TSTP Solution File: SEU355+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU355+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:41:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.74s 3.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 8 unt; 6 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 2 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_279,plain,
( X1 != empty_set
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rip0y9ij/lgb.p',i_0_279) ).
cnf(i_0_487,plain,
( relstr_element_smaller(X1,X2,X3)
| in(esk98_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ rel_str(X1)
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rip0y9ij/lgb.p',i_0_487) ).
cnf(i_0_2665,negated_conjecture,
element(esk436_0,the_carrier(esk435_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rip0y9ij/lgb.p',i_0_2665) ).
cnf(i_0_2666,negated_conjecture,
rel_str(esk435_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rip0y9ij/lgb.p',i_0_2666) ).
cnf(i_0_519,plain,
( relstr_set_smaller(X1,X2,X3)
| in(esk109_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ rel_str(X1)
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rip0y9ij/lgb.p',i_0_519) ).
cnf(i_0_2664,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relstr_element_smaller(esk435_0,empty_set,esk436_0)
| ~ relstr_set_smaller(esk435_0,empty_set,esk436_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rip0y9ij/lgb.p',i_0_2664) ).
cnf(c_0_2673,plain,
( X1 != empty_set
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
i_0_279 ).
cnf(c_0_2674,plain,
( relstr_element_smaller(X1,X2,X3)
| in(esk98_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ rel_str(X1)
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1)) ),
i_0_487 ).
cnf(c_0_2675,negated_conjecture,
element(esk436_0,the_carrier(esk435_0)),
i_0_2665 ).
cnf(c_0_2676,negated_conjecture,
rel_str(esk435_0),
i_0_2666 ).
cnf(c_0_2677,plain,
~ in(X1,empty_set),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_2673]) ).
cnf(c_0_2678,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk98_3(esk435_0,X1,esk436_0),X1)
| relstr_element_smaller(esk435_0,X1,esk436_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2674,c_0_2675]),c_0_2676])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2679,plain,
( relstr_set_smaller(X1,X2,X3)
| in(esk109_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ rel_str(X1)
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1)) ),
i_0_519 ).
cnf(c_0_2680,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relstr_element_smaller(esk435_0,empty_set,esk436_0)
| ~ relstr_set_smaller(esk435_0,empty_set,esk436_0) ),
i_0_2664 ).
cnf(c_0_2681,plain,
relstr_element_smaller(esk435_0,empty_set,esk436_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2677,c_0_2678]) ).
cnf(c_0_2682,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk109_3(esk435_0,X1,esk436_0),X1)
| relstr_set_smaller(esk435_0,X1,esk436_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2679,c_0_2675]),c_0_2676])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2683,negated_conjecture,
~ relstr_set_smaller(esk435_0,empty_set,esk436_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2680,c_0_2681])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2684,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2677,c_0_2682]),c_0_2683]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU355+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 15:10:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 5.74/3.19 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 5.74/3.19 # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.74/3.19 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 5.74/3.19 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.74/3.19 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 5.74/3.19 #
% 5.74/3.19 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 5.74/3.19 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.74/3.19
% 5.74/3.19 # Proof found!
% 5.74/3.19 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.74/3.19 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.74/3.19 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.74/3.19
% 5.74/3.19 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.74/3.19 # User time : 0.043 s
% 5.74/3.19 # System time : 0.007 s
% 5.74/3.19 # Total time : 0.050 s
% 5.74/3.19 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 5.74/3.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------