TSTP Solution File: SEU610_8 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEU610_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:49:58 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.58s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SEU610_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 17:39:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  This is a TX0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/0.74  % (18473)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18474)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18467)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18469)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18468)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18470)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18472)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18471)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18473)First to succeed.
% 0.58/0.74  % (18473)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-18463"
% 0.58/0.74  % (18474)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18474)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (18474)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18474)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.58/0.74  
% 0.58/0.74  % (18474)Memory used [KB]: 959
% 0.58/0.74  % (18474)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.58/0.74  % (18474)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18473)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.58/0.74  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.74  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f54,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    $false),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f53,f43])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f43,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ( ! [X0] : (~in(X0,emptyset)) )),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f29,f33])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f33,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ( ! [X0] : (~in(X0,emptyset) | ~emptysetE) )),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f22,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ! [X0] : (! [X1 : $o] : X1 | ~in(X0,emptyset)) | ~emptysetE),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f19,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    emptysetE => ! [X0] : (in(X0,emptyset) => ! [X1 : $o] : X1)),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f9])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f9,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    emptysetE <=> ! [X0] : (in(X0,emptyset) => ! [X1 : $o] : X1)),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(flattening,[],[f8])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f8,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    (emptysetE = ! [X0] : (in(X0,emptyset) => ! [X1 : $o] : X1))),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f1,axiom,(
% 0.58/0.74    (emptysetE = ! [X0] : (in(X0,emptyset) => ! [X1 : $o] : X1))),
% 0.58/0.74    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',emptysetE)).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f29,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    emptysetE),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f21,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ? [X0,X1] : (~subset(X0,X1) & emptyset = setminus(X0,X1)) & setminusI & subsetI2 & in__Cong & emptysetE),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(flattening,[],[f20])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f20,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    (((? [X0,X1] : (~subset(X0,X1) & emptyset = setminus(X0,X1)) & setminusI) & subsetI2) & in__Cong) & emptysetE),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f7,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ~(emptysetE => (in__Cong => (subsetI2 => (setminusI => ! [X0,X1] : (emptyset = setminus(X0,X1) => subset(X0,X1))))))),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(rectify,[],[f6])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f6,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.58/0.74    ~(emptysetE => (in__Cong => (subsetI2 => (setminusI => ! [X2,X3] : (emptyset = setminus(X2,X3) => subset(X2,X3))))))),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f5])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f5,conjecture,(
% 0.58/0.74    emptysetE => (in__Cong => (subsetI2 => (setminusI => ! [X2,X3] : (emptyset = setminus(X2,X3) => subset(X2,X3)))))),
% 0.58/0.74    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setminusSubset1)).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f53,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    in(sK2(sK0,sK1),emptyset)),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f52,f27])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f27,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    emptyset = setminus(sK0,sK1)),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f52,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    in(sK2(sK0,sK1),setminus(sK0,sK1))),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f32,f44,f45,f34])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f34,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ( ! [X2,X0,X1] : (in(X2,setminus(X0,X1)) | ~in(X2,X0) | in(X2,X1) | ~setminusI) )),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f24,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ! [X0,X1,X2] : (in(X2,setminus(X0,X1)) | in(X2,X1) | ~in(X2,X0)) | ~setminusI),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(flattening,[],[f23])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f23,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ! [X0,X1,X2] : ((in(X2,setminus(X0,X1)) | in(X2,X1)) | ~in(X2,X0)) | ~setminusI),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f16,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    setminusI => ! [X0,X1,X2] : (in(X2,X0) => (~in(X2,X1) => in(X2,setminus(X0,X1))))),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f11])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f11,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    setminusI <=> ! [X0,X1,X2] : (in(X2,X0) => (~in(X2,X1) => in(X2,setminus(X0,X1))))),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(flattening,[],[f10])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f10,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    (setminusI = ! [X0,X1,X2] : (in(X2,X0) => (~in(X2,X1) => in(X2,setminus(X0,X1)))))),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(rectify,[],[f4])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f4,axiom,(
% 0.58/0.74    (setminusI = ! [X2,X3,X0] : (in(X0,X2) => (~in(X0,X3) => in(X0,setminus(X2,X3)))))),
% 0.58/0.74    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setminusI)).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f45,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ~in(sK2(sK0,sK1),sK1)),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f31,f28,f38])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f38,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ( ! [X0,X1] : (~in(sK2(X0,X1),X1) | ~subsetI2 | subset(X0,X1)) )),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f26,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ! [X0,X1] : (subset(X0,X1) | ? [X2] : (~in(X2,X1) & in(X2,X0))) | ~subsetI2),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f17,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    subsetI2 => ! [X0,X1] : (! [X2] : (in(X2,X0) => in(X2,X1)) => subset(X0,X1))),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f15])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f15,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    subsetI2 <=> ! [X0,X1] : (! [X2] : (in(X2,X0) => in(X2,X1)) => subset(X0,X1))),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(flattening,[],[f14])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f14,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    (subsetI2 = ! [X0,X1] : (! [X2] : (in(X2,X0) => in(X2,X1)) => subset(X0,X1)))),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f3,axiom,(
% 0.58/0.74    (subsetI2 = ! [X2,X3] : (! [X0] : (in(X0,X2) => in(X0,X3)) => subset(X2,X3)))),
% 0.58/0.74    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subsetI2)).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f28,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ~subset(sK0,sK1)),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f31,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    subsetI2),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f44,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    in(sK2(sK0,sK1),sK0)),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f31,f28,f37])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f37,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    ( ! [X0,X1] : (in(sK2(X0,X1),X0) | ~subsetI2 | subset(X0,X1)) )),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26])).
% 0.58/0.74  fof(f32,plain,(
% 0.58/0.74    setminusI),
% 0.58/0.74    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 0.58/0.74  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.74  % (18473)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74  % (18473)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18473)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.58/0.74  
% 0.58/0.74  % (18473)Memory used [KB]: 968
% 0.58/0.74  % (18473)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.58/0.74  % (18473)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.58/0.74  % (18463)Success in time 0.38 s
% 0.58/0.74  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------