TSTP Solution File: SEU470^1 by Nitpick---2016
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Nitpick---2016
% Problem : SEU470^1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% Computer : n132.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 14:23:28 EST 2017
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 30.29s
% Output : FiniteModel 30.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU470^1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n132.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Sun Jan 15 22:22:03 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 30.29/11.73 Nitpicking formula...
% 30.29/11.73 Timestamp: 22:22:11
% 30.29/11.73 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be
% 30.29/11.73 able to skip some scopes
% 30.29/11.73 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 30.29/11.73 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 30.29/11.73 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 30.29/11.73 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 30.29/11.73 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 30.29/11.73 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 30.29/11.73 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 30.29/11.73 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 30.29/11.73 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 30.29/11.73 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3:
% 30.29/11.73
% 30.29/11.73 Skolem constants:
% 30.29/11.73 R = (\<lambda>x. _)
% 30.29/11.73 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True, i3 := True),
% 30.29/11.73 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True, i3 := False),
% 30.29/11.73 i3 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False, i3 := True))
% 30.29/11.73 ??.bnd_symm.X = i1
% 30.29/11.73 ??.bnd_symm.Y = i1
% 30.29/11.73 ??.bnd_tc.S =
% 30.29/11.73 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 30.29/11.73 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True, i3 := True),
% 30.29/11.73 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True, i3 := True),
% 30.29/11.73 i3 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False, i3 := True))
% 30.29/11.73 ??.bnd_tc.S =
% 30.29/11.73 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 30.29/11.73 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True, i3 := True),
% 30.29/11.73 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True, i3 := False),
% 30.29/11.73 i3 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True, i3 := True))
% 30.29/11.73 ??.bnd_tc.S =
% 30.29/11.73 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 30.29/11.73 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False, i3 := False),
% 30.29/11.73 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True, i3 := False),
% 30.29/11.73 i3 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False, i3 := True))
% 30.29/11.73 ??.bnd_tc.S =
% 30.29/11.73 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 30.29/11.73 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False, i3 := False),
% 30.29/11.73 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True, i3 := False),
% 30.29/11.73 i3 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False, i3 := True))
% 30.29/11.73 ??.bnd_trans.X = i2
% 30.29/11.73 ??.bnd_trans.Y = i1
% 30.29/11.73 ??.bnd_trans.Z = i3
% 30.29/11.73 % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 30.29/11.73 Total time: 3.2 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------