TSTP Solution File: SEU995^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SEU995^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:31:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 5 unt; 2 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 10 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 34 ( 8 ~; 0 |; 1 &; 23 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 36 ( 36 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 4 ( 2 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 ^ 15 !; 2 ?; 17 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
cV: $i ).
thf(decl_23,type,
cU: $i ).
thf(cTHM24_pme,conjecture,
( ( cU != cV )
=> ? [X1: ( $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
~ ! [X2: $i > $i,X3: $i > $i] :
( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
= ( X1 @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM24_pme) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( cU != cV )
=> ? [X1: ( $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
~ ! [X2: $i > $i,X3: $i > $i] :
( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
= ( X1 @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM24_pme])]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: ( $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X8: $i > $i,X9: $i > $i] :
( ( cU != cV )
& ( ( X7 @ X8 @ X9 )
= ( X7 @ X9 @ X8 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X3: $i > $i,X2: $i > $i] :
( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
= ( X1 @ X3 @ X2 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
cU != cV,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: ( $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X2: $i > $i,X3: $i > $i,X10: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X10 )
= ( X1 @ X3 @ X2 @ X10 ) ),
inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i > $i] :
( ( X2 @ cV )
!= cU ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU995^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 16:19:07 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.43 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.45 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.20/0.45 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.20/0.45 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # sh2lt with pid 2680 completed with status 8
% 0.20/0.45 # new_ho_10_unif with pid 2681 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Result found by new_ho_10_unif
% 0.20/0.45 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.20/0.45 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.45 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-SHHFFMNN
% 0.20/0.45 # partial match(2): HUHPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.20/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # new_ho_10 with pid 2690 completed with status 9
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # new_ho_10_unif with pid 2695 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Result found by new_ho_10_unif
% 0.20/0.45 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
% 0.20/0.45 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting sh2lt with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.45 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-SHHFFMNN
% 0.20/0.45 # partial match(2): HUHPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFNN
% 0.20/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # new_ho_10 with pid 2690 completed with status 9
% 0.20/0.45 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.20/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.20/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.20/0.45 # Processed clauses : 12
% 0.20/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.20/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.20/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.20/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Generated clauses : 144
% 0.20/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 95
% 0.20/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Paramodulations : 140
% 0.20/0.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.20/0.45 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.20/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.20/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 87
% 0.20/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 87
% 0.20/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.20/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 36
% 0.20/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.20/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 12
% 0.20/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3841
% 0.20/0.45 # Search garbage collected termcells : 47
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.45 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.45 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.45 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1608 pages
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.45 # User time : 0.022 s
% 0.20/0.45 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.45 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.20/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.20/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------