TSTP Solution File: SEU959^5 by LEO-II---1.7.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : LEO-II---1.7.0
% Problem : SEU959^5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : leo --timeout %d --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=./eprover %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 12:15:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 291.64s 291.79s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SEU959^5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : leo --timeout %d --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=./eprover %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 14:14:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 No.of.Axioms: 0
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 Length.of.Defs: 0
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 Contains.Choice.Funs: false
% 0.12/0.34 (rf:0,axioms:0,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:2,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:0,translation:fof_full).eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 25.16/25.39 ...eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 51.10/51.32 ..
% 54.59/54.76
% 54.59/54.76 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 54.59/54.76
% 54.59/54.76 248:[ 0:<(SV240@SV239)@((sK1_Xh@SV240)@SV239) = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV240@(sK2_Xx@SV240))@SV238 = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 27)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV238 SV239 SV240 ])
% 54.80/54.98 .
% 54.80/54.98
% 54.80/54.98 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 54.80/54.98
% 54.80/54.98 248:[ 0:<(SV240@SV239)@((sK1_Xh@SV240)@SV239) = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV240@(sK2_Xx@SV240))@SV238 = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 27)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV238 SV239 SV240 ])
% 55.42/55.63 ......
% 75.25/75.45 (rf:0,axioms:0,ps:2,u:1,ude:false,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:2,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:0,translation:fof_full).eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 100.22/100.49 .eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 125.42/125.59 .
% 125.42/125.60
% 125.42/125.60 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 125.42/125.60
% 125.42/125.60 67:[ 0:<(SV53@SV52)@((sK1_Xh@SV53)@SV52) = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV53@(sK2_Xx@SV53))@SV51 = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 26)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV51 SV52 SV53 ])
% 125.42/125.62
% 125.42/125.62 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 125.42/125.62
% 125.42/125.62 67:[ 0:<(SV53@SV52)@((sK1_Xh@SV53)@SV52) = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV53@(sK2_Xx@SV53))@SV51 = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 26)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV51 SV52 SV53 ])
% 125.52/125.68 .
% 125.53/125.70
% 125.53/125.70 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 125.53/125.70
% 125.53/125.70 95:[ 0:<(SV175@(sK2_Xx@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ ((SV175@SX0)@SX1)))))@SV174 = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV175@SV173)@((sK1_Xh@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ ((SV175@SX0)@SX1))))@SV173) = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 48)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV173 SV174 SV175 ])
% 125.55/125.72
% 125.55/125.72 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 125.55/125.72
% 125.55/125.72 95:[ 0:<(SV175@(sK2_Xx@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ ((SV175@SX0)@SX1)))))@SV174 = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV175@SV173)@((sK1_Xh@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ ((SV175@SX0)@SX1))))@SV173) = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 48)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV173 SV174 SV175 ])
% 125.65/125.85 .eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 150.14/150.30
% 150.14/150.30 (rf:0,axioms:0,ps:3,u:8,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:false,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:2,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:0,translation:fof_full)..eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 175.14/175.39 ..eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 201.25/201.45 ..
% 202.77/202.94
% 202.77/202.94 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 202.77/202.94
% 202.77/202.94 64:[ 0:<(SV355@SV354)@((sK1_Xh@SV355)@SV354) = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV355@(sK2_Xx@SV355))@SV353 = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 27)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV353 SV354 SV355 ])
% 203.17/203.35
% 203.17/203.35 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 203.17/203.35
% 203.17/203.35 64:[ 0:<(SV355@SV354)@((sK1_Xh@SV355)@SV354) = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV355@(sK2_Xx@SV355))@SV353 = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 27)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV353 SV354 SV355 ])
% 203.56/203.78 ......
% 225.14/225.37 (rf:2,axioms:0,ps:1,u:3,ude:true,rLeibEQ:false,rAndEQ:false,use_choice:false,use_extuni:false,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:2,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:0,translation:fof_full)..eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 275.25/275.47 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 275.44/275.59 .
% 275.44/275.60
% 275.44/275.60 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 275.44/275.60
% 275.44/275.60 55:[ 0:<(SV74@SV73)@((sK1_Xh@SV74)@SV73) = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV74@(sK2_Xx@SV74))@SV72 = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 27)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV72 SV73 SV74 ])
% 275.47/275.63
% 275.47/275.63 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 275.47/275.63
% 275.47/275.63 55:[ 0:<(SV74@SV73)@((sK1_Xh@SV74)@SV73) = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV74@(sK2_Xx@SV74))@SV72 = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 27)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV72 SV73 SV74 ])
% 275.63/275.83 ..
% 279.32/279.49
% 279.32/279.49 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 279.32/279.49
% 279.32/279.49 73:[ 0:<(SV327@(sK2_Xx@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ ((SV327@SX0)@SX1)))))@SV326 = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV327@SV325)@((sK1_Xh@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ ((SV327@SX0)@SX1))))@SV325) = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 46)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV325 SV326 SV327 ])
% 279.45/279.61
% 279.45/279.61 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 279.45/279.61
% 279.45/279.61 73:[ 0:<(SV327@(sK2_Xx@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ ((SV327@SX0)@SX1)))))@SV326 = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV327@SV325)@((sK1_Xh@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ ((SV327@SX0)@SX1))))@SV325) = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 46)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV325 SV326 SV327 ])
% 282.72/282.92 ..
% 291.64/291.79
% 291.64/291.79 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 291.64/291.79
% 291.64/291.79 96:[ 0:<(SV590@SV589)@((sK1_Xh@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ (~ ((SV590@SX0)@SX1)))))@SV589) = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV590@(sK2_Xx@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ (~ ((SV590@SX0)@SX1))))))@SV588 = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 91)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV588 SV589 SV590 ])
% 291.86/292.04
% 291.86/292.04 Prim_subst applied to clause
% 291.86/292.04
% 291.86/292.04 96:[ 0:<(SV590@SV589)@((sK1_Xh@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ (~ ((SV590@SX0)@SX1)))))@SV589) = $true>-w(1)-i() 1:<(SV590@(sK2_Xx@(^[SX0:$i,SX1:$i]: (~ (~ ((SV590@SX0)@SX1))))))@SV588 = $false>-w(1)-i() ]-mln(2)-w(2)-i(rename 91)-o(AXIOM)-fv([ SV588 SV589 SV590 ])
% 292.86/293.03 .
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------