TSTP Solution File: SEU531_8 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEU531_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:49:24 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   55 (  17 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  283 (  50 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  171 (  58   ~;  49   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   8 <=>;  36  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :  144 ( 122 fml;  22 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   1   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   17 (  14 usr;  13 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :   83 (  73   !;   9   ?;  32   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_4,type,
    sQ3_eqProxy: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).

tff(f96,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f53,f76,f77,f78,f92,f95]) ).

tff(f95,plain,
    ~ spl4_8,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f94]) ).

tff(f94,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f75,f42]) ).

tff(f42,plain,
    ~ sQ3_eqProxy($o,$true,$false),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f5,f34]) ).

tff(f34,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0,X1: X0] :
      ( sQ3_eqProxy(X0,X1,X2)
    <=> ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    introduced(equality_proxy_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[sQ3_eqProxy])]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    $true != $false,
    introduced(fool_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f75,plain,
    ( ! [X3: $o] : sQ3_eqProxy($o,$true,(X3))
    | ~ spl4_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f74]) ).

tff(f74,plain,
    ( spl4_8
  <=> ! [X3: $o] : sQ3_eqProxy($o,$true,(X3)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_8])]) ).

tff(f92,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f91]) ).

tff(f91,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f90,f35]) ).

tff(f35,plain,
    ~ sQ3_eqProxy($i,sK1,sK2),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f25,f34]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    sK1 != sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK2 )
    & ( sK0 != sK2 )
    & in(sK2,setadjoin(sK0,setadjoin(sK1,emptyset)))
    & uniqinunit
    & setadjoinE ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f15,f19]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( X1 != X2 )
        & ( X0 != X2 )
        & in(X2,setadjoin(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset))) )
   => ( ( sK1 != sK2 )
      & ( sK0 != sK2 )
      & in(sK2,setadjoin(sK0,setadjoin(sK1,emptyset))) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( X1 != X2 )
        & ( X0 != X2 )
        & in(X2,setadjoin(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset))) )
    & uniqinunit
    & setadjoinE ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f14]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( X1 != X2 )
        & ( X0 != X2 )
        & in(X2,setadjoin(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset))) )
    & uniqinunit
    & setadjoinE ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ~ ( setadjoinE
     => ( uniqinunit
       => ! [X0,X1,X2] :
            ( in(X2,setadjoin(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset)))
           => ( ( X1 = X2 )
              | ( X0 = X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

tff(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( setadjoinE
     => ( uniqinunit
       => ! [X0,X2,X4] :
            ( in(X4,setadjoin(X0,setadjoin(X2,emptyset)))
           => ( ( X2 = X4 )
              | ( X0 = X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,conjecture,
    ( setadjoinE
   => ( uniqinunit
     => ! [X0,X2,X4] :
          ( in(X4,setadjoin(X0,setadjoin(X2,emptyset)))
         => ( ( X2 = X4 )
            | ( X0 = X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',upairsetE) ).

tff(f90,plain,
    ( sQ3_eqProxy($i,sK1,sK2)
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(forward_literal_rewriting,[],[f88,f45]) ).

tff(f45,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0,X1: X0] :
      ( sQ3_eqProxy(X0,X2,X1)
      | ~ sQ3_eqProxy(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_axiom,[],[f34]) ).

tff(f88,plain,
    ( sQ3_eqProxy($i,sK2,sK1)
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f87,f52]) ).

tff(f52,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ~ in(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset))
        | sQ3_eqProxy($i,X0,X1) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f51]) ).

tff(f51,plain,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( sQ3_eqProxy($i,X0,X1)
        | ~ in(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset)) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])]) ).

tff(f87,plain,
    ( in(sK2,setadjoin(sK1,emptyset))
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f86,f36]) ).

tff(f36,plain,
    ~ sQ3_eqProxy($i,sK0,sK2),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f24,f34]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    sK0 != sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f86,plain,
    ( in(sK2,setadjoin(sK1,emptyset))
    | sQ3_eqProxy($i,sK0,sK2)
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f72,f23]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    in(sK2,setadjoin(sK0,setadjoin(sK1,emptyset))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f72,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ~ in(X2,setadjoin(X0,X1))
        | in(X2,X1)
        | sQ3_eqProxy($i,X0,X2) )
    | ~ spl4_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f71]) ).

tff(f71,plain,
    ( spl4_7
  <=> ! [X2,X0,X1] :
        ( in(X2,X1)
        | ~ in(X2,setadjoin(X0,X1))
        | sQ3_eqProxy($i,X0,X2) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_7])]) ).

tff(f78,plain,
    spl4_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f22,f47]) ).

tff(f47,plain,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> uniqinunit ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    uniqinunit,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f77,plain,
    spl4_3,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f21,f55]) ).

tff(f55,plain,
    ( spl4_3
  <=> setadjoinE ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_3])]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    setadjoinE,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f76,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_3
    | spl4_7
    | spl4_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f41,f74,f71,f55]) ).

tff(f41,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $o,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( sQ3_eqProxy($o,$true,(X3))
      | in(X2,X1)
      | sQ3_eqProxy($i,X0,X2)
      | ~ in(X2,setadjoin(X0,X1))
      | ~ setadjoinE ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f27,f34]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $o,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true = (X3) )
      | in(X2,X1)
      | ( X0 = X2 )
      | ~ in(X2,setadjoin(X0,X1))
      | ~ setadjoinE ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ! [X3: $o] :
            ( ( $true = (X3) )
            | ( ( $true != (X3) )
              & in(X2,X1) )
            | ( ( $true != (X3) )
              & ( X0 = X2 ) ) )
        | ~ in(X2,setadjoin(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ setadjoinE ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ! [X3: $o] :
            ( ( $true = (X3) )
            | ( ( $true != (X3) )
              & in(X2,X1) )
            | ( ( $true != (X3) )
              & ( X0 = X2 ) ) )
        | ~ in(X2,setadjoin(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ setadjoinE ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ( setadjoinE
   => ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( in(X2,setadjoin(X0,X1))
       => ! [X3: $o] :
            ( ( ( X0 = X2 )
             => ( $true = (X3) ) )
           => ( ( in(X2,X1)
               => ( $true = (X3) ) )
             => ( $true = (X3) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ( setadjoinE
  <=> ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( in(X2,setadjoin(X0,X1))
       => ! [X3: $o] :
            ( ( ( X0 = X2 )
             => ( $true = (X3) ) )
           => ( ( in(X2,X1)
               => ( $true = (X3) ) )
             => ( $true = (X3) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ( setadjoinE
    = ( ! [X0,X1,X2] :
          ( in(X2,setadjoin(X0,X1))
         => ! [X3: $o] :
              ( ( ( X0 = X2 )
               => (X3) )
             => ( ( in(X2,X1)
                 => (X3) )
               => (X3) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,axiom,
    ( setadjoinE
    = ( ! [X0,X1,X2] :
          ( in(X2,setadjoin(X0,X1))
         => ! [X3: $o] :
              ( ( ( X0 = X2 )
               => (X3) )
             => ( ( in(X2,X1)
                 => (X3) )
               => (X3) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',setadjoinE) ).

tff(f53,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f37,f51,f47]) ).

tff(f37,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( sQ3_eqProxy($i,X0,X1)
      | ~ in(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset))
      | ~ uniqinunit ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f26,f34]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ in(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset))
      | ~ uniqinunit ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( X0 = X1 )
        | ~ in(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset)) )
    | ~ uniqinunit ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ( uniqinunit
   => ! [X0,X1] :
        ( in(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset))
       => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f10]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ( uniqinunit
  <=> ! [X0,X1] :
        ( in(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset))
       => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ( uniqinunit
    = ( ! [X0,X1] :
          ( in(X0,setadjoin(X1,emptyset))
         => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,axiom,
    ( uniqinunit
    = ( ! [X0,X2] :
          ( in(X0,setadjoin(X2,emptyset))
         => ( X0 = X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',uniqinunit) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : SEU531_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 17:12:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  This is a TX0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.75  % (20764)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20764)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (20764)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20764)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20764)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  % (20764)Memory used [KB]: 956
% 0.56/0.75  % (20764)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.56/0.75  % (20764)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20757)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20759)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20760)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20761)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20764)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20764)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20762)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20763)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20758)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20760)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (20760)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20760)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20760)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  % (20760)Memory used [KB]: 959
% 0.56/0.75  % (20760)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.75  % (20760)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20762)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (20762)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20762)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20761)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (20761)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20761)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20761)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  % (20761)Memory used [KB]: 990
% 0.56/0.75  % (20761)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.75  % (20761)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20759)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.75  % (20757)First to succeed.
% 0.56/0.75  % (20762)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  % (20762)Memory used [KB]: 974
% 0.56/0.75  % (20762)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.75  % (20760)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20760)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20762)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20763)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.75  % (20761)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20761)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20762)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20762)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20766)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20758)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.75  % (20757)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-20598"
% 0.56/0.75  % (20757)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.56/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.75  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.75  % (20757)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (20757)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20757)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  % (20757)Memory used [KB]: 994
% 0.56/0.75  % (20757)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.56/0.75  % (20757)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.56/0.75  % (20598)Success in time 0.385 s
% 0.56/0.75  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------