TSTP Solution File: SEU925^5 by cocATP---0.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : SEU925^5 : TPTP v6.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n097.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32286.75MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 17 13:33:23 EDT 2014

% Result   : Theorem 0.92s
% Output   : Proof 0.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % Problem  : SEU925^5 : TPTP v6.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% % Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% % Computer : n097.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% % Memory   : 32286.75MB
% % OS       : Linux 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64
% % CPULimit : 300
% % DateTime : Thu Jul 17 11:43:01 CDT 2014
% % CPUTime  : 0.92 
% Python 2.7.5
% Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% FOF formula (forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2)))->(((eq fofType) Xx) Xy))) of role conjecture named cTHM7_TPS2_pme
% Conjecture to prove = (forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2)))->(((eq fofType) Xx) Xy))):Prop
% Parameter fofType_DUMMY:fofType.
% We need to prove ['(forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2)))->(((eq fofType) Xx) Xy)))']
% Parameter fofType:Type.
% Trying to prove (forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2)))->(((eq fofType) Xx) Xy)))
% Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 Xx):(((eq fofType) Xx) Xx)
% Found (eq_ref0 Xx) as proof of (((eq fofType) Xx) Xx)
% Found ((eq_ref fofType) Xx) as proof of (((eq fofType) Xx) Xx)
% Found ((eq_ref fofType) Xx) as proof of (((eq fofType) Xx) Xx)
% Found (x0 ((eq_ref fofType) Xx)) as proof of (((eq fofType) Xy) Xx)
% Found ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx)) as proof of (((eq fofType) Xy) Xx)
% Found ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx)) as proof of (((eq fofType) Xy) Xx)
% Found (eq_sym000 ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx))) as proof of (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy)
% Found ((eq_sym00 Xx) ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx))) as proof of (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy)
% Found (((eq_sym0 Xy) Xx) ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx))) as proof of (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy)
% Found ((((eq_sym fofType) Xy) Xx) ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx))) as proof of (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy)
% Found (fun (x:(((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2))))=> ((((eq_sym fofType) Xy) Xx) ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx)))) as proof of (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy)
% Found (fun (Xy:fofType) (x:(((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2))))=> ((((eq_sym fofType) Xy) Xx) ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx)))) as proof of ((((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2)))->(((eq fofType) Xx) Xy))
% Found (fun (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType) (x:(((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2))))=> ((((eq_sym fofType) Xy) Xx) ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx)))) as proof of (forall (Xy:fofType), ((((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2)))->(((eq fofType) Xx) Xy)))
% Found (fun (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType) (x:(((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2))))=> ((((eq_sym fofType) Xy) Xx) ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx)))) as proof of (forall (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType), ((((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2)))->(((eq fofType) Xx) Xy)))
% Got proof (fun (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType) (x:(((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2))))=> ((((eq_sym fofType) Xy) Xx) ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx))))
% Time elapsed = 0.605418s
% node=110 cost=41.000000 depth=13
% ::::::::::::::::::::::
% % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% (fun (Xx:fofType) (Xy:fofType) (x:(((eq (fofType->Prop)) (fun (Xy0:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xx) Xy0))) (fun (Xy_2:fofType)=> (((eq fofType) Xy) Xy_2))))=> ((((eq_sym fofType) Xy) Xx) ((x (fun (x1:(fofType->Prop))=> (x1 Xx))) ((eq_ref fofType) Xx))))
% % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% EOF
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------