TSTP Solution File: SEU306+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEU306+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 09:22:08 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.70s 0.92s
% Output : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 5 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 63 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 11 ~; 3 |; 4 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 36 ( 36 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 9 !; 2 ?; 6 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_16,type,
sQ2_eqProxy:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).
tff(f61,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f60,f51]) ).
tff(f51,plain,
one_sorted_str(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).
tff(f48,plain,
( ( cast_as_carrier_subset(sK0) != the_carrier(sK0) )
& one_sorted_str(sK0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f45,f47]) ).
tff(f47,plain,
( ? [X0] :
( ( cast_as_carrier_subset(X0) != the_carrier(X0) )
& one_sorted_str(X0) )
=> ( ( cast_as_carrier_subset(sK0) != the_carrier(sK0) )
& one_sorted_str(sK0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f45,plain,
? [X0] :
( ( cast_as_carrier_subset(X0) != the_carrier(X0) )
& one_sorted_str(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).
tff(f41,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( one_sorted_str(X0)
=> ( cast_as_carrier_subset(X0) = the_carrier(X0) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f40]) ).
tff(f40,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( one_sorted_str(X0)
=> ( cast_as_carrier_subset(X0) = the_carrier(X0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BZyMwRTbGP/Vampire---4.8_11854',t12_pre_topc) ).
tff(f60,plain,
~ one_sorted_str(sK0),
inference(resolution,[],[f57,f56]) ).
tff(f56,plain,
~ sQ2_eqProxy($i,cast_as_carrier_subset(sK0),the_carrier(sK0)),
inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f52,f55]) ).
tff(f55,plain,
! [X0: $tType,X2: X0,X1: X0] :
( sQ2_eqProxy(X0,X1,X2)
<=> ( X1 = X2 ) ),
introduced(equality_proxy_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[sQ2_eqProxy])]) ).
tff(f52,plain,
cast_as_carrier_subset(sK0) != the_carrier(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).
tff(f57,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( sQ2_eqProxy($i,cast_as_carrier_subset(X0),the_carrier(X0))
| ~ one_sorted_str(X0) ),
inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f53,f55]) ).
tff(f53,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( cast_as_carrier_subset(X0) = the_carrier(X0) )
| ~ one_sorted_str(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).
tff(f46,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( cast_as_carrier_subset(X0) = the_carrier(X0) )
| ~ one_sorted_str(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).
tff(f39,axiom,
! [X0] :
( one_sorted_str(X0)
=> ( cast_as_carrier_subset(X0) = the_carrier(X0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BZyMwRTbGP/Vampire---4.8_11854',d3_pre_topc) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SEU306+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 11:33:33 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.36 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.16/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BZyMwRTbGP/Vampire---4.8_11854
% 0.70/0.92 % (12099)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.70/0.92 % (12098)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.70/0.92 % (12097)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.70/0.92 % (12100)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.70/0.92 % (12101)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.70/0.92 % (12102)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.70/0.92 % (12103)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.70/0.92 % (12104)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.70/0.92 % (12100)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92 % (12097)First to succeed.
% 0.70/0.92 % (12102)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92 % (12097)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-12070"
% 0.70/0.92 % (12101)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92 % (12099)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92 % (12104)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92 % (12103)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92 % (12098)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92 % (12097)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.70/0.92 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.70/0.92 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.70/0.92 % (12097)------------------------------
% 0.70/0.92 % (12097)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.70/0.92 % (12097)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.70/0.92
% 0.70/0.92 % (12097)Memory used [KB]: 967
% 0.70/0.92 % (12097)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.70/0.92 % (12097)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.70/0.92 % (12070)Success in time 0.552 s
% 0.70/0.92 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------