TSTP Solution File: SEU599^2 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12
% Problem  : SEU599^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:42:54 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 3.59s 2.29s
% Output   : Refutation 3.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  11 unt;   9 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   77 (  18 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  191 (  18   ~;  13   |;   0   &; 138   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  22  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0   ^  50   !;   0   ?;  50   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_type,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(in__Cong_type,type,
    in__Cong: $o ).

thf(in__Cong_def,definition,
    ( in__Cong
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( A = B )
         => ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
              ( ( C = D )
             => ( ( in @ C @ A )
                = ( in @ D @ B ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(subset_type,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(subsetI1_type,type,
    subsetI1: $o ).

thf(subsetI1_def,definition,
    ( subsetI1
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( in @ C @ A )
             => ( in @ C @ B ) )
         => ( subset @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(binintersect_type,type,
    binintersect: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(binintersectER_type,type,
    binintersectER: $o ).

thf(binintersectER_def,definition,
    ( binintersectER
    = ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( in @ C @ ( binintersect @ A @ B ) )
         => ( in @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( in__Cong
   => ( subsetI1
     => ( binintersectER
       => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ( ( binintersect @ A @ B )
              = A )
           => ( subset @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',binintersectSubset1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( in__Cong
     => ( subsetI1
       => ( binintersectER
         => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
              ( ( ( binintersect @ A @ B )
                = A )
             => ( subset @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( A = B )
         => ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
              ( ( C = D )
             => ( ( in @ C @ A )
                = ( in @ D @ B ) ) ) )
     => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
            ( ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( in @ C @ A )
               => ( in @ C @ B ) )
           => ( subset @ A @ B ) )
       => ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
              ( ( in @ C @ ( binintersect @ A @ B ) )
             => ( in @ C @ B ) )
         => ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
              ( ( ( binintersect @ A @ B )
                = A )
             => ( subset @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ A )
      | ( subset @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ A )
      | ( subset @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( binintersect @ sk2 @ sk3 )
    = sk2 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( binintersect @ sk2 @ sk3 )
    = sk2 ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ C @ ( binintersect @ A @ B ) )
      | ( in @ C @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ C @ ( binintersect @ A @ B ) )
      | ( in @ C @ B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ C @ sk2 )
      | ( in @ C @ B )
      | ( ( binintersect @ sk2 @ sk3 )
       != ( binintersect @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[14,13]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ A @ sk2 )
      | ( in @ A @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[18:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 )),bind(B,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ A @ sk2 )
      | ( in @ A @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ B )
      | ( subset @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ B )
      | ( subset @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ( subset @ sk2 @ sk3 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ B )
      | ( ( subset @ A @ B )
       != ( subset @ sk2 @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[10,7]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ~ ( in @ ( sk1 @ sk3 @ sk2 ) @ sk3 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[16:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 )),bind(B,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ A @ sk2 )
      | ( ( in @ A @ sk3 )
       != ( in @ ( sk1 @ sk3 @ sk2 ) @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[20,17]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ~ ( in @ ( sk1 @ sk3 @ sk2 ) @ sk2 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[25:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 @ sk3 @ sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( subset @ A @ B )
      | ( ( in @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) @ A )
       != ( in @ ( sk1 @ sk3 @ sk2 ) @ sk2 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[15,26]) ).

thf(48,plain,
    subset @ sk2 @ sk3,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[47:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 )),bind(B,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(51,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[48,7]) ).

thf(52,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[51]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem  : SEU599^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.02/0.12  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 19 17:47:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.02/0.96  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.28/1.13  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (168ms). 
% 1.28/1.14  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.93/1.50  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 1.93/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.02/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.19/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.19/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.19/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.19/1.66  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.59/2.29  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.59/2.29  % Time passed: 1811ms (effective reasoning time: 1143ms)
% 3.59/2.29  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.59/2.29  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.59/2.29  % No. of inferences in proof: 23
% 3.59/2.29  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1811 ms resp. 1143 ms w/o parsing
% 3.59/2.34  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.59/2.34  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------