TSTP Solution File: SEU303+2 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SEU303+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 03:25:27 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 14.42s
% Output : Solution 14.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23150/SEU303+2.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23150/SEU303+2.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23150/SEU303+2.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 23352
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% PrfWatch: 1.96 CPU 2.03 WC
% PrfWatch: 3.95 CPU 4.03 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.189 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% PrfWatch: 5.94 CPU 6.04 WC
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(((relation(X1)&function(X1))&finite(X2))=>finite(relation_image(X1,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', fc13_finset_1)).
% fof(20, axiom,![X1]:(relation(X1)=>relation_image(X1,relation_dom(X1))=relation_rng(X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t146_relat_1)).
% fof(420, conjecture,![X1]:((relation(X1)&function(X1))=>(finite(relation_dom(X1))=>finite(relation_rng(X1)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t26_finset_1)).
% fof(421, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:((relation(X1)&function(X1))=>(finite(relation_dom(X1))=>finite(relation_rng(X1))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[420])).
% fof(490, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(((~(relation(X1))|~(function(X1)))|~(finite(X2)))|finite(relation_image(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(491, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(((~(relation(X3))|~(function(X3)))|~(finite(X4)))|finite(relation_image(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[490])).
% cnf(492,plain,(finite(relation_image(X1,X2))|~finite(X2)|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[491])).
% fof(578, plain,![X1]:(~(relation(X1))|relation_image(X1,relation_dom(X1))=relation_rng(X1)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[20])).
% fof(579, plain,![X2]:(~(relation(X2))|relation_image(X2,relation_dom(X2))=relation_rng(X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[578])).
% cnf(580,plain,(relation_image(X1,relation_dom(X1))=relation_rng(X1)|~relation(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[579])).
% fof(3251, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:((relation(X1)&function(X1))&(finite(relation_dom(X1))&~(finite(relation_rng(X1))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[421])).
% fof(3252, negated_conjecture,?[X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))&(finite(relation_dom(X2))&~(finite(relation_rng(X2))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3251])).
% fof(3253, negated_conjecture,((relation(esk301_0)&function(esk301_0))&(finite(relation_dom(esk301_0))&~(finite(relation_rng(esk301_0))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[3252])).
% cnf(3254,negated_conjecture,(~finite(relation_rng(esk301_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3253])).
% cnf(3255,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_dom(esk301_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3253])).
% cnf(3256,negated_conjecture,(function(esk301_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3253])).
% cnf(3257,negated_conjecture,(relation(esk301_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3253])).
% cnf(5261,plain,(finite(relation_rng(X1))|~finite(relation_dom(X1))|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[492,580,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(73892,negated_conjecture,(~finite(relation_dom(esk301_0))|~function(esk301_0)|~relation(esk301_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[3254,5261,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(73904,negated_conjecture,($false|~function(esk301_0)|~relation(esk301_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[73892,3255,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(73905,negated_conjecture,($false|$false|~relation(esk301_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[73904,3256,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(73906,negated_conjecture,($false|$false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[73905,3257,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(73907,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[73906,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(73908,negated_conjecture,($false),73907,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 3544
% # ...of these trivial : 21
% # ...subsumed : 104
% # ...remaining for further processing: 3419
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 448
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 31
% # Generated clauses : 65935
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 65038
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 219
% # Paramodulations : 65421
% # Factorizations : 14
% # Equation resolutions : 547
% # Current number of processed clauses: 1646
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 131
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% # Negative unit clauses : 22
% # Non-unit-clauses : 1490
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 62977
% # ...number of literals in the above : 383698
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1593818
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 93175
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2442
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 47
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 33
% # Backwards rewriting index: 1340 leaves, 1.71+/-4.092 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 394 leaves, 1.13+/-1.490 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 925 leaves, 1.44+/-3.150 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 4.690 s
% # System time : 0.142 s
% # Total time : 4.832 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 6.39 CPU 6.49 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 6.39 CPU 6.49 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23150/SEU303+2.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------