TSTP Solution File: SEU385+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SEU385+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:29:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.02s 300.20s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SEU385+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 16:03:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.36 Sun Jun 19 16:03:18 2022
% 0.18/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 2866.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=14.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(A)|empty(B)| -relation_of2(C,A,B)| -function(C)| -quasi_total(C,A,B)|v1_partfun1(C,A,B).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -one_sorted_str(A)|empty_carrier(B)| -net_str(B,A)|function(the_mapping(A,B)).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 48 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -one_sorted_str(A)|empty_carrier(B)| -net_str(B,A)|quasi_total(the_mapping(A,B),the_carrier(B),the_carrier(A)).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -one_sorted_str(A)|empty_carrier(B)| -directed_relstr(B)| -net_str(B,A)| -element(C,the_carrier(B))|strict_net_str(netstr_restr_to_element(A,B,C),A).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -one_sorted_str(A)|empty(B)| -relation_of2(C,B,B)| -function(D)| -quasi_total(D,B,the_carrier(A))| -relation_of2(D,B,the_carrier(A))|strict_net_str(net_str_of(A,B,C,D),A).
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 185 during input processing: 0 [copy,185,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.36 185 back subsumes 127.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.76/0.97 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.76/0.97 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.76/0.97 number of clauses in intial UL: 138
% 0.76/0.97 number of clauses initially in problem: 177
% 0.76/0.97 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 77
% 0.76/0.97 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 80
% 0.76/0.97 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.76/0.97 absolute distinct symbol count: 65
% 0.76/0.97 distinct predicate count: 23
% 0.76/0.97 distinct function count: 27
% 0.76/0.97 distinct constant count: 15
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.02/300.20 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------