TSTP Solution File: SEU287+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SEU287+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:28:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 1.04s 1.25s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SEU287+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 04:34:16 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.44  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.44  The process was started by sandbox on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.44  Sun Jun 19 04:34:16 2022
% 0.14/0.44  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 28180.
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.44  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.44  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=12.
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.44  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.44  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.44  clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  There is a clause for symmetry of equality, so it is
% 0.14/0.44  assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 0.14/0.44  paramodulation is disabled.
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: clear(para_from).
% 0.14/0.44     dependent: clear(para_into).
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ordinal(A)| -epsilon_transitive(A)| -epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 301 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -relation_empty_yielding(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 296 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -relation(B)| -function(B)|relation(relation_composition(A,B)).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 294 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 311 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)| -empty(succ(A)).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 301 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 303 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_rng_restriction(B,A)).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 375 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(A,C).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 376 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(B,D).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 377 during input processing: 0 [] {-} in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))| -in(A,C)| -in(B,D).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 132 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,B)|empty(B)|in(A,B).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 358 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)!=empty_set|subset(A,B).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 359 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)=empty_set| -subset(A,B).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 354 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(singleton(A),B)|in(A,B).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 355 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(singleton(A),B)| -in(A,B).
% 0.14/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 372 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(A,singleton(B))|A=empty_set|A=singleton(B).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 373 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=empty_set.
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 347 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|set_union2(singleton(A),B)=B.
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 947 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)|in(B,relation_dom(A)).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 175 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 374 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|subset(A,union(B)).
% 1.04/1.23  164 back subsumes 161.
% 1.04/1.23  945 back subsumes 133.
% 1.04/1.23  978 back subsumes 250.
% 1.04/1.23  979 back subsumes 251.
% 1.04/1.23  1090 back subsumes 380.
% 1.04/1.23  1091 back subsumes 379.
% 1.04/1.23  1092 back subsumes 381.
% 1.04/1.23  1095 back subsumes 176.
% 1.04/1.23  1113 back subsumes 1112.
% 1.04/1.23  1121 back subsumes 1120.
% 1.04/1.23  
% 1.04/1.23  ------------> process sos:
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1747 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1743 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(identity_relation(A)).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1748 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1749 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1747 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1747 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1748 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1708 during input processing: 0 [copy,1708,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1709 during input processing: 0 [copy,1709,flip.1] {-} set_union2(A,B)=set_union2(B,A).
% 1.04/1.23  1795 back subsumes 1505.
% 1.04/1.23  1795 back subsumes 1504.
% 1.04/1.23  1795 back subsumes 1230.
% 1.04/1.23  1795 back subsumes 1149.
% 1.04/1.23  1795 back subsumes 1148.
% 1.04/1.23  1795 back subsumes 1134.
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1796 during input processing: 0 [copy,1796,flip.1] {-} equipotent(A,A).
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1882 during input processing: 0 [copy,1882,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1583.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1580.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1577.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1574.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1549.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1544.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1506.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1503.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1246.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1242.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1238.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1234.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1227.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1226.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1189.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1160.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1154.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1147.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1137.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1136.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1130.
% 1.04/1.23  1882 back subsumes 1110.
% 1.04/1.23    Following clause subsumed by 1883 during input processing: 0 [copy,1883,flip.1] {-} set_difference(A,set_difference(A,B))=set_difference(B,set_difference(B,A)).
% 1.04/1.23  1999 back subsumes 128.
% 1.04/1.23  2001 back subsumes 129.
% 1.04/1.23  2147 back subsumes 1887.
% 1.04/1.23  2148 back subsumes 1888.
% 1.04/1.23  2149 back subsumes 1889.
% 1.04/1.23  2150 back subsumes 1890.
% 1.04/1.23  2151 back subsumes 1891.
% 1.04/1.23  2152 back subsumes 1892.
% 1.04/1.23  2153 back subsumes 1893.
% 1.04/1.23  2154 back subsumes 1894.
% 1.04/1.23  2155 back subsumes 1895.
% 1.04/1.23  2156 back subsumes 1896.
% 1.04/1.23  2157 back subsumes 1900.
% 1.04/1.23  2158 back subsumes 1901.
% 1.04/1.23  2159 back subsumes 1904.
% 1.04/1.23  2160 back subsumes 1905.
% 1.04/1.23  2161 back subsumes 1907.
% 1.04/1.23  2162 back subsumes 1908.
% 1.04/1.23  2163 back subsumes 1910.
% 1.04/1.23  2164 back subsumes 1911.
% 1.04/1.23  2165 back subsumes 1913.
% 1.04/1.23  2166 back subsumes 1914.
% 1.04/1.23  2167 back subsumes 1916.
% 1.04/1.23  2168 back subsumes 1917.
% 1.04/1.23  2169 back subsumes 1919.
% 1.04/1.23  2170 back subsumes 1920.
% 1.04/1.23  2171 back subsumes 1922.
% 1.04/1.23  2172 back subsumes 1923.
% 1.04/1.23  2173 back subsumes 1925.
% 1.04/1.23  2174 back subsumes 1926.
% 1.04/1.23  
% 1.04/1.23  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.04/1.25  
% 1.04/1.25  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 1.04/1.25  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.04/1.25  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.04/1.25  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.04/1.25  
% 1.04/1.25  
% 1.04/1.25  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 1.04/1.25  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.04/1.25  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.04/1.25  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.04/1.25  
% 1.04/1.25  
% 1.04/1.25  The job finished Sun Jun 19 04:34:17 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------