TSTP Solution File: SEU886^5 by LEO-II---1.7.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : LEO-II---1.7.0
% Problem : SEU886^5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : leo --timeout %d --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=./eprover %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 12:15:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 57 ( 43 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 223 ( 96 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 243 ( 66 ~; 26 |; 35 &; 112 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 2 usr)
% Number of type conns : 3 ( 3 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 ^ 15 !; 19 ?; 34 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tp_a,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(tp_b,type,
b: $tType ).
thf(tp_f,type,
f: b > a ).
thf(tp_sK1_Xx0,type,
sK1_Xx0: a ).
thf(tp_sK2_SY4,type,
sK2_SY4: b ).
thf(tp_x,type,
x: b > $o ).
thf(tp_y,type,
y: b > $o ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [Xx0: a] :
( ? [Xt: b] :
( ( x @ Xt )
& ( y @ Xt )
& ( Xx0
= ( f @ Xt ) ) )
=> ( ? [Xt: b] :
( ( x @ Xt )
& ( Xx0
= ( f @ Xt ) ) )
& ? [Xt: b] :
( ( y @ Xt )
& ( Xx0
= ( f @ Xt ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cX5203_pme) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
( ( ! [Xx0: a] :
( ? [Xt: b] :
( ( x @ Xt )
& ( y @ Xt )
& ( Xx0
= ( f @ Xt ) ) )
=> ( ? [Xt: b] :
( ( x @ Xt )
& ( Xx0
= ( f @ Xt ) ) )
& ? [Xt: b] :
( ( y @ Xt )
& ( Xx0
= ( f @ Xt ) ) ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(3,plain,
( ( ! [Xx0: a] :
( ? [Xt: b] :
( ( x @ Xt )
& ( y @ Xt )
& ( Xx0
= ( f @ Xt ) ) )
=> ( ? [Xt: b] :
( ( x @ Xt )
& ( Xx0
= ( f @ Xt ) ) )
& ? [Xt: b] :
( ( y @ Xt )
& ( Xx0
= ( f @ Xt ) ) ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(4,plain,
( ( ? [SY4: b] :
( ( x @ SY4 )
& ( y @ SY4 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SY4 ) ) )
=> ( ? [SY5: b] :
( ( x @ SY5 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SY5 ) ) )
& ? [SY6: b] :
( ( y @ SY6 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SY6 ) ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_forall_neg,[status(esa)],[3]) ).
thf(5,plain,
( ( ? [SY4: b] :
( ( x @ SY4 )
& ( y @ SY4 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SY4 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(standard_cnf,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(6,plain,
( ( ? [SY5: b] :
( ( x @ SY5 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SY5 ) ) )
& ? [SY6: b] :
( ( y @ SY6 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SY6 ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(standard_cnf,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(7,plain,
( ( ? [SY5: b] :
( ( x @ SY5 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SY5 ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(split_conjecture,[split_conjecture(split,[])],[6]) ).
thf(8,plain,
( ( ? [SY6: b] :
( ( y @ SY6 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SY6 ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(split_conjecture,[split_conjecture(split,[])],[6]) ).
thf(9,plain,
( ( ~ ? [SY5: b] :
( ( x @ SY5 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SY5 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(10,plain,
( ( ~ ? [SY6: b] :
( ( y @ SY6 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SY6 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(11,plain,
( ( ! [SY5: b] :
( ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ SY5 ) )
| ~ ( x @ SY5 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_combined,[status(esa)],[9]) ).
thf(12,plain,
( ( ! [SY6: b] :
( ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ SY6 ) )
| ~ ( y @ SY6 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_combined,[status(esa)],[10]) ).
thf(13,plain,
( ( ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
& ( y @ sK2_SY4 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ sK2_SY4 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_combined,[status(esa)],[5]) ).
thf(14,plain,
( ( ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
& ( y @ sK2_SY4 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ sK2_SY4 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(15,plain,
( ( ! [SY5: b] :
( ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ SY5 ) )
| ~ ( x @ SY5 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(16,plain,
( ( ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
| ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) )
| ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ sK2_SY4 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(17,plain,
! [SV1: b] :
( ( ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ SV1 ) )
| ~ ( x @ SV1 ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(18,plain,
( ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
| ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) )
| ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ sK2_SY4 ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(19,plain,
! [SV1: b] :
( ( ( ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ SV1 ) ) )
= $true )
| ( ( ~ ( x @ SV1 ) )
= $true ) ),
inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(20,plain,
( ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
| ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(21,plain,
( ( ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ sK2_SY4 ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(22,plain,
! [SV1: b] :
( ( ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SV1 ) )
= $false )
| ( ( ~ ( x @ SV1 ) )
= $true ) ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(23,plain,
( ( ~ ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
| ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(24,plain,
( ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ sK2_SY4 ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [SV1: b] :
( ( ( x @ SV1 )
= $false )
| ( ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SV1 ) )
= $false ) ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
thf(26,plain,
( ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
| ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(27,plain,
( ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
thf(28,plain,
( ( ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
thf(29,plain,
( ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
thf(30,plain,
( ( y @ sK2_SY4 )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
thf(31,plain,
$false = $true,
inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[24,30,29,25]) ).
thf(32,plain,
( ( ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
& ( y @ sK2_SY4 )
& ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ sK2_SY4 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(33,plain,
( ( ! [SY6: b] :
( ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ SY6 ) )
| ~ ( y @ SY6 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(34,plain,
( ( ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
| ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) )
| ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ sK2_SY4 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[32]) ).
thf(35,plain,
! [SV2: b] :
( ( ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ SV2 ) )
| ~ ( y @ SV2 ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[33]) ).
thf(36,plain,
( ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
| ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) )
| ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ sK2_SY4 ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[34]) ).
thf(37,plain,
! [SV2: b] :
( ( ( ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ SV2 ) ) )
= $true )
| ( ( ~ ( y @ SV2 ) )
= $true ) ),
inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[35]) ).
thf(38,plain,
( ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
| ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[36]) ).
thf(39,plain,
( ( ( sK1_Xx0
!= ( f @ sK2_SY4 ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[36]) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [SV2: b] :
( ( ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SV2 ) )
= $false )
| ( ( ~ ( y @ SV2 ) )
= $true ) ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[37]) ).
thf(41,plain,
( ( ~ ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
| ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[38]) ).
thf(42,plain,
( ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ sK2_SY4 ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[39]) ).
thf(43,plain,
! [SV2: b] :
( ( ( y @ SV2 )
= $false )
| ( ( sK1_Xx0
= ( f @ SV2 ) )
= $false ) ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[40]) ).
thf(44,plain,
( ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
| ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[41]) ).
thf(45,plain,
( ( ~ ( x @ sK2_SY4 ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[44]) ).
thf(46,plain,
( ( ~ ( y @ sK2_SY4 ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[44]) ).
thf(47,plain,
( ( x @ sK2_SY4 )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[45]) ).
thf(48,plain,
( ( y @ sK2_SY4 )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[46]) ).
thf(49,plain,
$false = $true,
inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[42,48,47,43]) ).
thf(50,plain,
$false,
inference(solved_all_splits,[solved_all_splits(join,[])],[49,31]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SEU886^5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.12 % Command : leo --timeout %d --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=./eprover %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 02:50:48 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.34
% 0.19/0.34 No.of.Axioms: 0
% 0.19/0.34
% 0.19/0.34 Length.of.Defs: 0
% 0.19/0.34
% 0.19/0.34 Contains.Choice.Funs: false
% 0.19/0.34 (rf:0,axioms:0,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:2,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:0,translation:fof_full).
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ********************************
% 0.19/0.38 * All subproblems solved! *
% 0.19/0.38 ********************************
% 0.19/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:1,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:49,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 %**** Beginning of derivation protocol ****
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 %**** End of derivation protocol ****
% 0.19/0.39 %**** no. of clauses in derivation: 50 ****
% 0.19/0.39 %**** clause counter: 49 ****
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:1,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:49,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------