TSTP Solution File: SEU950^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEU950^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:52:19 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SEU950^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 18:05:07 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 % (20585)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20583)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20586)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20587)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20584)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20589)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20586)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.37 % (20586)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20586)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20586)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.37 % (20586)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (20586)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.13/0.37 % (20586)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (20586)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20586)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20586)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20587)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37 % (20587)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20587)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20584)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37 % (20584)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20584)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20584)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (20584)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (20584)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (20584)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20584)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20584)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20587)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (20587)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.13/0.37 % (20587)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (20587)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20587)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20587)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20582)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20585)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.37 % (20583)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.37 % (20583)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20583)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20583)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.37 % (20583)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (20583)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (20589)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.37 % (20589)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20589)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20583)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (20583)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20589)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.37 % (20589)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.13/0.37 % (20583)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20583)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (20589)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (20589)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (20589)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20589)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20589)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20585)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37 thf(func_def_0, type, h: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(func_def_7, type, inv_h_2: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(func_def_8, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 $false),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f16])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ( ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (((sK0 @ inv_h_2) != X0)) )),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(superposition,[],[f10,f11])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ( ! [X3 : $i > $o] : (((inv_h_2 @ (h @ X3)) = X3)) )),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(injectivity,[],[f9])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ( ! [X3 : $i > $o,X4 : $i > $o] : (((h @ X3) != (h @ X4)) | (X3 = X4)) )),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) != (sK0 @ X0)) & ! [X3 : $i > $o,X4 : $i > $o] : (((h @ X3) != (h @ X4)) | (X3 = X4))),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f6,f7])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (? [X1 : $i > $o] : ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) != X1) => ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) != (sK0 @ X0)))),
% 0.13/0.37 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ! [X0 : $i > $i > $o] : ? [X1 : $i > $o] : ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) != X1) & ! [X3 : $i > $o,X4 : $i > $o] : (((h @ X3) != (h @ X4)) | (X3 = X4))),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(rectify,[],[f5])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ! [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : ? [X3 : $i > $o] : ! [X4] : ((X2 @ X4) != X3) & ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((h @ X0) != (h @ X1)) | (X0 = X1))),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ~(! [X1 : $i > $o,X0 : $i > $o] : (((h @ X0) = (h @ X1)) => (X0 = X1)) => ? [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : ! [X3 : $i > $o] : ? [X4] : ((X2 @ X4) = X3))),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.37 ~(! [X1 : $i > $o,X0 : $i > $o] : (((h @ X0) = (h @ X1)) => (X0 = X1)) => ? [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : ! [X3 : $i > $o] : ? [X4] : ((X2 @ X4) = X3))),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.37 ! [X1 : $i > $o,X0 : $i > $o] : (((h @ X0) = (h @ X1)) => (X0 = X1)) => ? [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : ! [X3 : $i > $o] : ? [X4] : ((X2 @ X4) = X3)),
% 0.13/0.37 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM573_pme)).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X2) != (sK0 @ X0))) )),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37 % (20585)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20585)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20585)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (20585)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (20585)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (20585)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (20585)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20585)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (20581)Success in time 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------