TSTP Solution File: SEU895^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEU895^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:52:06 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   23
%            Number of leaves      :   22
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  118 (   9 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  777 ( 311 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  867 (  80   ~; 231   |;  85   &; 424   @)
%                                         (   9 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   21 (  17 usr;  16 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (   0  !!;  38  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  102 (  58   ^  34   !;   9   ?; 102   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    b: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    f: b > a ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    y: b > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    x: b > $o ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    ph1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    sK2: a ).

thf(func_def_18,type,
    sK3: b ).

thf(func_def_19,type,
    sK4: b ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    sK5: b ).

thf(f149,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f81,f86,f95,f96,f101,f102,f103,f104,f112,f113,f122,f131,f140,f148]) ).

thf(f148,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f147]) ).

thf(f147,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f143,f85]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
      = sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f83]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> ( ( f @ sK3 )
      = sK2 ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).

thf(f143,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
     != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f141]) ).

thf(f141,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
     != sK2 )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f72,f110]) ).

thf(f110,plain,
    ( ! [X2: b] :
        ( ( ( x @ X2 )
          = $false )
        | ( sK2
         != ( f @ X2 ) ) )
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f109]) ).

thf(f109,plain,
    ( spl0_9
  <=> ! [X2: b] :
        ( ( sK2
         != ( f @ X2 ) )
        | ( ( x @ X2 )
          = $false ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_9])]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ( ( ( x @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f70]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> ( ( x @ sK3 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

thf(f140,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f139]) ).

thf(f139,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f135,f80]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f78]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).

thf(f135,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
     != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f134]) ).

thf(f134,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
     != sK2 )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_7
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f107,f100]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f98]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ( spl0_7
  <=> ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_7])]) ).

thf(f107,plain,
    ( ! [X1: b] :
        ( ( ( y @ X1 )
          = $false )
        | ( ( f @ X1 )
         != sK2 ) )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f106]) ).

thf(f106,plain,
    ( spl0_8
  <=> ! [X1: b] :
        ( ( ( y @ X1 )
          = $false )
        | ( ( f @ X1 )
         != sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_8])]) ).

thf(f131,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f130]) ).

thf(f130,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f126,f76]) ).

thf(f76,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
      = sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f74]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ( ( f @ sK4 )
      = sK2 ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).

thf(f126,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
     != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f124]) ).

thf(f124,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ( ( f @ sK4 )
     != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f94,f107]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ( ( y @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f92]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ( spl0_6
  <=> ( ( y @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])]) ).

thf(f122,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f121]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f117,f76]) ).

thf(f117,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
     != sK2 )
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f116]) ).

thf(f116,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
     != sK2 )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f90,f110]) ).

thf(f90,plain,
    ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f88]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( spl0_5
  <=> ( ( x @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])]) ).

thf(f113,plain,
    ( spl0_8
    | spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f25,f106,f106]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( y @ X2 ) )
      | ( sK2
       != ( f @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( f @ X1 )
       != sK2 )
      | ( ( y @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ( f @ X2 )
          = sK2 ) )
      | ( ( f @ X1 )
       != sK2 )
      | ( $false
        = ( y @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( y @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( ( f @ X1 )
       != sK2 )
      | ( $false
        = ( ( y @ X2 )
          & ( ( f @ X2 )
            = sK2 ) ) )
      | ( ( y @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ( x @ X1 )
          | ( y @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( f @ X1 )
       != sK2 )
      | ( $false
        = ( ( y @ X2 )
          & ( ( f @ X2 )
            = sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ( f @ X1 )
          = sK2 ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( ( x @ X1 )
          | ( y @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( $false
        = ( ( y @ X2 )
          & ( ( f @ X2 )
            = sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( ( ( ( x @ X1 )
            | ( y @ X1 ) )
          & ( ( f @ X1 )
            = sK2 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $false
        = ( ( y @ X2 )
          & ( ( f @ X2 )
            = sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( ( ( ( x @ X1 )
            | ( y @ X1 ) )
          & ( ( f @ X1 )
            = sK2 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: b] :
              ( ( y @ Y0 )
              & ( ( f @ Y0 )
                = sK2 ) )
          @ X2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X1: b] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y0: b] :
              ( ( y @ Y0 )
              & ( ( f @ Y0 )
                = sK2 ) ) ) )
      | ( ( ( ( x @ X1 )
            | ( y @ X1 ) )
          & ( ( f @ X1 )
            = sK2 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X1: b] :
      ( ( ( ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y0: b] :
                ( ( y @ Y0 )
                & ( ( f @ Y0 )
                  = sK2 ) ) )
          | ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y0: b] :
                ( ( ( f @ Y0 )
                  = sK2 )
                & ( x @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ( ( x @ X1 )
            | ( y @ X1 ) )
          & ( ( f @ X1 )
            = sK2 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X1: b] :
      ( ( ( ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y0: b] :
                ( ( y @ Y0 )
                & ( ( f @ Y0 )
                  = sK2 ) ) )
          | ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y0: b] :
                ( ( ( f @ Y0 )
                  = sK2 )
                & ( x @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: b] :
              ( ( ( x @ Y0 )
                | ( y @ Y0 ) )
              & ( ( f @ Y0 )
                = sK2 ) )
          @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( ( x @ Y0 )
              | ( y @ Y0 ) )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) ) ) )
    | ( ( ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y0: b] :
              ( ( y @ Y0 )
              & ( ( f @ Y0 )
                = sK2 ) ) )
        | ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y0: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ Y0 )
                = sK2 )
              & ( x @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( y @ Y0 )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) ) )
      | ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 )
            & ( x @ Y0 ) ) ) )
   != ( ?? @ b
      @ ^ [Y0: b] :
          ( ( ( x @ Y0 )
            | ( y @ Y0 ) )
          & ( ( f @ Y0 )
            = sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y1: b] :
                ( ( y @ Y1 )
                & ( ( f @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 ) ) )
          | ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y1: b] :
                ( ( ( f @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 )
                & ( x @ Y1 ) ) ) )
      @ sK2 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y1: b] :
              ( ( ( x @ Y1 )
                | ( y @ Y1 ) )
              & ( ( f @ Y1 )
                = Y0 ) ) )
      @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y1: b] :
              ( ( ( x @ Y1 )
                | ( y @ Y1 ) )
              & ( ( f @ Y1 )
                = Y0 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y1: b] :
                ( ( y @ Y1 )
                & ( ( f @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 ) ) )
          | ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y1: b] :
                ( ( ( f @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 )
                & ( x @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y1: b] :
              ( ( ( x @ Y1 )
                | ( y @ Y1 ) )
              & ( ( f @ Y1 )
                = Y0 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y1: b] :
                ( ( y @ Y1 )
                & ( ( f @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 ) ) )
          | ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y1: b] :
                ( ( ( f @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 )
                & ( x @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y1: b] :
              ( ( ( x @ Y1 )
                | ( y @ Y1 ) )
              & ( ( f @ Y1 )
                = Y0 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y1: b] :
                ( ( y @ Y1 )
                & ( ( f @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 ) ) )
          | ( ?? @ b
            @ ^ [Y1: b] :
                ( ( ( f @ Y1 )
                  = Y0 )
                & ( x @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a] :
        ? [X1: b] :
          ( ( ( f @ X1 )
            = X0 )
          & ( ( y @ X1 )
            | ( x @ X1 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [X2: a] :
          ( ? [X3: b] :
              ( ( x @ X3 )
              & ( ( f @ X3 )
                = X2 ) )
          | ? [X4: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ X4 )
                = X2 )
              & ( y @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a] :
        ? [X1: b] :
          ( ( ( f @ X1 )
            = X0 )
          & ( ( y @ X1 )
            | ( x @ X1 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [X0: a] :
          ( ? [X1: b] :
              ( ( x @ X1 )
              & ( ( f @ X1 )
                = X0 ) )
          | ? [X1: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ X1 )
                = X0 )
              & ( y @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a] :
        ? [X1: b] :
          ( ( ( f @ X1 )
            = X0 )
          & ( ( y @ X1 )
            | ( x @ X1 ) ) ) )
    = ( ^ [X0: a] :
          ( ? [X1: b] :
              ( ( x @ X1 )
              & ( ( f @ X1 )
                = X0 ) )
          | ? [X1: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ X1 )
                = X0 )
              & ( y @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cX5202_pme) ).

thf(f112,plain,
    ( spl0_9
    | spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f33,f109,f109]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( ( f @ X1 )
       != sK2 )
      | ( sK2
       != ( f @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( x @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( x @ X2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ( f @ X2 )
          = sK2 ) )
      | ( ( x @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( f @ X1 )
       != sK2 )
      | ( ( x @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( ( f @ X1 )
       != sK2 )
      | ( ( ( ( f @ X2 )
            = sK2 )
          & ( x @ X2 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( x @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( ( f @ X1 )
       != sK2 )
      | ( $false
        = ( ( x @ X1 )
          | ( y @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( ( ( f @ X2 )
            = sK2 )
          & ( x @ X2 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X2: b,X1: b] :
      ( ( ( f @ X1 )
       != sK2 )
      | ( $false
        = ( ( x @ X1 )
          | ( y @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ Y0 )
                = sK2 )
              & ( x @ Y0 ) )
          @ X2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X1: b] :
      ( ( ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y0: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ Y0 )
                = sK2 )
              & ( x @ Y0 ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $false
        = ( ( x @ X1 )
          | ( y @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( f @ X1 )
       != sK2 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X1: b] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ( f @ X1 )
          = sK2 ) )
      | ( ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y0: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ Y0 )
                = sK2 )
              & ( x @ Y0 ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $false
        = ( ( x @ X1 )
          | ( y @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X1: b] :
      ( ( ( ( ( x @ X1 )
            | ( y @ X1 ) )
          & ( ( f @ X1 )
            = sK2 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y0: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ Y0 )
                = sK2 )
              & ( x @ Y0 ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f104,plain,
    ( spl0_6
    | spl0_4
    | spl0_7
    | spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f50,f88,f98,f83,f92]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ sK3 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f49]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f47]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( x @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f46]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
        | ( y @ sK4 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f44]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
          | ( y @ sK4 ) )
        & ( ( f @ sK4 )
          = sK2 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( ( ( ( y @ sK5 )
        & ( ( f @ sK5 )
          = sK2 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
          | ( y @ sK4 ) )
        & ( ( f @ sK4 )
          = sK2 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( y @ Y0 )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) )
        @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
          | ( y @ sK4 ) )
        & ( ( f @ sK4 )
          = sK2 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( y @ Y0 )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
          | ( y @ sK4 ) )
        & ( ( f @ sK4 )
          = sK2 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( y @ Y0 )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( ( x @ Y0 )
              | ( y @ Y0 ) )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) )
        @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( ( x @ Y0 )
              | ( y @ Y0 ) )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( y @ Y0 )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( y @ Y0 )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 )
            & ( x @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( ( x @ Y0 )
              | ( y @ Y0 ) )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 )
            & ( x @ Y0 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( ( x @ Y0 )
              | ( y @ Y0 ) )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( y @ Y0 )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y0: b] :
              ( ( y @ Y0 )
              & ( ( f @ Y0 )
                = sK2 ) ) )
        | ( ?? @ b
          @ ^ [Y0: b] :
              ( ( ( f @ Y0 )
                = sK2 )
              & ( x @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ?? @ b
        @ ^ [Y0: b] :
            ( ( ( x @ Y0 )
              | ( y @ Y0 ) )
            & ( ( f @ Y0 )
              = sK2 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f103,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_7
    | spl0_5
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f48,f92,f88,f98,f70]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ( ( ( x @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( x @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f47]) ).

thf(f102,plain,
    ( spl0_4
    | spl0_7
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f54,f74,f98,f83]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ( ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ sK4 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( f @ sK3 )
      = sK2 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f53]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ sK4 )
      = sK2 ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ sK4 )
      = sK2 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f45]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f44]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ( spl0_2
    | spl0_1
    | spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f52,f98,f70,f74]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( y @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( x @ sK3 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f96,plain,
    ( spl0_5
    | spl0_4
    | spl0_3
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f61,f92,f78,f83,f88]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( f @ sK3 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( x @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f60]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f58]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( y @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f57]) ).

thf(f57,plain,
    ( ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
        | ( y @ sK4 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f56]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
        | ( y @ sK4 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( x @ sK4 )
          | ( y @ sK4 ) )
        & ( ( f @ sK4 )
          = sK2 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( spl0_5
    | spl0_6
    | spl0_1
    | spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f59,f78,f70,f92,f88]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( y @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( x @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( x @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f58]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    ( spl0_2
    | spl0_4
    | spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f66,f78,f83,f74]) ).

thf(f66,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( f @ sK4 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f65]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( f @ sK3 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f64]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f63]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f55]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( f @ sK3 )
          = sK2 )
        & ( x @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2
    | spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f68,f78,f74,f70]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( f @ sK4 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( x @ sK3 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f67]) ).

thf(f67,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
      = sK2 )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( x @ sK3 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( ( ( f @ sK5 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( x @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( f @ sK4 )
        = sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f55]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem    : SEU895^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.16  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.39  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.39  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.39  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.39  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.39  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.39  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 17:29:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.39  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.39  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.40  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41  % (31598)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31595)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31597)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31596)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31599)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31600)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31601)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31602)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31598)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.41  % (31598)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (31598)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31598)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.41  % (31598)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % (31599)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.41  % (31599)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (31599)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31599)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.41  % (31599)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % (31599)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.15/0.41  % (31599)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41  % (31599)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31599)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (31599)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (31598)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.15/0.41  % (31598)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41  % (31598)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.41  % (31598)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % (31598)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  % (31602)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.42  % (31602)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  % (31602)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.42  % (31602)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  % (31602)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.42  % (31602)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.42  % (31602)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.42  % (31602)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  % (31602)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  % (31596)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.42  % (31596)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  % (31596)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.42  % (31596)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.42  % (31596)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  % (31596)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.42  % (31596)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42  % (31596)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.15/0.42  % (31596)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  % (31596)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  % (31595)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.42  % (31597)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.42  % (31595)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.42  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42  % (31595)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  % (31595)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.42  % (31595)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  % (31595)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.42  % (31595)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.42  % (31595)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.15/0.42  % (31595)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  % (31595)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  % (31594)Success in time 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.42  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------