TSTP Solution File: SEU967^5 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEU967^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:44:25 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.28s 4.49s
% Output   : Proof 4.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU967^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Wed Aug 23 19:38:23 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.28/4.49  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.28/4.49  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 4.28/4.49  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 4.28/4.49    (Not
% 4.28/4.49      (Not
% 4.28/4.49        (∀ (Xm_5 : (Iota → Iota) → Iota → Prop),
% 4.28/4.49          And
% 4.28/4.49            (And (Exists fun Xw_2 => Xm_5 (cG_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists fun Xw_20 => Xm_5 Xw_1144 Xw_20) Xw_2)
% 4.28/4.49              (Exists fun Xw_2 => Xm_5 (cH_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists fun Xw_20 => Xm_5 Xw_1144 Xw_20) Xw_2))
% 4.28/4.49            (Or
% 4.28/4.49              (Not
% 4.28/4.49                (Exists fun Xw_2 =>
% 4.28/4.49                  Xm_5
% 4.28/4.49                    (fun Xx =>
% 4.28/4.49                      cG_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists fun Xw_20 => Xm_5 Xw_1144 Xw_20)
% 4.28/4.49                        (cH_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists fun Xw_20 => Xm_5 Xw_1144 Xw_20) Xx))
% 4.28/4.49                    Xw_2))
% 4.28/4.49              (And (cP_0 (cY_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists fun Xw_2 => Xm_5 Xw_1144 Xw_2))
% 4.28/4.49                (Not
% 4.28/4.49                  (cP_0
% 4.28/4.49                    (cG_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists fun Xw_2 => Xm_5 Xw_1144 Xw_2)
% 4.28/4.49                      (cY_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists fun Xw_2 => Xm_5 Xw_1144 Xw_2)))))))))
% 4.28/4.49    True
% 4.28/4.49  Clause #1 (by betaEtaReduce #[0]): Eq
% 4.28/4.49    (Not
% 4.28/4.49      (Not
% 4.28/4.49        (∀ (Xm_5 : (Iota → Iota) → Iota → Prop),
% 4.28/4.49          And
% 4.28/4.49            (And (Exists (Xm_5 (cG_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144))))
% 4.28/4.49              (Exists (Xm_5 (cH_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)))))
% 4.28/4.49            (Or
% 4.28/4.49              (Not
% 4.28/4.49                (Exists
% 4.28/4.49                  (Xm_5 fun Xx =>
% 4.28/4.49                    cG_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)) (cH_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)) Xx))))
% 4.28/4.49              (And (cP_0 (cY_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)))
% 4.28/4.49                (Not
% 4.28/4.49                  (cP_0 (cG_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)) (cY_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144))))))))))
% 4.28/4.49    True
% 4.28/4.49  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq
% 4.28/4.49    (Not
% 4.28/4.49      (∀ (Xm_5 : (Iota → Iota) → Iota → Prop),
% 4.28/4.49        And
% 4.28/4.49          (And (Exists (Xm_5 (cG_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144))))
% 4.28/4.49            (Exists (Xm_5 (cH_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)))))
% 4.28/4.49          (Or
% 4.28/4.49            (Not
% 4.28/4.49              (Exists
% 4.28/4.49                (Xm_5 fun Xx =>
% 4.28/4.49                  cG_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)) (cH_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)) Xx))))
% 4.28/4.49            (And (cP_0 (cY_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)))
% 4.28/4.49              (Not (cP_0 (cG_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)) (cY_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)))))))))
% 4.28/4.49    False
% 4.28/4.49  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): Eq
% 4.28/4.49    (∀ (Xm_5 : (Iota → Iota) → Iota → Prop),
% 4.28/4.49      And
% 4.28/4.49        (And (Exists (Xm_5 (cG_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144))))
% 4.28/4.49          (Exists (Xm_5 (cH_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)))))
% 4.28/4.49        (Or
% 4.28/4.49          (Not
% 4.28/4.49            (Exists
% 4.28/4.49              (Xm_5 fun Xx =>
% 4.28/4.49                cG_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)) (cH_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)) Xx))))
% 4.28/4.49          (And (cP_0 (cY_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)))
% 4.28/4.49            (Not (cP_0 (cG_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144)) (cY_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (Xm_5 Xw_1144))))))))
% 4.28/4.49    True
% 4.28/4.49  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Iota → Prop),
% 4.28/4.49    Eq
% 4.28/4.49      (And
% 4.28/4.49        (And (Exists (a (cG_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (a Xw_1144)))) (Exists (a (cH_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (a Xw_1144)))))
% 4.28/4.49        (Or
% 4.28/4.49          (Not
% 4.28/4.49            (Exists (a fun Xx => cG_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (a Xw_1144)) (cH_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (a Xw_1144)) Xx))))
% 4.28/4.49          (And (cP_0 (cY_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (a Xw_1144)))
% 4.28/4.49            (Not (cP_0 (cG_0 (fun Xw_1144 => Exists (a Xw_1144)) (cY_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (a Xw_1144))))))))
% 4.28/4.49      True
% 4.28/4.49  Clause #6 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Iota → Prop),
% 4.28/4.49    Eq (And (Exists (a (cG_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (a Xw_1144)))) (Exists (a (cH_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (a Xw_1144)))))
% 4.28/4.49      True
% 4.28/4.49  Clause #21 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Iota → Prop), Eq (Exists (a (cG_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (a Xw_1144)))) True
% 4.28/4.49  Clause #36 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a : (Iota → Iota) → Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Eq (a (cG_0 fun Xw_1144 => Exists (a Xw_1144)) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) True
% 4.28/4.49  Clause #52 (by fluidBoolHoist #[36]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota),
% 4.28/4.49    Or (Eq ((fun Xw_1144 x => a x) (cG_0 fun Xw_1144 => False) (skS.0 1 (fun Xw_1144 x => a x) a_1)) True)
% 4.28/4.50      (Eq (Exists a) True)
% 4.28/4.50  Clause #125 (by betaEtaReduce #[52]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (a (skS.0 1 (fun Xw_1144 x => a x) a_1)) True) (Eq (Exists a) True)
% 4.28/4.50  Clause #126 (by clausification #[125]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 4.28/4.50    Or (Eq (a (skS.0 1 (fun Xw_1144 x => a x) a_1)) True) (Eq (a (skS.0 2 a a_2)) True)
% 4.28/4.50  Clause #129 (by equality factoring #[126]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Or (Ne True True) (Eq ((fun x => a) (skS.0 2 (fun x => a) a_1)) True)
% 4.28/4.50  Clause #193 (by betaEtaReduce #[129]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Ne True True) (Eq a True)
% 4.28/4.50  Clause #194 (by clausification #[193]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq a True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq True False))
% 4.28/4.50  Clause #196 (by clausification #[194]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq a True) (Eq True False)
% 4.28/4.50  Clause #197 (by clausification #[196]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq a True
% 4.28/4.50  Clause #199 (by falseElim #[197]): False
% 4.28/4.50  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------