TSTP Solution File: SEU435+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SEU435+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:06:15 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.48s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X0,X1))))
=> ! [X3,X4,X5] :
( m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
=> m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4))) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t36_relset_2) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X0,X1))))
=> ! [X3,X4,X5] :
( m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
=> m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4))) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f43,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( ( m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X0,X1)))) )
=> m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s8_domain_1__e1_46__relset_2) ).
fof(f61,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ? [X3,X4,X5] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4)))
& m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) )
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X0,X1)))) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f83,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X0,X1)))) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).
fof(f84,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X0,X1)))) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f83]) ).
fof(f96,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ? [X3,X4,X5] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4)))
& m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) )
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X0,X1)))) )
=> ( ? [X5,X4,X3] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,X3,X4,X5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4)))
& m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) )
& m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(sK0,sK1)))) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f97,plain,
( ? [X5,X4,X3] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,X3,X4,X5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4)))
& m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) )
=> ( ~ m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK4)))
& m1_subset_1(sK5,k1_zfmisc_1(sK3)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK4)))
& m1_subset_1(sK5,k1_zfmisc_1(sK3))
& m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(sK0,sK1)))) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5])],[f61,f97,f96]) ).
fof(f127,plain,
m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(sK0,sK1)))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).
fof(f128,plain,
m1_subset_1(sK5,k1_zfmisc_1(sK3)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).
fof(f129,plain,
~ m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK4))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).
fof(f174,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X0,X1)))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK4))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f129]) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(sK5,k1_zfmisc_1(sK3)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f128]) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(sK0,sK1)))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).
cnf(c_96,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(X0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2))))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X4))
| m1_subset_1(a_6_0_relset_2(X1,X2,X0,X4,X5,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X5))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f174]) ).
cnf(c_1110,plain,
k2_zfmisc_1(sK0,sK1) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_1111,plain,
k1_zfmisc_1(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_1112,plain,
k1_zfmisc_1(sP1_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_1113,plain,
k1_zfmisc_1(sK3) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_1114,plain,
a_6_0_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_1115,plain,
k1_zfmisc_1(sK4) = sP5_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_1116,plain,
k1_zfmisc_1(sP5_iProver_def) = sP6_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_1117,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(sK2,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_1110,c_1111,c_1112]) ).
cnf(c_1118,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(sK5,sP3_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_1113]) ).
cnf(c_1119,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(sP4_iProver_def,sP6_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_1115,c_1116,c_1114]) ).
cnf(c_2704,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(sK0,sK1))))
| ~ m1_subset_1(sK5,k1_zfmisc_1(sK3))
| m1_subset_1(sP4_iProver_def,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK4))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1114,c_96]) ).
cnf(c_2713,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(sK2,sP2_iProver_def)
| ~ m1_subset_1(sK5,sP3_iProver_def)
| m1_subset_1(sP4_iProver_def,sP6_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2704,c_1110,c_1111,c_1112,c_1113,c_1115,c_1116]) ).
cnf(c_2714,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2713,c_1119,c_1118,c_1117]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SEU435+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 18:21:30 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.48/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 ------ iProver source info
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.48/1.16 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.48/1.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 ------ Parsing...
% 0.48/1.16 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 11 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 5 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.48/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 0.48/1.16 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 clauses 49
% 0.48/1.16 conjectures 3
% 0.48/1.16 EPR 12
% 0.48/1.16 Horn 45
% 0.48/1.16 unary 23
% 0.48/1.16 binary 11
% 0.48/1.16 lits 95
% 0.48/1.16 lits eq 16
% 0.48/1.16 fd_pure 0
% 0.48/1.16 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.48/1.16 fd_cond 1
% 0.48/1.16 fd_pseudo_cond 3
% 0.48/1.16 AC symbols 0
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 ------
% 0.48/1.16 Current options:
% 0.48/1.16 ------
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.48/1.16
% 0.48/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------