TSTP Solution File: SEU429+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEU429+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 09:23:47 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 0.70s
% Output   : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   6 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  197 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (  10 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   69 (  27   ~;  12   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :  136 ( 136 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   1   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (  10 usr;   5 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (  24   !;  16   ?;   5   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_12,type,
    sQ11_eqProxy: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).

tff(f151,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f150,f95]) ).

tff(f95,plain,
    ~ v1_xboole_0(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).

tff(f77,plain,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1)))
    & m2_relset_1(sK3,sK0,sK1)
    & m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0)))
    & ~ v1_xboole_0(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f57,f76,f75,f74]) ).

tff(f74,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1,X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
                & m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1) )
            & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0))) )
        & ~ v1_xboole_0(X0) )
   => ( ? [X2,X1] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
              & m2_relset_1(X3,sK0,X1) )
          & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0))) )
      & ~ v1_xboole_0(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f75,plain,
    ( ? [X2,X1] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
            & m2_relset_1(X3,sK0,X1) )
        & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0))) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1)))
          & m2_relset_1(X3,sK0,sK1) )
      & m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0))) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f76,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1)))
        & m2_relset_1(X3,sK0,sK1) )
   => ( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1)))
      & m2_relset_1(sK3,sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f57,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1,X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
              & m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1) )
          & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0))) )
      & ~ v1_xboole_0(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X0)
       => ! [X1,X2] :
            ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
           => ! [X3] :
                ( m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
               => m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X0)
     => ! [X1,X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
             => m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RdsbM86lmm/Vampire---4.8_31260',t28_relset_2) ).

tff(f150,plain,
    v1_xboole_0(sK0),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f149,f96]) ).

tff(f96,plain,
    m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).

tff(f149,plain,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0)))
    | v1_xboole_0(sK0) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f146,f97]) ).

tff(f97,plain,
    m2_relset_1(sK3,sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).

tff(f146,plain,
    ( ~ m2_relset_1(sK3,sK0,sK1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(sK2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK0)))
    | v1_xboole_0(sK0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f113,f98]) ).

tff(f98,plain,
    ~ m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(sK1))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).

tff(f113,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
      | ~ m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
      | v1_xboole_0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).

tff(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
      | ~ m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
      | v1_xboole_0(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f69]) ).

tff(f69,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
      | ~ m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
      | v1_xboole_0(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

tff(f43,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( m2_relset_1(X3,X0,X1)
        & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X0)))
        & ~ v1_xboole_0(X0) )
     => m1_subset_1(a_4_1_relset_2(X0,X1,X2,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RdsbM86lmm/Vampire---4.8_31260',s8_domain_1__e1_38__relset_2) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.12  % Problem    : SEU429+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.09/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 11:44:29 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.35  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.13/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RdsbM86lmm/Vampire---4.8_31260
% 0.48/0.69  % (31369)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.48/0.69  % (31370)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.48/0.69  % (31373)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.48/0.69  % (31372)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.48/0.69  % (31371)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.48/0.69  % (31375)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.48/0.69  % (31374)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.48/0.69  % (31376)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.48/0.69  % (31369)First to succeed.
% 0.48/0.69  % (31369)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-31368"
% 0.48/0.69  % (31376)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.48/0.69  % (31374)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.48/0.69  % (31372)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.48/0.69  % (31373)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.48/0.70  % (31369)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.48/0.70  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.48/0.70  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.70  % (31369)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.70  % (31369)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.48/0.70  % (31369)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.48/0.70  
% 0.48/0.70  % (31369)Memory used [KB]: 1078
% 0.48/0.70  % (31369)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.48/0.70  % (31369)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.48/0.70  % (31368)Success in time 0.345 s
% 0.48/0.70  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------