,X8: a,X9: a,X10: a] :
      ( ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5 ) )
        = ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ) )
      | ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X8 @ X9 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ X8 @ X10 ) )
        = ( esk1_0 @ X8 @ ( esk2_0 @ X9 @ ( esk1_0 @ X8 @ X10 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ X5 )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      = X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: a,X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X4 @ ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ X3 ) ) )
      = X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk3_0 )
      = esk5_0 )
    | ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) )
     != ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk7_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5 ) )
      = ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X5: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) @ X5 ) )
      = ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X5: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X5 ) ) )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a,X5: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_8]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X5: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ X3 ) ) )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk3_0 )
    = esk5_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: a,X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X5 ) )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X5: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ X3 ) @ X4 ) )
      = ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X5 @ X3 ) @ X4 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_21]),c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X5: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X5 ) ) )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ esk3_0 ) )
      = ( esk2_0 @ esk3_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
     != ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) @ esk5_0 ) )
    | ( ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk7_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) ) )
     != ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a,X5: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk2_0 @ X4 @ ( esk1_0 @ X5 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ esk5_0 ) ) )
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ esk5_0 ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_25]),c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ esk5_0 ) @ ( esk2_0 @ esk3_0 @ X3 ) )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      = X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk2_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) )
     != ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk7_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0 ) ) ) )
    | ( ( esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
     != ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk4_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ esk5_0 ) ) )
      = ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ X3 ) ) )
      = ( esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_8]),c_0_6]),c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
   != ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_19])]) ).

thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( esk2_0 @ esk5_0 @ ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ X3 ) )
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ esk5_0 ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_36]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_37]),c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_8])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SEV000^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 18:44:52 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.42/0.70  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 1.42/0.70  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 1.42/0.70  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting post_as_ho1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting new_ho_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 3836 completed with status 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
% 1.42/0.70  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 1.42/0.70  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting post_as_ho1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting new_ho_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.42/0.70  # Search class: HGHPM-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
% 1.42/0.70  # partial match(3): HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 1.42/0.70  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting sh3 with 163s (1) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # sh3 with pid 3841 completed with status 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Result found by sh3
% 1.42/0.70  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 1.42/0.70  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting post_as_ho1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting new_ho_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.42/0.70  # Search class: HGHPM-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
% 1.42/0.70  # partial match(3): HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 1.42/0.70  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.42/0.70  # Starting sh3 with 163s (1) cores
% 1.42/0.70  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 1.42/0.70  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.42/0.70  
% 1.42/0.70  # Proof found!
% 1.42/0.70  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.42/0.70  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.42/0.70  # Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 1.42/0.70  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Initial clauses                      : 12
% 1.42/0.70  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 1.42/0.70  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 1.42/0.70  # Processed clauses                    : 1597
% 1.42/0.70  # ...of these trivial                  : 500
% 1.42/0.70  # ...subsumed                          : 918
% 1.42/0.70  # ...remaining for further processing  : 179
% 1.42/0.70  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 1.42/0.70  # Backward-rewritten                   : 22
% 1.42/0.70  # Generated clauses                    : 21265
% 1.42/0.70  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12689
% 1.42/0.70  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Paramodulations                      : 21261
% 1.42/0.70  # Factorizations                       : 4
% 1.42/0.70  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Total rewrite steps                  : 29222
% 1.42/0.70  # ...of those cached                   : 21148
% 1.42/0.70  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.42/0.70  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.42/0.70  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.42/0.70  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.42/0.70  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.42/0.70  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.42/0.70  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.42/0.70  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.42/0.70  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.42/0.70  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.42/0.70  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.42/0.70  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.42/0.70  # Current number of processed clauses  : 143
% 1.42/0.70  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 135
% 1.42/0.70  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 1.42/0.70  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 1.42/0.70  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11111
% 1.42/0.70  # ...number of literals in the above   : 12603
% 1.42/0.70  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Current number of archived clauses   : 36
% 1.42/0.70  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 48
% 1.42/0.70  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 47
% 1.42/0.70  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 1.42/0.70  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 354
% 1.42/0.70  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 523
% 1.42/0.70  # BW rewrite match successes           : 166
% 1.42/0.70  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.42/0.70  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 232559
% 1.42/0.70  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 525
% 1.42/0.70  
% 1.42/0.70  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.42/0.70  # User time                : 0.206 s
% 1.42/0.70  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 1.42/0.70  # Total time               : 0.215 s
% 1.42/0.70  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 1.42/0.70  
% 1.42/0.70  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.42/0.70  # User time                : 0.206 s
% 1.42/0.70  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 1.42/0.70  # Total time               : 0.219 s
% 1.42/0.70  # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 1.42/0.70  % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.42/0.70  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------