TSTP Solution File: SEU427+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU427+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:20:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.22s 9.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 28 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 77 ( 42 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 60 ( 23 ~; 19 |; 6 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 64 ( 1 sgn 38 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t26_relset_2,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
=> ! [X4] :
( m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
=> ! [X5] :
( m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
=> ( k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),X2,k6_relset_2(X2,X1,X5),k3_pua2mss1(X3)) = k1_xboole_0
=> k8_relset_2(X1,X2,k4_subset_1(X1,X3,X4),X5) = k8_relset_2(X1,X2,X4,X5) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t26_relset_2) ).
fof(t23_relset_2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
=> ! [X4] :
( m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
=> ( k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),X2,k6_relset_2(X2,X1,X4),k3_pua2mss1(X3)) = k1_xboole_0
<=> X3 = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t23_relset_2) ).
fof(d2_pua2mss1,axiom,
! [X1] : k3_pua2mss1(X1) = k8_eqrel_1(X1,k6_partfun1(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+441.ax',d2_pua2mss1) ).
fof(redefinition_k4_subset_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
& m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) )
=> k4_subset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k2_xboole_0(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',redefinition_k4_subset_1) ).
fof(t93_zfmisc_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,X2)) = k2_xboole_0(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+6.ax',t93_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : k2_xboole_0(X1,X2) = k2_xboole_0(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).
fof(t1_boole,axiom,
! [X1] : k2_xboole_0(X1,k1_xboole_0) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+3.ax',t1_boole) ).
fof(t4_subset_1,axiom,
! [X1] : m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',t4_subset_1) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
=> ! [X4] :
( m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
=> ! [X5] :
( m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
=> ( k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X1),X2,k6_relset_2(X2,X1,X5),k3_pua2mss1(X3)) = k1_xboole_0
=> k8_relset_2(X1,X2,k4_subset_1(X1,X3,X4),X5) = k8_relset_2(X1,X2,X4,X5) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t26_relset_2]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X5),X6,k6_relset_2(X6,X5,X8),k3_pua2mss1(X7)) != k1_xboole_0
| X7 = k1_xboole_0
| ~ m1_subset_1(X8,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X5,X6)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X7,k1_zfmisc_1(X5)) )
& ( X7 != k1_xboole_0
| k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X5),X6,k6_relset_2(X6,X5,X8),k3_pua2mss1(X7)) = k1_xboole_0
| ~ m1_subset_1(X8,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X5,X6)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X7,k1_zfmisc_1(X5)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t23_relset_2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X2] : k3_pua2mss1(X2) = k8_eqrel_1(X2,k6_partfun1(X2)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d2_pua2mss1]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
& m1_subset_1(esk4_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
& m1_subset_1(esk5_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
& k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),esk2_0,k6_relset_2(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk5_0),k3_pua2mss1(esk3_0)) = k1_xboole_0
& k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,k4_subset_1(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0,esk5_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X4))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X6,k1_zfmisc_1(X4))
| k4_subset_1(X4,X5,X6) = k2_xboole_0(X5,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k4_subset_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X3,X4] : k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X3,X4)) = k2_xboole_0(X3,X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t93_zfmisc_1]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X3,X4] : k2_xboole_0(X3,X4) = k2_xboole_0(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X2] : k2_xboole_0(X2,k1_xboole_0) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t1_boole]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X4)))
| k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X2),X4,k6_relset_2(X4,X2,X3),k3_pua2mss1(X1)) != k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
k3_pua2mss1(X1) = k8_eqrel_1(X1,k6_partfun1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),esk2_0,k6_relset_2(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk5_0),k3_pua2mss1(esk3_0)) = k1_xboole_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( k4_subset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k2_xboole_0(X2,X3)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,X2)) = k2_xboole_0(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
k2_xboole_0(X1,X2) = k2_xboole_0(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
k2_xboole_0(X1,k1_xboole_0) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(X2),X4,k6_relset_2(X4,X2,X3),k8_eqrel_1(X1,k6_partfun1(X1))) != k1_xboole_0
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X4))) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
k4_relset_2(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),esk2_0,k6_relset_2(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk5_0),k8_eqrel_1(esk3_0,k6_partfun1(esk3_0))) = k1_xboole_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk5_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( k4_subset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X2,X3))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk4_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X2] : m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t4_subset_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,X2)) = k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X2,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_20]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,k1_xboole_0)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,k4_subset_1(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0,esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 = k1_xboole_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( k4_subset_1(esk1_0,X1,esk4_0) = k3_tarski(k2_tarski(X1,esk4_0))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
k3_tarski(k2_tarski(k1_xboole_0,X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,k4_subset_1(esk1_0,k1_xboole_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != k8_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0,esk5_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
k4_subset_1(esk1_0,k1_xboole_0,esk4_0) = esk4_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SEU427+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 02:32:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 4.22/9.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 4.22/9.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 4.22/9.41 # Preprocessing time : 3.169 s
% 4.22/9.41
% 4.22/9.41 # Proof found!
% 4.22/9.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.22/9.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.22/9.41 # Proof object total steps : 40
% 4.22/9.41 # Proof object clause steps : 23
% 4.22/9.41 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 4.22/9.41 # Proof object conjectures : 14
% 4.22/9.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 11
% 4.22/9.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 4.22/9.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 12
% 4.22/9.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 4.22/9.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 4.22/9.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 13
% 4.22/9.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.22/9.41 # Parsed axioms : 71108
% 4.22/9.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 70607
% 4.22/9.41 # Initial clauses : 1013
% 4.22/9.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 10
% 4.22/9.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1003
% 4.22/9.41 # Processed clauses : 2208
% 4.22/9.41 # ...of these trivial : 49
% 4.22/9.41 # ...subsumed : 162
% 4.22/9.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 1997
% 4.22/9.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 40
% 4.22/9.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.22/9.41 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 4.22/9.41 # Backward-rewritten : 542
% 4.22/9.41 # Generated clauses : 52084
% 4.22/9.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 51798
% 4.22/9.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 99
% 4.22/9.41 # Paramodulations : 51981
% 4.22/9.41 # Factorizations : 8
% 4.22/9.41 # Equation resolutions : 79
% 4.22/9.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 1428
% 4.22/9.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 262
% 4.22/9.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 4.22/9.41 # Negative unit clauses : 67
% 4.22/9.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 1095
% 4.22/9.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14453
% 4.22/9.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 50618
% 4.22/9.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.22/9.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 564
% 4.22/9.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 482474
% 4.22/9.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 54569
% 4.22/9.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 179
% 4.22/9.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32865
% 4.22/9.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 12
% 4.22/9.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 52813
% 4.22/9.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 213
% 4.22/9.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.22/9.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 4.22/9.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7735174
% 4.22/9.41
% 4.22/9.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.22/9.41 # User time : 4.640 s
% 4.22/9.41 # System time : 0.164 s
% 4.22/9.41 # Total time : 4.804 s
% 4.22/9.41 # Maximum resident set size: 231948 pages
% 4.24/27.37 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.24/27.38 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.24/27.38 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.24/27.40 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.40 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/27.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/27.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/27.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/27.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/27.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/27.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/27.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/27.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/27.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/27.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.24/27.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.24/27.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/27.50 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------