TSTP Solution File: SEU305+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU305+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:40:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.87s 2.95s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.87s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 18 unt; 6 nHn; 31 RR)
% Number of literals : 72 ( 16 equ; 39 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_190,plain,
( join(X1,X2,X3) = X3
| empty_carrier(X1)
| ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
| ~ below(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-koaa4tfm/lgb.p',i_0_190) ).
cnf(i_0_1494,negated_conjecture,
element(esk290_0,the_carrier(esk289_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-koaa4tfm/lgb.p',i_0_1494) ).
cnf(i_0_1495,negated_conjecture,
join_semilatt_str(esk289_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-koaa4tfm/lgb.p',i_0_1495) ).
cnf(i_0_1497,negated_conjecture,
~ empty_carrier(esk289_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-koaa4tfm/lgb.p',i_0_1497) ).
cnf(i_0_584,plain,
( join_commut(X1,X2,X3) = join(X1,X2,X3)
| empty_carrier(X1)
| ~ join_commutative(X1)
| ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-koaa4tfm/lgb.p',i_0_584) ).
cnf(i_0_1496,negated_conjecture,
join_commutative(esk289_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-koaa4tfm/lgb.p',i_0_1496) ).
cnf(i_0_1493,negated_conjecture,
element(esk291_0,the_carrier(esk289_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-koaa4tfm/lgb.p',i_0_1493) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( join_commut(X1,X2,X3) = join_commut(X1,X3,X2)
| empty_carrier(X1)
| ~ join_commutative(X1)
| ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-koaa4tfm/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_1491,negated_conjecture,
below(esk289_0,esk291_0,esk290_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-koaa4tfm/lgb.p',i_0_1491) ).
cnf(i_0_1492,negated_conjecture,
below(esk289_0,esk290_0,esk291_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-koaa4tfm/lgb.p',i_0_1492) ).
cnf(i_0_1490,negated_conjecture,
esk291_0 != esk290_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-koaa4tfm/lgb.p',i_0_1490) ).
cnf(c_0_1509,plain,
( join(X1,X2,X3) = X3
| empty_carrier(X1)
| ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
| ~ below(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1)) ),
i_0_190 ).
cnf(c_0_1510,negated_conjecture,
element(esk290_0,the_carrier(esk289_0)),
i_0_1494 ).
cnf(c_0_1511,negated_conjecture,
join_semilatt_str(esk289_0),
i_0_1495 ).
cnf(c_0_1512,negated_conjecture,
~ empty_carrier(esk289_0),
i_0_1497 ).
cnf(c_0_1513,plain,
( join_commut(X1,X2,X3) = join(X1,X2,X3)
| empty_carrier(X1)
| ~ join_commutative(X1)
| ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1)) ),
i_0_584 ).
cnf(c_0_1514,negated_conjecture,
join_commutative(esk289_0),
i_0_1496 ).
cnf(c_0_1515,negated_conjecture,
element(esk291_0,the_carrier(esk289_0)),
i_0_1493 ).
cnf(c_0_1516,negated_conjecture,
( join(esk289_0,X1,esk290_0) = esk290_0
| ~ below(esk289_0,X1,esk290_0)
| ~ element(X1,the_carrier(esk289_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1509,c_0_1510]),c_0_1511])]),c_0_1512]) ).
cnf(c_0_1517,negated_conjecture,
( join(esk289_0,X1,esk290_0) = join_commut(esk289_0,X1,esk290_0)
| ~ element(X1,the_carrier(esk289_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1513,c_0_1510]),c_0_1514]),c_0_1511])]),c_0_1512]) ).
cnf(c_0_1518,plain,
( join_commut(X1,X2,X3) = join_commut(X1,X3,X2)
| empty_carrier(X1)
| ~ join_commutative(X1)
| ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1)) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_1519,negated_conjecture,
( join(esk289_0,X1,esk291_0) = esk291_0
| ~ below(esk289_0,X1,esk291_0)
| ~ element(X1,the_carrier(esk289_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1509,c_0_1515]),c_0_1511])]),c_0_1512]) ).
cnf(c_0_1520,negated_conjecture,
( join(esk289_0,X1,esk291_0) = join_commut(esk289_0,X1,esk291_0)
| ~ element(X1,the_carrier(esk289_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1513,c_0_1515]),c_0_1514]),c_0_1511])]),c_0_1512]) ).
cnf(c_0_1521,negated_conjecture,
( join_commut(esk289_0,X1,esk290_0) = esk290_0
| ~ below(esk289_0,X1,esk290_0)
| ~ element(X1,the_carrier(esk289_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1516,c_0_1517]) ).
cnf(c_0_1522,negated_conjecture,
( join_commut(esk289_0,X1,esk291_0) = join_commut(esk289_0,esk291_0,X1)
| ~ element(X1,the_carrier(esk289_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1518,c_0_1515]),c_0_1514]),c_0_1511])]),c_0_1512]) ).
cnf(c_0_1523,negated_conjecture,
below(esk289_0,esk291_0,esk290_0),
i_0_1491 ).
cnf(c_0_1524,negated_conjecture,
( join_commut(esk289_0,X1,esk291_0) = esk291_0
| ~ below(esk289_0,X1,esk291_0)
| ~ element(X1,the_carrier(esk289_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1519,c_0_1520]) ).
cnf(c_0_1525,negated_conjecture,
join_commut(esk289_0,esk290_0,esk291_0) = esk290_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1521,c_0_1522]),c_0_1523]),c_0_1515]),c_0_1510])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1526,negated_conjecture,
below(esk289_0,esk290_0,esk291_0),
i_0_1492 ).
cnf(c_0_1527,negated_conjecture,
esk291_0 != esk290_0,
i_0_1490 ).
cnf(c_0_1528,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1524,c_0_1525]),c_0_1526]),c_0_1510])]),c_0_1527]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU305+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 12:20:49 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.87/2.95 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.87/2.95 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.87/2.95 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.87/2.95 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.87/2.95 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.87/2.95 #
% 8.87/2.95 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 8.87/2.95 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.87/2.95
% 8.87/2.95 # Proof found!
% 8.87/2.95 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.87/2.95 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.87/2.95 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.87/2.95
% 8.87/2.95 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.87/2.95 # User time : 0.020 s
% 8.87/2.95 # System time : 0.004 s
% 8.87/2.95 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 8.87/2.95 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.87/2.95
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------