%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEU925^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:44:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.24s 3.58s
% Output   : Proof 3.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : SEU925^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Wed Aug 23 15:52:57 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.24/3.58  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.24/3.58  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), (Eq (fun Xy0 => Eq Xx Xy0) fun Xy_2 => Eq Xy Xy_2) → Eq Xx Xy)) True
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #1 (by betaEtaReduce #[0]): Eq (Not (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq (Eq Xx) (Eq Xy) → Eq Xx Xy)) True
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy : Iota), Eq (Eq Xx) (Eq Xy) → Eq Xx Xy) False
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (∀ (Xy : Iota), Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a)) (Eq Xy) → Eq (skS.0 0 a) Xy)) True
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xy : Iota), Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a)) (Eq Xy) → Eq (skS.0 0 a) Xy) False
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Not (Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a)) (Eq (skS.0 1 a a_1)) → Eq (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1))) True
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a)) (Eq (skS.0 1 a a_1)) → Eq (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a)) (Eq (skS.0 1 a a_1))) True
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) False
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #9 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a)) (Eq (skS.0 1 a a_1))
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #10 (by argument congruence #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a) a_1) (Eq (skS.0 1 a a_2) a_1)
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #11 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Ne (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #14 (by eqHoist #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (Eq (skS.0 0 a) a_1) False) (Eq (skS.0 1 a a_2) a_1)
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (skS.0 1 a a_1) a_2) (Ne (skS.0 0 a) a_2)
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #16 (by destructive equality resolution #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a)
% 3.24/3.58  Clause #17 (by forward contextual literal cutting #[16, 11]): False
% 3.24/3.58  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------