TSTP Solution File: SEU834^5 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SEU834^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:30:38 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   3 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    6 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (   3   ~;   0   |;   4   &;  11   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    4 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0   ^   6   !;   0   ?;   6   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_22,type,
    epred1_0: a > $o ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    epred2_0: a > $o ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    esk1_0: a ).

thf(cGAZING_THM21_pme,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
        & ( X2 @ X3 ) )
     => ( X2 @ X3 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cGAZING_THM21_pme) ).

thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
          & ( X2 @ X3 ) )
       => ( X2 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cGAZING_THM21_pme]) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 )
    & ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 )
    & ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    epred2_0 @ esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SEU834^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 15:22:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.52  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.54  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # new_bool_9 with pid 26290 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Result found by new_bool_9
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.54  # Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # new_ho_10 with pid 26297 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.54  # Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.21/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.21/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.21/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 0.21/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 0.21/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.21/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.21/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 3
% 0.21/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 140
% 0.21/0.54  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 57
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54  # User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.54  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1620 pages
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.54  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.21/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.54  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------