TSTP Solution File: SEU326+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU326+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:40:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 14.41s 5.00s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 14.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (   9 unt;   6 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   60 (  21 equ;  33 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_216,plain,
    ( X1 != empty_set
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k2u4sxw6/lgb.p',i_0_216) ).

cnf(i_0_415,plain,
    ( in(subset_complement(X1,X2),X3)
    | X4 != complements_of_subsets(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X2,X4)
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X1))
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(powerset(X1)))
    | ~ element(X4,powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k2u4sxw6/lgb.p',i_0_415) ).

cnf(i_0_1888,plain,
    ( element(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k2u4sxw6/lgb.p',i_0_1888) ).

cnf(i_0_447,plain,
    ( element(complements_of_subsets(X1,X2),powerset(powerset(X1)))
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k2u4sxw6/lgb.p',i_0_447) ).

cnf(i_0_657,lemma,
    ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | in(esk116_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k2u4sxw6/lgb.p',i_0_657) ).

cnf(i_0_1879,lemma,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | complements_of_subsets(X2,X1) != empty_set
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(powerset(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k2u4sxw6/lgb.p',i_0_1879) ).

cnf(i_0_1685,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk312_0 = empty_set
    | complements_of_subsets(esk311_0,esk312_0) = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k2u4sxw6/lgb.p',i_0_1685) ).

cnf(i_0_1689,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk312_0,powerset(powerset(esk311_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k2u4sxw6/lgb.p',i_0_1689) ).

cnf(i_0_1688,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk312_0 != empty_set
    | complements_of_subsets(esk311_0,esk312_0) != empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k2u4sxw6/lgb.p',i_0_1688) ).

cnf(i_0_215,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(esk40_1(X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k2u4sxw6/lgb.p',i_0_215) ).

cnf(c_0_1899,plain,
    ( X1 != empty_set
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_216 ).

cnf(c_0_1900,plain,
    ( in(subset_complement(X1,X2),X3)
    | X4 != complements_of_subsets(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X2,X4)
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X1))
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(powerset(X1)))
    | ~ element(X4,powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    i_0_415 ).

cnf(c_0_1901,plain,
    ( element(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(X2)) ),
    i_0_1888 ).

cnf(c_0_1902,plain,
    ( element(complements_of_subsets(X1,X2),powerset(powerset(X1)))
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    i_0_447 ).

cnf(c_0_1903,plain,
    ~ in(X1,empty_set),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_1899]) ).

cnf(c_0_1904,lemma,
    ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | in(esk116_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    i_0_657 ).

cnf(c_0_1905,lemma,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | complements_of_subsets(X2,X1) != empty_set
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(powerset(X2))) ),
    i_0_1879 ).

cnf(c_0_1906,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk312_0 = empty_set
    | complements_of_subsets(esk311_0,esk312_0) = empty_set ),
    i_0_1685 ).

cnf(c_0_1907,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk312_0,powerset(powerset(esk311_0))),
    i_0_1689 ).

cnf(c_0_1908,plain,
    ( in(subset_complement(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ in(X2,complements_of_subsets(X1,X3))
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_1900,c_0_1901])]),c_0_1902]) ).

cnf(c_0_1909,plain,
    element(empty_set,powerset(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1903,c_0_1904]) ).

cnf(c_0_1910,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk312_0 != empty_set
    | complements_of_subsets(esk311_0,esk312_0) != empty_set ),
    i_0_1688 ).

cnf(c_0_1911,negated_conjecture,
    esk312_0 = empty_set,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1905,c_0_1906]),c_0_1907])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1912,plain,
    ~ in(X1,complements_of_subsets(X2,empty_set)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1903,c_0_1908]),c_0_1909])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1913,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(esk40_1(X1),X1) ),
    i_0_215 ).

cnf(c_0_1914,negated_conjecture,
    complements_of_subsets(esk311_0,empty_set) != empty_set,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1910,c_0_1911]),c_0_1911])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1915,plain,
    complements_of_subsets(X1,empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1912,c_0_1913]) ).

cnf(c_0_1916,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1914,c_0_1915])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU326+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 08:20:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.47  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.50  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 14.41/5.00  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 14.41/5.00  # No SInE strategy applied
% 14.41/5.00  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 14.41/5.00  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 14.41/5.00  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 14.41/5.00  #
% 14.41/5.00  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 14.41/5.00  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 14.41/5.00  
% 14.41/5.00  # Proof found!
% 14.41/5.00  # SZS status Theorem
% 14.41/5.00  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 14.41/5.00  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 14.41/5.00  
% 14.41/5.00  # -------------------------------------------------
% 14.41/5.00  # User time                : 0.038 s
% 14.41/5.00  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 14.41/5.00  # Total time               : 0.043 s
% 14.41/5.00  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 14.41/5.00  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------